The Kendra Miranda AP English Language and Composition Mrs. Siqueiros October 13, 2015 The Crucible Film vs. Play After 43 years later, film producer Nicholas Hytner took it upon himself to film the movie version of Arthur Miller's original play The Crucible. Like most film producers who adapt to a novel or play, Hytner strove to maintain the purest version of the play while incorporating his own interpretation of it into his film. As the producer, Hytner was able to alter, delete, and add to the movie in order to make his own appeals in the movie to get his desired reactions from his audience, the viewers. While taking such a responsibility to display the play visually to the best of …show more content…
Hytner produces different looks through screenplay that enhance the hysteria of the movie/play. Starting the movie, Hytner already begins the movie suggesting a vile mood by producing heavy fog and mist before introducing the scene in which the girls are dancing in the woods. Hytner does this in order to provide the setting mood for the rest of the movie. Another example is the fact that Hytner avoids to acknowledge the fact that Elizabeth and John Proctor's relationship is very distant due to the broken past between them. Unlike the movie, the script in the play gravely produces the cold distance between Elizabeth and John. In the play, Elizabeth and John certainly have problems and have cold discussions due to the mistrust Elizabeth has for him after his affair with Abigail. In the movie, there is nowhere near as much emphasis in the distance between Elizabeth and John since they are introduced working together as a family on the farm instead of inside the house before dinner like in the play. In this way, Hytner is able to remove the focus on the character role of proctor and balance it to the rest of the play and on the witch trials. Unlike the movie, the play allows for the reader to build a conflicting reputation following g the contrite character of proctor as he tries to justify himself before his wife. The focus on the character development of John is removed and is magnified upon the tribulations in general brought forth from the witch trials. This allows for greater freedom from the producer to generate the plot and to add suspense from the mysterious events within the movie. Another difference between the play and the movie is the setting in the movie is mainly outside rather than inside. I feel the producer does these scene changes to
The Salem Witch Hunt and the Internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II The Crucible is a play written by Arthur Miller, which is based on the events of the Salem Witch Trials. In the play, a girl accuses innocent people of witch craft, and many people died because of the misunderstanding that it was all a lie. There are many historical events that are similar to the Salem Witch Trials, such as the internment of Japanese-Americans during WWII. In this event, Japanese-Americans were put into internment camps, which were solitary camps made to separate these people from the rest of the U.S. The bombing of Pearl Harbor by Japan caused the distrust of Japanese-Americans similar to those accused of witch craft in the Salem Witch
The Crucible and 12 Angry Men are both, excellent examples of instances when justice is fragile. One individual’s decision could be life or death in these cases. The only person who knows if they are guilty or not for certain is the suspect, unless there is factual proof. During jury duty, the jurors could just be focused on getting the job done so they can leave and do their evening activities. For the suspect, it was his fate.
Scenes like the execution of all the characters accused the kiss between John and Abigail, and the scene where the girls run into the water. Going in order, one of the earlier scenes in the movie and the book was the talk between John Proctor and Abigail Williams. In the book and movie, Proctor and Abigail are seen talking privately after Abigail talks with the other girls threatening them not to
One of those being that John has actually around 60 years of age, but in the play he was around 30. Miller also added Abigail to be in Johns life instead of being just another Townes girl. Miller might of added these two very strategic pieces of the play to show Abigails “ motivation for lying” (Barry). If in the play John was actually 60 and Abigail was irrelevant to John, then there wouldn’t be meaning behind her lying. Another change Miller did was that in the play Proctor only had one wife ,Elizabeth, but in real life John really had 3 wives.
The poem "To My Dear and Loving Husband", and parts of the play "The Crucible" have many similarities. In the poem Bradstreet states her love for her husband, and how she'd rather not live than live without him. For example, she says, "That when we live no more, we may live ever." This statement shows how much love she has for her husband, and how she couldn't go without him. This relates to "The Crucible" because both of the stories show their love for their significant other.
It starts off by showing the girls running into the woods giggling and dancing shouting out boy’s names, whom they like. They don’t show this in the play. The reason for this, in my opinion, is they can’t show some of the things live in front of people. For example, A girl strips down naked, and Abby drinks chicken blood by smashing it on a rock. In the play this was only talked about.
