Senior Thesis Rough Copy
Malena Roswarski
AP Lit
April 23rd, 2023
Is the Death Penalty an Effective Capital Punishment?
Two thousand five hundred people are on death row in the United States of America right now. Since 1976 more than eight thousand seven hundred Americans have been on death row, and only a little more than one thousand, five hundred fifty have actually been executed. Many Americans have different perspectives on the fisciality, morality, and biblicality of the death penalty. The death penalty is not an effective capital punishment and should be eradicated because of the overall cost to the government, the biases of the people, and the biblical truth against it.
In the United States of America, the death penalty has existed
…show more content…
Because of this, the United States as a united people must find the best solution to the growing issue of the effectiveness of the death penalty as capital punishment. In “The Republican Party, Conservatives, and the Future of Capital Punishment,” the issue of the death penalty’s effectiveness is expanded on in evaluating how political affiliations determine a criminal’s life or death.
The eighth ammendment states, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” (Constitution). With the few people that survived the lethal injection, all of them said the same thing. The lethal injection is excruciatingly painful. While some Americans may think that the criminals on death row deserve to die in pain, practicing cruel and unusual punishment on anyone violates the constitution. Because of the constitutional violation, many people call for the nullification of the death
…show more content…
Although Democrats are mainly against the death penalty and Republicans are divided on this issue, the academic journal “The Republican Party, Conservatives, and the Future of Capital Punishment” states that, “At times when voters had a chance to disband, ratify, or solidify the death penalty, the pro-death penalty option won.” The conclusion of this vote leads many people to come to the consensus that despite their political beliefs, many Americans would rather a person die than risk being exposed to danger in their own lives, no matter how small of a chance there is of that actually happening. Equally important, from a Christian moral perspective, the death penalty is against the Bible. In Exodus 20:13 and Deuteronomy 5:17 it states, “You shall not murder.” The statement is very blunt and clear. To give someone the death penalty is murder, even if that person murdered someone
The death penalty has been one of the most controversial debates in the United States. Some believe that an eye for an eye is an effective mean of punishment while others believe that such mean of punishment is not effective in modern society. Edward Koch believes the death penalty affirms the sanctity of life. In the article by Edward Koch, published in The New Republic, “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life,’ he utilizes the rhetorical devices of ethos, pathos and logos to justify his position for the death penalty towards the people opposing the death penalty.
Oshinsky did a remarkable job explaining the history of the death penalty in a clear and concise way. While the text was fairly short, he effectively provided his readers with well documented and relevant information on how controversial the death penalty has been throughout the past few centuries. He undertook an exceptionally important issue that many Americans do not know much about, or may have conflicting feelings
Difficult, protracted executions constitute infringement of the eighth Amendment, which forbids savage and surprising discipline. Capital punishment disregards the privilege to life as announced in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is a definitive remorseless, cruel and corrupting
This paper will serve to show that capital punishment is not, in fact, ethically permissible. I will argue this by explaining the government’s duty to its people, and how capital punishment is indeed a violation of these prima facie duties. 1. The government has a duty to protect its people from harm (including murder, abuse of power, etc.). 2.
Capital punishment commonly referred to as the death sentence or penalty is a topic of widespread controversy. The question of whether capital punishment is “cruel and unusual” provokes questions about societal values and the philosophy behind punishments. As decreed in the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution it declares the use of “cruel and unusual” punishments is to be prohibited. With many execution methods such as lethal injection, electrocution, beheading, hanging, firing squads, and stoning, it sparks the question. Do these fall under the Eighth amendment?
Research Paper: Capital Punishment Capital punishment is one of the most controversial and talked-about topics in the United States today. It is an issue that is not explicitly mentioned in our constitution, so states have been left to interpret the law. As of April 2017, 32 states in the US legally allow the death penalty. Of the 18 states that have banned it, the most recent was Maryland in 2013. The topic is so controversial that the Supreme Court has gotten involved many times, deciding on more cases that have to do with capital punishment than most other subjects.
Some see the death penalty as the only means to extract justice for victims. Others see it as a morally reprehensible act where a second wrong is committed in order to make something right. With recent issues surrounding the death penalty in which execution hasn 't gone as planned sparking a nationwide debate, this is my outlook on why I 'm for the death penalty not only being abolished in the state of Texas but in addition to the entirety of the US..
Criminals are shielded from cruel and unusual punishments. Finding the better option for good is sometimes the only answer. More so, execution is a crueler punishment than a life sentence without the possibility of parole. The process of entrusting a jury and judge with the power to decide someone's fate and put an end to their life will always be inhumane and seen as a cruel punishment. Although the Supreme Court has ruled capital punishment constitutional, it is difficult to determine if someone really deserves to die rather than just spending life locked away with no possibility of release.
Ever since the outset of the American Constitution, capital punishment has existed as a crime sentence in the United States. However, in recent decades, this topic has become highly controversial, as many states have dictated against the death penalty. Although states with this position on capital punishment are increasing, some states, such as Texas, have continued to edict this practice in their provinces. In the State of Texas, the sentence to death upon a person should not be permitted due to the fact it can wrongly convict a person, its court trial is highly expensive, and it brings forth an unjust treatment.
In 1608 there was about one execution, compared to the year 1850 where there was about 4000 executions made. The years between 1900 to 1972 there was almost 8000 executions, performed in the United States. Nevertheless, in 1973 to 2002 the number executions dropped greatly to around 1000 executions. (Table 1). As previously stated the death penalty has gone through drastic changes throughout history, ecpecially the number of executions through the years This chart* chronicles the United State’s use of the death penalty over the past four centuries.
The Court has to come face to face with the claim that the administration of death, regardless of the offense, is a cruel and unusual punishment, is morally unethical for the government to be conducting, and is a violation of the Constitution. Aside from the fact that death is not only a severe punishment because of the amount of pain and its irreversible finality, the
Capital Punishment in the United States In America, capital punishment also known as the death penalty is a form of punishment that requires a life-life tradeoff for serious crimes. This punishment is acted out and administered based on state. Currently, the death penalty is legal in 28 states, as well as on the federal level. Over the last decade, 266 inmates have been executed in the US. There are varying positions on this issue.
Annotated Bibliography Draft Student name : Haider Zafaryab Student number: 2360526 Thesis Statement : Capital Punishment is a very controversial topic around the globe. I believe that it does more harm than good and breeds violence in society. Source 1: Radelet, M. L., & Akers, R. L. (1996).
The death penalty and how it ties into the morality of the American government is one of the most highly debated topics in America. The death penalty is highly controversial as it falls into deciding if humans should legally judge whether someone should live or die. In Ed Pilkington’s “America’s death penalty divide: why capital punishment is getting better, and worse'' they argue that capital punishment is wrong in the way that it is immoral and is not immune from the bias that comes from America's institutionalized racism. Contrastingly, Zachary Nichol’s “The Death Penalty Should Remain Legal” takes the opposite approach to the death penalty argument and speaks of how the constitution supports the right to use capital punishment.
The article discusses how the Bible treats the concept of the death penalty, with reference to the bible specifically. The author states that the death penalty is a religious view that encompasses matters of belief, faith, and morals in the U.S. The standards of the death penalty were derived from both the written law and the oral law in the Bible. Gardiner also goes into personal basis about how the bible has impacted the system of law today and she also shares her stance on religious aspects regarding her spirituality.