Do Rich People Get Off Easier When They Break the Law? If an intoxicated motorist was driving, had a head on collision with one’s parents, murdered them, and got away with it all because they had a large sum of money. How could the close relatives and family members of the deceased victim be satisfied with that? The law states that all in the United States is to be treated properly and given the same Constitutional rights as everybody else. Any middle-class plaintiff would attempt to search for justification as to why the upper-class defendant was let off easier. Or in other words, found innocent in a case where they believe the defendant should have been presided guilty. The Criminal Justice System gives each individual a fair chance. No matter ones social or economic rank. Individuals who have more money and commit a crime do not get let off at ease as opposed to the masses just because they have more money. As it declares in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Declaration of Independence, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that ALL men are created equal”, which means the states must provide all people equal treatment under the law. There are plenty of common, famous societies that squirm out of their responsibilities. The lawyers are the ones …show more content…
Nonetheless, everyone flows through the same system; the differences of the sentencing appear to be massive given to the elite wealthy versus the condemning normally set to the mediocre citizen. The O.J Simpson case, for example. A Public court found him at fault under unlawful murder. However, the Main court overruled them leaving O.J in the clear. Peyton Manning, for instance, the Professional football player was harshly indicted of rape. The charges erratically vanished after a couple of days. Famous thespians get off with a lighter verdict or unrestricted of all charges simply because they are wealthier than the typical
That being said,I agree with Gideon that people who aren't able to afford a lawyer who has the knowledge and capability to properly defend them,should be provided one. The legal system should not have anything to do with your social status or financial status. I feel like the law should also go for people paying money to avoid a jail sentence. Some people can't afford to pay any money to avoid jail or other punishments,so they get sent to jail and then they have a record. Instead of having people pay money for their offenses,there needs to be more creative punishments,or community service.
The documentary 13th was released on October 7, 2016 and it triggered a worldwide shock. As a documentary, it was adept enough to address several ongoing issues, especially regarding the maltreatment of African Americans, but the documentary was shaped around the theme that African Americans were never free, and continue to fight for that freedom. The content within the documentary varied from earlier times where slavery, segregation and, Jim Crow laws existed to the more implicit manner of racism that is presented through the massive imprisonment of African Americans, and unjustified use of the criminal justice system against them. The documentary revolves around three main themes: the overrepresentation of African Americans in the media,
The united states is one of the most empowered country’s from our economy, to our military, but like every other country we have our flaws. Our flaws are found in our judicial system. You can witness these flaws by watching the HBO series paradise lost, a documentary about the West Memphis three, a brutal killing of three West Memphis boys. This court case shows many flaws from the bias to the actual evidence the prosecution shows.
Hawthorne-Allen once said during a lecture that power and politics ruled the world during the time of Aristotle. This unfortunately stands true today, particularly in our government. With tax breaks for the wealthy and layoffs for the working class, it seems the government stands in favor of those with monetary pull. If a child in the same socioeconomic class as the Walls children were to find him or herself in trouble, ‘justice’ seems to be delivered more swiftly than for a child with parents in a position of power in the community. Take, for instance, what can be dubbed as “Hollywood Crimes” compared to normal crime.
The rich don’t have to face any consequences for their actions because they are able to disappear and use their money to avoid
I choose this case because judicial bias is an awful thing and no judge should be biased. In January 2015 a prior student at West Chester University in Pennsylvania was found guilty of rape and was sentenced to six years in prison. This person was charged six years of prison while Turner was sentenced to six months in jail. They both were found guilty and yet the other person had six times the sentence Turner got. It should not matter if the person is rich or poor, very influential in the community or not, you always need to judge a case by the evidence that is shown.
Anthony Zurcher, an editor for “Echo Chamber” published in BBCNews, wrote the article “Affluenza Defense: Rich Privileged, and Unaccountable” in response to a Texas judge’s ruling on a controversial case. This case was about a 16-year-old boy, Ethan Couch, who drove with a “blood-alcohol level three times above the legal limit” (283), lost control of his pick-up truck and killed four pedestrians. Couch’s lawyers argued that he lacked a sense of responsibility because of his absent, wealthy parents and the lavish lifestyle he lived. This argument led the judge to sentence Couch to a drug rehabilitation center, paid for by his parents, and 10 years probation. There are many other cases similar to Couch’s where the perpetrator would receive a
America has massive injustice in terms of income and wealth inequality America is the wealthiest country in the history of the world We don’t know that because most money is going to the top 1% America has the most wealth and income inequality than any other developed country in the world A handful of people have incomprihensable ammounts of wealth Giant Yachts Planes Tens of Billions of dollars which is more than enough for a thousand lifetimes Millions of people struggle to find money to go to a doctor, or buy a house or even food 1 family owns more wealth than the bottom 130 million Americans People talk about Morality and Justice Theres no justice when…
"Results indicate that, while structural-level variables played a large part in explaining the development of the guidelines, a more accurate and complete understanding of this process is possible by including an analysis of the individual-level characteristics of Commissioners, including their professional backgrounds, ideological perspectives, styles of leadership, and future goals" (Rodriguez, 2018, pp. 1-17). In my opinion, social status affects sentencing because these people are respected members of society. Quite a few times I have seen these people receive small sentences based on who they are and because they have money. Some are not even in jail for more than a few hours and then they are placed on paper for things such as probation.
That doesn’t give any room for exceptions or any shades of grey, which seems to be exclusionary. What about the “decent” families who are non-violent but break the law out of necessity? Since they’re included in the working poor, they might need to resort to stealing in order to
Notoriety, a noun, is the state of being well known for something bad. Many infamous trials have taken place over the years and, at first, one may think that notoriety affects such cases. This is not true; although public opinion may convey its decision on one verdict, it is always possible that the opposite will be chosen. Based on the general procedures instituted in a courtroom, the decision will be made according to how the evidence is presented to the judge and/or jury, regardless of how strongly the people may feel. Therefore, criminal court proceedings are not immensely impacted by notoriety.
Short Summary: Chapter 2 of The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison was about how the way society sees crime can be distorted by the media, the justice system, and the information we are presented with about what crime really is. It points out that medical neglect, known environmental hazards, dangerous workplace conditions, and poverty cause more injuries yearly than murders, assaults, and robberies. Most people see the latter as “crime,” but not the former. Long Summary: Chapter 2 of The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison discusses people’s skewed perspective when it comes to what they think crime really is. The reader is asked to do an exercise regarding their own reason.
The United States prides itself on being a country of opportunities where the underprivileged can rise up and everyone is treated equally, but is that really the case? In reality the income of an individual gives them advantages of going above the system. The sociological explanation of the influence of the wealthy over the criminal justice system is described in the of the Pyrrhic defeat theory written in Jeffrey Reiman and Paul Leighton book The Rich Get Richer and the Poor get Prison Ideology, class and Criminal Justice. The Pyrrhic defeat theory emphasizes the failure of the criminal justice is the consequence of success for those in power, who are taking advantage of the system.
Twelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.
In the U.S.A alone since 1973 130 innocent people have been sentenced to death(1) and in the last two years evidence has come up that indicates four men previously thought to be guilty may have actually been innocent and put to death(3). The death penalty is supposed to protect innocent people from killers, instead it murders them. And these are the people who have been discovered to be innocent! What about the ones who were not so lucky? A recent example of this is Richard Glossip a man who was sentenced to death based on a corrupt statement with no other evidence to prove him guilty (5).