In the article that Derek Hawkins wrote for the Washington post's Morning Mix, he wrote about an event that happened in Utah. What happened was a nurse got arrested because she would not let the police draw blood from an unconscious suspect. Hawkins states all of the facts and nothing more throughout his writing. Even though he does not make an argument or state his opinion in his writing, he does make a hint of his opinion through his title, “ ‘This is crazy’ sobs Utah hospital nurse as cop roughs her up, arrests her for doing her job.” He set up the reader on the side of the nurse before the reader even knows what happens. Also, he really emphasizes the points when the police officer is clearly wrong. For example, Hawkins ends the story
When the victim said he thinks the man said his name was Jim or Jimmy he was not certain. But the police went along with that anyway. Then the victim’s uncle said that’s sounds like a man named Jimmy Bain. The victim didn’t get a clear picture of his attacker during his attack and nor did his uncle see when his nephew was kidnapped. The victim and his uncle were just going off assumptions.
The article I read is about a 9-year-old girl named Hilde Lysiak. This little girl has written books inspired from her experiences as a young journalist in her hometown; Selinsgrove, Pennsylvania. “Hilde Cracks the Case” is the title of one of her series which have been published. In April 2016, she broke a story on a homicide near her house. After asking the police for permission, she interviewed some neighbors and posted her article before any other newspapers could.
As a journalist, Peterson’s job is to report the facts, not give his unsolicited opinion on the situation. This is also dangerous because, not only is he shaming the victim’s personal choice to remain silent but he is also forcing his own beliefs on readers who are simply trying to become more familiar with the scandal. By reading about his personal opinions within the article, Peterson demonstrates a lack of empathy for anyone who has dealt with sexual abuse and as a result, readers may find that his argument is unable to sound
Just this quote alone describes how twisted his mind was. The imagery used drew me in because it described how calm he was yet right on the edge of crazy. It makes you wonder how the killer can be so sensitive one moment and then so violent then next. The author used a lot of descriptive words throughout the book especially when the victims dead bodies were described how they were found. Things get carried away during the robbery when he realizes there is no money in the house.
but then he lets all his emotions and ideas out to end vigorously and powerful. Banneker was successful through the use of some locutions like "guilty," "criminal," "cruel" and "oppression. " Utilizing these words most likely turned the way the reader was interpreting
Describing, and living the emotional rollercoaster between each character as they grew in success or perished in horrible ways. This book transforms the human mind through each one of the literary challenges that Larson uses to make a deeper connection to the readers. It takes you to a new state of mind when in Holmes head, and gives you inside look of how, and what a serial killer thinks. Yet with Burnham it gives you a inside look at the growth of the city, and the bond between people. This book would not be complete without the contrasting of the light and dark, heaven and hell, and good and evil aspect
Bukowski writes as if he were speaking. His diction makes the words flow and give the story a very laid back
Using language that is both clear and engaging, draws the reader in with a rich story that is short but packed with so much information with Larson's vivid descriptions. Larson employs a significant amount of dialogue that brings the personalities of the characters to life and helps the reader grasp who they truly were and what their motivations are using primary sources such as letters, diaries, and newspaper articles which add a sense of authenticity and authority behind Larson's writing. One of the works that Larson works with is the memoir of H.H. Holmes, to truly gaze into the mind of a psychopath that shows the reader the length of what Holmes would go through to try and cover up his crimes but also how truly disconnected he was to the world around him once his caricature was blown to
He was able to fully commit his murder because he knew how to talk to her from the start, having stalked her for some time. These two stories are important because it shows how people can be so unaware to the
This book was fantastic for showing those incidents in the ways it sometimes
He also uses a lot of metaphors and similes that makes the story fun and nice to read. An example for this is when Bud saying this: " Todd started huffing and puffing with his eyes bucking out of his head and his chest going up and down so hard that it looked like some kind of big animal was inside of him trying to bust out.". The author used a simile here stating that his chest looked like there was a "big animal" coming out from it. The simile helps us further imagine on what is happening to Todd and gives more drama on that
With all of those strategies it brings this whole book together. He chose to write a book about a murder that happened in Holcomb,Kansas and he gave very specific details when he got to describing the
He builds up the story very slowly, gradually unrevealing the mysteries in the lives of the main
He also plays with expectations of the reader, and towards the end of the last chapter he breathlessly elevates
[He] does not notice the police car… follow him.” This one event, mixed with the stereotype the protagonist has thrown upon him by the cop, seals his fate. All three of these situations foreshadow the ironic and deadly situation that the poor lost man is about to find himself involved. It is these subtle hints to his death that not only add suspense to the plot, but also hold a key importance in conflict development. W.D. Valgardson uses many great elements of fiction to build plot and conflict, as well as teach the lesson of not making snap judgments in his short story Identities.