Cameron Oldfield Mrs. Brincks English III 15 November, 2015 The Crucible and Red Scare Imagine being thrown in jail, blamed for something that you didn't do .The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, is a story about how certain propaganda and false accusations can ruin lives, just like in the case of the Red Scare. Although 1692 the Salem witch trials and the Red Scare were over 200 years apart, The similarities are striking. both trials used intimidation, fear, hatred, and false accusations to ruin innocent lives. Both trials resulted in terrible outcomes, with both ending with innocent people being put to death and shunned from society.
The witches seem to stay in the scenes more than the actual play intended them to be. The movie
Nicholas Hytner’s adaptation of Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is pulsating with dramatic energy. Hytner has also directed films that were adapted from stage. Hytner works in a punchy, combustible style, sweeping his camera through the sunny fields of Salem, using wide-angle lenses to make the actors’ faces pop off the screen. In the movie version of The Crucible, Elizabeth Proctor was one of the most believable characters from the play.
The issues it dealt with then are much the same as the issues we deal with now. The modern audience can still relate to the issue of corrupting power, or the struggle to uphold the conscience, the issue of society's 'rules' and our condemnation of those woof those who go beyond those 'rules', along with our inherent desire to 'blame someone else', because of this connection. As with many good plays, The Crucible has many timeless facets, which Miller has incorporated, and these can give us valuable insight into many of our own
Throughout history the fear of corruption and change has compelled people to go to drastic measures to prevent it. The Crucible, a play by arthur Miller, is set in an environment of religious citizens who fear that the devil and witchcraft will corrupt their society. Much like The Crucible, McCarthyism caused the citizens in America to fear corruption of the government by communism. Arthur Miller used his play the crucible as a direct response to McCarthyism and through this play Miller writes about the Salem witch trials during the McCarthy period to comment on how history repeats itself. The social and political factors in The Crucible resemble those in America during the red scare and McCarthyism.
She offers John to come with her and that they can start a new life together away from salem. This difference is seen in the film version but not the play making it more dramatic in the film. Other differences that the play and the film version hold in dis comparison is the opening of both the play and the film, In the Film the beginning starts out in the forest with the girls dancing, While the play holds a different opening with Reverend Parris praying over his own daughter that seems to look unconscious. Something that can be spotted throughout the entire play and film is the backline story of certain characters, Example for John proctor his view and backstory in the film are expressed more and his representation of his storyline are shown heavily, Instead of the play version not giving as much information about his backstory. The film version also shows both John and Elizabeth and it shows a scene of Elizabeth telling John that she is pregnant making John’s mind change over the consideration of dieing or falsely confessing about witchcraft to live.
In the play along with the movie The Crucible, John Proctor and Abigail Williams have interesting relationship bound by adultery and lies. Abigail becomes obsessed with John and will do anything to be with him. John quickly shuts down her fantasy ideas and tells her that what happened between them was a one-time thing that will never take place again and a mistake on his part. With this knowledge, she soon spends all her time plotting to get John all to herself and to make him fall in love with her, even if that means taking out John’s wife, Elizabeth. We see many examples of this forbidden relationship through their secret encounters and arguments in both examples of the story, still, there were more scenes of John and Abby alone in the movie than in the play.
One Choice Can Change Lives Who knew one seemingly innocent lie could cause 19 deaths and pit an entire town against itself? That’s exactly what happens in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. Authors often use similar plot devices, and their favorite one is having their characters face a test. In a small town called Salem in early America, something terrible is happening.
The threat of Communism and the Red Scare put fear of group mentality into many people during the late 1940-50s. The authors of 1984 and The Crucible used their respective works to comment on the social injustice going on in their own lives, which connects to injustice the exists throughout time anywhere in the world. Miller wrote his play, set in 1692, about Puritans and the Salem witch trials because he believed that, similar to his trial for HUAC in the 1950s, the trials in Salem were caused by false accusations and mass hysteria led by powerful individuals. In 1984, Orwell creates a world in the near future that shows group mentality and its threat to conform society with the government.