ipl-logo

Differences Between The North And South In The 1800s

1017 Words5 Pages

In the 1800s there was many differences and challenges between the North and South. Two different sections that relied on different needs and wants. It was hard to satisfy both sections of the Union. Ultimately it will lead to fighting and debating on what is important for the Union to be united and happy. Both sides need each other but each side had their own pride and outlook on the country as a whole. One can comprise multiple times before something extremely bad can happen. This time in history is probably the worse in this young nation’s story. The North was already an urban place to live in the 1800s. The North experienced all four seasons and had a colder climate. You did not have your typical plantation; instead you had many small …show more content…

This compromise also prohibited slavery in territories and new states above the 30° 30’ lines of latitude. Soon after Spanish-American war, the North and South were at a standstill yet again. But later in 1854 that would change with the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which now allowed residents of the states popular sovereignty, which means to vote weather or not the state would be slave or free and went away with the lines of latitude. The Free Soil Party appealed to the North because they wanted to limit the South’s power in federal government. The party wanted to ban slavery in the western territories, which obviously singling out the South since it was their way of life. This would make more free states than slave states so yet again they had to compromise to balance the power. They singed the Compromise of 1850, which admitted California as a free state, New Mexico and Utah would be territories, and the slave trade would be abolished in Washington DC. Also in that compromise you had the Fugitive Slave Act that allowed the government to determine the fate of an alleged fugitive without a jury trail or even testimony by the accused individual. You can see that all these deals and compromises just make matters worse. One of the most pivotal events during this time was the Dred Scott case. He was born a slave and his master moved to a free state and once his master died, he bought his freedom. He went to court and won but it went to federal court where they overruled the state court because he cannot be an American citizen. This showed the North that the South had too much power in the federal government with the reversal of the

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast The Sectional Compromises Between 1820 And 1850

    948 Words  | 4 Pages

    While they did not always agree, they at least could manage their differences. By 1860, the tables had turned. The country was not willing to negotiate with their rival. The South was not willing to stand down for the cause of slavery and the North was not willing to stand for the cause of slavery. Both the North and the South had too much pride that was not going to be swallowed any time

    Read More

  • Explain The Various Compromises At The Constitutional Convention

    510 Words  | 3 Pages

    It imposed a tax, including tariffs on imports. In this Compromise, smaller States had benefited because did not depend on the slave, but large States was not happy with it. The Northern States were interested in both taxes on imports as well as exports, but the Southern did not want taxes and they wanted to keep their power. It was all about the power restriction of trade, import and export from foreign

    Read More

  • How Did The North And South Affect The American Economy In The 19th Century

    895 Words  | 4 Pages

    In conclusion, the mid-1800s in the North, South, and West each had its own economy, technology and people, but all left their mark on the future of the United

    Read More

  • Alfred W. Blumrosen's Slave Nation

    685 Words  | 3 Pages

    The north compromises but later the civil war solves the problem of slavery in United States. This war decision is the key for the independence of

    Read More

  • Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

    Read More

  • What Are The Causes Of The Missouri Compromise

    205 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was made as an attempt to deal with the debate that had been going on about slavery. It lasted thirty-four years, but never truly made the North orouth totally happy with the situation. Although the Missouri Compromise did push back the debate on slavery in Missouri, it did not solve the problem as a whole. The tension between the North and South was, in fact reduced for a period of time. Once the Missouri Compromise was declared unconstitutional, the tension once again grew.

