1. Tocqueville's view of "equality" is a man being equal in every aspect of life. If only every man can be just as equal; however, not every man is equal. Tocqueville understands this, but realizes a man cannot be equal until he is ultimately free. In other words, "But one also finds in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to want to bring the strong down to their level, and which reduces men to preferring equality in servitude to inequality in freedom". Tocqueville does accept how the wealthy has more power over the poor. You can relate it by saying the strongest over the weakest or the oldest over the youngest. He admits that equality can be uncertain in society where the dominance can be portrayed as more …show more content…
De Tocqueville had a discussion on how Americans combat the effects of individualism by free institutions. Individualism is what is need to be understood first. It is common for it to be known as something we can do ourselves; our freedom. This is especially true when talking politically of individuals over a state or government control. Tocqueville says that free constitutions were how American’s brought the idea of individualism. They wouldn’t make citizens really get to become close. They are able to know each other as acquaintances, but nothing more than that. For this idea, the reason is so that the citizens cannot form their own groups of interests and opinions. Our country would not be united if every single person was involved in individualism. How would we be able to find ourselves or our different interests? There are so many possibilities out there. We wouldn’t be able to learn different things or new ways. We can only learn from what we know and if that was how our country was; our country would fall …show more content…
The relationship that exists in the USA between civil and political organizations according to de Tocqueville is that the political assembly is for people; specifically men, is to protect themselves and seek the inequality while civil associations come as one. Tocqueville is correct in applying his theory to the current conditions in the United States because it can be relatable today. “Americans combine to give fêtes, to found seminaries, to build inns, to raise churches, to distribute books, to send missionaries to the antipodes. Hospitals, prisons, and schools take shape in that way.” (De Tocqueville 123). There are people who come together and form debates, political campaigns, and try to win the hearts of many people by sharing their views. They share how they want to make this country the best ever. Even non-profit organization’s help the town that’s in need or to raise money. There are many associations that are linked to the army; people with disabilities, people who are sick, or even food
Alex de Tocqueville explored aspects of the perplexing American Union Federal system in “From Democracy in America” whilst searching for a successful government style that would eradicate the failing and outdated monarchy of France. de Tocqueville first opens his excerpt by examining the lack of separation of power between head of state and congress, stating how both entities withheld the ability to “use the militias in cases of insurrection or invasion” (From Democracy in America) which consequently caused chaos during the War of 1812. This haphazard policy caused de Tocqueville to question the effectiveness of the federal system because the “absurd and destructive doctrines received not only the sanction of the Governors and the legislature,
DeToqueville’s Observations of American Culture Alexis DeTocqueville was a French-men who set out on a mission to observe and summarize his experiences within the new system of Democracy. Toqueville’s initial objective was to analyze and re-create the prisons of America. His visitations of penitentiaries all around the country during a nine month journey brought him experiences and findings that he had never expected. Toqueville’s journals and his book “Democracy in America” are essential in our analysis of the 19th century because they provide us with a detailed and unbiased foreign opinion on affairs within America. Upon his return to France, Toqueville started to work on an analysis of culture, politics, and economics in the young country.
Tocqueville witnessed that even though Americans are born with the same status, certain groups still struggled with inequality. Different races and genders created a separation, thus
Alexis De Tocqueville was a French aristocrat was a well-educated, political thinker, and historian, who came to America to study the prisons and jails. He arrived in America with longtime friend Gustave de Beaumont, in May of 1831 and stayed about 9 months. Upon his return home he published his travels and experiences in America, in his book Democracy in America. He believed in Democracy and he envisioned France as a Democracy.
Alexis de Tocqueville, a Frenchman, ventured through America during Andrew Jackson's presidency. In the first volume of his work, Democracy in America, Tocqueville provides a clear understanding of the nature of modern democracy. In the work that he published about the United States after his adventuring, Tocqueville describes the attributes of which the United States possessed which classified a distinct, coming-to-be more modernized form of democracy in the early nineteenth century. In that time period, beginning with Andrew Jackson's presidency, rapid changes occurred in many different concepts which shaped and formed the nation into newer forms that were modified as time progressed and different ideas and plans were passed around throughout
Introduction Progression is one of the most attractive concepts of modern life, the idea that the world is becoming a better place makes people feel good about society. This became very apparent during the 18th century a time when European nations were producing vast amounts of wealth, and experiencing new technological development. People were benefiting from formalized societies which ultimately led to the simultaneous creation of a new conservative view of mankind. The majority of Europeans believed that humanity was shifting away from past eras of savagery and ignorance toward a newly emerging prosperous civilization. However, a Swiss-born French philosopher by the name of Jean-Jacques Rousseau aggressively disagreed with this notion.
