ipl-logo

Debate Between Hamilton Pros And Cons

1426 Words6 Pages

During the late 1700’s there was a great debate over how the country should be run. Also there was controversy over this new Constitution and how it would work. Two sides slowly emerged. The Federalists who believed in a federal system and this new constitution. Their opposition, the Anti-Federalist, believed in a weak central government and had plenty of issues with this new Constitution. The two clashed over many topics such as: the Judicial branch, a stringe union, and the executive powers. Federalist 78 and Brutus XI both discussed the topic of Section XII. This section was all about setting up the supreme court system. Alexander Hamilton, the writer of Federalist 78, believed that there were three objects that needed to be embraced. These …show more content…

Hamilton would have been proud. The branch has reviewed many laws and amendments as their job was; however, the controversy of ruling over things that he had not intended them to would have concerned him. Brutus would have been very upset. In his view he was right all along. The courts have overstepped the boundaries that he believed needed to be in place. Overall Hamilton had the best view on how the courts would slowly evolve. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists both argued on the topic of executive powers. They argued this topic in Federalist 67 and Cato V. The Federalists believed that the change was straying away from a monarchy. The Anti-Federalists thought that this kind of rule would lead to oppression and corruption. Federalist 67 contradicts one common problem that the Anti-Federalist had was the direct appointment of officers that were not needed. The Anti-Federalists had this belief that if the president wanted to that he could appoint officers if he wanted to. Part of Federalist 67 puts these speculations to rest. Hamilton , the author of Federalist 67, said that the president could only appoint officers if not specified by the Constitution. This refers to heads of government organizations. If the head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation left then the president could send nominees to take up this position and they would be accepted or denied by congress (Federalist

Show More
Related

  • National Government Debate Between Hamilton Pros And Cons

    283 Words  | 2 Pages

    CPUSH Transcript: Plan for the National Government Debate Between Federalist and Anti-Federalist—Hamilton vs. Jefferson Alexis Orellana FRANKLIN: Alexander Hamilton as a federalist representative, please explain in a brief summary on why a national government would be more essential opposed to an anti-federalist's view on having a state government. HAMILTON: As a supporter of the constitution we insist on the constitutions balance of power between national and state. We believe that the division of powers and having the system of checks and balances would protect citizens rights from the oppressive rule from an organized power.

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton Federalist No. 1

    338 Words  | 2 Pages

    Federalist No. 1 Analysis Alexander Hamilton was one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. He was born on January 11th of 1755 or 1757 in Charlestown, Nevis and died July 12th, 1804. Hamilton is best known for his interpretations of the Constitution resulting in the Federalist Papers. He wrote this piece in order to address the conflicting views for the newly introduced Constitution; being the Federalists and anti-Federalists. This piece was written in 1788, after the Constitution was released, George Washington was elected as the first president and John Adams as vice president Hamilton is trying to convince readers that Federalists, those in favor of the states being united under one overarching government, were in the right and

    Read More

  • Federalists Vs Anti-Federalists

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    Federalists The Federalists had a better belief on improving the government. They believed in ratification. They knew if you separated the powers of government under three branches, it would protect the rights of people. No one branch has more authority than the other.

    Read More

  • Essay On Jefferson's Consolidation Of Power Dbq

    1149 Words  | 5 Pages

    After the American Revolution, the formation of a new government was precedent. Federalists were afraid of disorder, anarchy, and chaos; the unchecked power of the masses, and sought for the constitution to create a government distant from popular passions. On the other hand, antifederalists were more concerned about the dangers of concentrated power. Equally, the antifederalists opposed the constitution because of the obstacles between the people and the exercised power, which is why federalists supported it. Hamilton was the Leader of the federalist party while Jefferson was the leader of the Republican party.

    Read More

  • Differences Between Jefferson And Hamilton

    511 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander Hamilton was a Federalist which means that he supported the Constitution and what it had to say. He believed that the new America needed a strong, central government and a lot of order and less liberty to keep people from following their vicious passions. The strong central government would be having a president, and one bicameral legislature for the whole country. He did not trust that the people will do the right thing if they are given a ton of liberty. He said, “Take mankind as they are and what are they governed by?