    Read More

  • Constitution Of 1787 Dbq Essay

    1301 Words  | 6 Pages

    This compromise allowed for the unjust international slave trade to continue until the year 1808. This was to ban the government from regulating the importation of slaves so the southern states could stop the spread of slavery and keep it inside their territory. It also allowed for the state of Maine to join the Union as a so-called slave state; they did this to maintain a balance between the slave owner states and the free states of the United

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast North And South In 1870

    1017 Words  | 5 Pages

    In 1870, the United States was in the midst of drastic changes as technology advancements and new laws led to rapid industrialization. While the North had seen much of this progress take effect, the impacts on the South and the West were just beginning to take shape. Numerous aspects of the American economy, such as plantation systems, the Clipper Ships, the emergence of trade unions, and the invention of the McCormick Reaper, had become integral parts of the economic landscape. Immigration and tenant farmers, abolitionists, and nativists were at the forefront of cultural and economic changes that were occurring across the country. This essay will explore the various technologies, economies, and people of 1870 in the North, South, and West

    Read More

  • How Did Slavery Ended In The Late 1800s

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    This whole situation caused controversy and anger feelings. Even though there wouldn’t be an agreement because of those who accepted slavery to happen and a war would end up happening the government could have ended it by agreeing with the northern states, and instead of seeing those who fought for their rights being killed they should have just set laws favoring all citizens, and not letting violence happen and creating a bigger problem. There were ways to solve a situation like this instead of choosing violence. The civil war could have been prevented if there was union, but instead of choosing other ways they decided to divide and have opposing sides that only caused

    Read More

  • Apush Civil War

    1353 Words  | 6 Pages

    Northern States held a commanding majority in the House of representatives and there was an equal division between the slave and free states which enabled the South to maintain a veto power in the Senate. Henry Clay, the “Great Compromiser” created six proposals that would offer concession, one to the North and open to the South. The bill admitted California as a free state , at the price of a stronger fugitive slave law, created territories of Utah and New Mexico, and allowed popular sovereignty when it came time for each to write its constitution. Most importantly, the compromise abolished the slave trade but not slavery itself arguing it was immoral to buy and sell humans. The sectional forces would soon gather strength and lead to the ultimate disunion.

    Read More

  • What Caused The Civil War Dbq

    1122 Words  | 5 Pages

    These were a big deal involving slavery because they either strengthened slavery or made it seem like it was going to end all together. To the South, the thought of slavery ending was a complete disaster. In Document 9: Excerpt from the Dred Scott Decision, shows how Scott saw the Missouri Compromise. He says, “(I)t is the opinion of this court that the Act of Congress (the Missouri Compromise) which prohibited a citizen from holding and owning property of this kind (slaves) in the territory of the United States north of the line therein mentioned,...” This quote from his speech says he thinks that the Missouri Compromise was a good thing because it prohibited people who own slaves to cross the North and South border with their “property” or slaves.

    Read More

  • Political Dispute Around 1820-1860 Essay

    61 Words  | 1 Pages

    The cause of most political dispute around 1820-1860 was mostly about slavery. There has been division between the North and the South, though compromise had usually serve in calming the disagreement. However, nearing 1860, political compromise appeared useless. Comprises simply postponed addressing the issue, and led to even more greater issues than needed,compromise wasn’t working politically, socially,and economically for our nation.

    Read More

  • What Was The Missouri Compromise

    261 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise greatly limited the growth and development of slavery in the United States. It allowed Missouri to become a state, and to allow slaves, and Maine, as a free state. The compromise also prohibited the practice of slavery in the northern portion of the Louisiana Territory. By this time, the importation of slaves from Africa had been outlawed, and they could only be purchased within the country. This meant also meant, that states that entered would be free states.

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    Slavery was one of the biggest problems between 1820 and 1860. Sometimes two states had to be added to the Union at the same time, to make things fair. The North and the South fought almost constantly over the issue of slavery, sometimes things were able to be worked out about it, but as the years passed, the problems with slavery and territory started to become too big to ignore or

    Read More

  • 1820 To 1860 Dbq Essay

    611 Words  | 3 Pages

    The cause of most political dispute around 1820-1860 was mostly about slavery. There has been division between the North and the South, though compromise had usually sufficed in calming the controversy. However, nearing 1860, political compromise appeared useless. Comprises simply postponed addressing the issue, and led to even greater issues,compromise wasn’t working politically, socially,and economically for the nation.

    Read More

More about Differences Between The North And South In The 1800s

Open Document