Individualism changes the way people define their ties to community and to other people outside relationships with family and friends. Individualism can be seen as positive when it is associated with freedom from social constraints and from oppressive conditions. It can be seen as negative when it is seen as leading to separation from others and to an absence of obligations. In the modern world, individualism is seen as part of society helping people to become free from the constraining traditional society. Alexis de Tocqueville believes individualism is where the individual is in a position to develop and nurture intimate affective bonds with loved ones.
This individualism thrived during the Revolutionary War as the Americans created their own democratic nation in response to a monarchy that would not allow them to govern themselves (Bellah 142). Individualism fueled the American dream of bettering one’s life using one’s own grit. It was the defining ideology that led pioneers out west to start afresh. Up until the 1950s, however,
He puts forward the idea of “freedom of opinion” (Tocqueville 106) and constitutes it as “independence of mind and real freedom of discussion” (Tocqueville 104). Unlike Locke, this stretches far beyond what is done. Tocqueville is careful to differentiate this liberty from the freedom of speech, as this freedom from opinion is more meant to indicate the freedom to follow different paths of thought and not be unfairly judged for it. Once again, it is the majority who suppresses this in Tocqueville’s opinion, as scorn and persecution for unwanted opinions permeate throughout society (Tocqueville 105). Tocqueville’s entanglement of liberty and what is right means that a majority’s limitation of liberty is unjust, while Locke’s concept of liberty means it must necessarily be restrained by a majority in order to protect the principle aim of government, to protect
Furthermore, taking the work as a whole, one finds that main problems of a democracy are the following: a disproportionately high portion of power in the legislative branch, an abuse of or lack of love for freedom, an excessive drive for equality, individualism, and materialism. The elements that Tocqueville believes can most successfully combat these dangerous democratic tendencies are: an independent and influential judiciary, a strong executive branch, local self-government, administrative de-centralization, religion, well-educated women, freedom of association, and freedom of the press. Tocqueville directly applies this newfound thesis to American democracy and explains how this situation can affect the United States. He references this thesis in talking about the pros and cons to American democracy, specifically the dangers and benefits of the
This essay will clarify the reasons of why we need a government and why direct democracy is not a suitable political structure for the current American society. Government is necessary to be established within a society or a community. First and foremost, it can keep up order, which means inhabitants will not frequently suffer inexorable violence and the conduct of breaching ethics. As an illustration, because of the absence of government in the earliest group of British colonists, nobody would punish the people who dared to eat their relatives and colleagues in order to deal with starvation (McGill 2009).
Although Americans like the idea that all Americans stand united with a common identity; in reality, Americans identities’ are based on race and class. Americans also believe in a sense of individualism which is measured in terms of material possessions. Ironically enough, the search for individualism and freedom has led Americans to rely upon the corporate state more than ever. The American struggle for individualism and thus reliance upon the corporate state has made Americans a materialistic and superficial society warped by a consumer fantasy of utopia.
Individuals lay the foundation of America. The Founding Fathers of this unique nation broke their allegiance with Great Britain to create an improved governing body. They desired an individual-centered authority as opposed to Britain’s monarchy, which ruled with tyranny. These Founding Fathers experienced a neglectful democratic monarchy that cared little about the ethical treatment of its people. The domineering actions of Britain challenged these historic individuals to form a new cultural identity.
He believed that aristocracy was gradually disappearing from the modern world and democracy was the inevitable future of the world. While in the United States, Tocqueville noted that people in democratic nations value equality over everything, even liberty. While the dangers of liberty are immediate, the dangers of equality are subtle and only visible in the long run. This equality can lead to an increase of individualism and restlessness. In times of equality, people tend to isolate themselves and limit their interests to their close peers.
De Tocqueville doesn 't view liberty as an attribute part of the democratic era. He believes that the only character that is associated with this era is equality. He explains in his theory that people of this era prize equality over liberty, although he doesn 't deny that democratic people value liberty, because everyone can take part in it and enjoy it effortlessly, as opposed to liberty where you have to "sacrifice" to achieve it (De Tocqueville, 1835). He holds that equality creates individualism, which means people separate themselves from one another, their ancestors and the future generations, that leads to tyranny and despotism. On the contrary, he claims that during the aristocratic ages, people were not selfish and careless about others ' needs because "aristocracy links everybody, from peasant to king" (De Tocqueville, 1835).