    Read More

  • Hamilton And Jefferson Views Essay

    549 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hamilton and Jefferson Views Thomas Jefferson and Alexander are two of many great leaders, that helped shape the United States. Although these men were both great figures, they had opposing views to each other concerning the central and state governments. Alexander Hamilton, as a Federalist believes that the U.S. government should have a strong central government and a broad interpretation of the Constitution. “Constitutions should consist only of general provisions, the reason is that they must necessarily be permanent, and cannot calculate for the possible change of things”, a quote from Alexander Hamilton allows us to draw a conclusion that he believes the constitution should be written vaguely, so it is adaptive to fit the future. Although

    Read More

  • Compare Federalists And Anti Federalists

    214 Words  | 1 Pages

    “Federalists vs Anti-Federalists” The title of the article is “The Antifederalists were right” it was written on Sept. 27, 2006 by Gary Galles. The article was about the reasons why antifederalists were right. The Federalists wanted a strong central government.

    Read More

  • Weaknesses Of The Articles Of Confederation

    748 Words  | 3 Pages

    Central government did not have the power the federalists wish it would have had under the Articles. Due to the constitution, the central government was too strong in the eyes of the anti-federalists. The Constitution didn’t provide any power for the states and individual freedom. Anti-federalists were scared that if a president was reelected, he would act more like a king. Many people's ideas contributed on the Debate Over the

    Read More

  • Arguments Against The Articles Of Confederation

    651 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the American Revolutionary War, many Americans were opposed to the idea of a strong central government. They saw the idea of a strong centralized government as a gateway back into the familiar tyrannical government and abuse of power that they had just fought so hard to free themselves of. The idea of creating a new Constitution was unnecessary to some because the Articles of Confederation were already in place. The non-supporters of the newly proposed Constitution called themselves “Anti- Federalist.” Naturally, many of the supporters of the new Constitution felt that it was very much needed and they felt as if the Articles of Confederation were not strong enough to functionally run the government.

    Read More

  • What Is The Argument For The Anti-Federalists?

    603 Words  | 3 Pages

    The American Revolution, a war fought against a distant and all too powerful government, instilled a fear of centralized governmental power in the United States. The idea of the U.S. constitution sparked a political divide; it encouraged heated debates from those who are known as Federalists, and those who are known as Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, individuals who supported the ratification of the constitution, argued that the Articles of Confederation were too weak and that a strong national government with checks and balances was needed. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists argued that the president would be like a king and that there needs to be a Bill of Rights to protect the people. If I had been alive in the time of this intense debate, I would have voted for the federalist side of the argument.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    585 Words  | 3 Pages

    Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.

    Read More

  • Federalist Papers Number 78 Written By Alexander Hamilton

    502 Words  | 3 Pages

    Federalist Papers number 78 is written by Alexander Hamilton. It was also published under pseudonym Publius, which is just like other Federalist Papers. In this paper, Hamilton talked about the judiciary branch of the government. Among the three branches, judiciary is the weakest, not with the other two analogies. This department only has the power to judge what the Executive branch carry out.

    Read More

  • Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists Essay

    749 Words  | 3 Pages

    A Anti-Federalists point of view is extremely different from a Federalists point of view. Anti-Federalists wanted to stay with the British government which at that time in history they were a monarchy. This happened to form a major problem considering the violence already happening between the government and their own people. With a monarchy the people were given no say in what would be happening to their country, while in a Anti-federalists community they were scared that a strong central government would take away their right and freedom. Marcus Junius Brutus shows a bit of dislike for a central government by stating this phrase in article no. 1, section 8, clause 18

    Read More

  • Robert Yates Anti Federalist 17 Summary

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government an excessive amount of power, and while not a Bill of Rights the folks would be in danger of oppression. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution did not want a Bill of Rights, that it might produce a "parchment barrier" that restricted the rights of the folks, as critical protective

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    687 Words  | 3 Pages

    Under the Articles of Confederation, the United States government was in shambles. Having left the rule of the British Crown, the States desired a government far from their previous predecessor. However, having given tremendous power to the states and very little to the federal, there was much chaos. A prime example of the failure of this document was Shay’s Rebellion, when farmers rebelled against government officials for debt that they could not repay due to faults in the Articles. Consequently, a new Constitution had to be ratified which resulted in many compromises between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.

    Read More

More about Debate Between Hamilton Pros And Cons

Open Document