ipl-logo

Dred Scott Case Summary

550 Words3 Pages

Summary of Source
The editorial discloses the power that the Court adheres to and whether it should be accountable for the decision making of fugitive slaves. The writer had discussed that in no way did the verdict of the Dred Scott case follow an act of law, but was merely “nullity.” During the settlement, they decided that since Dred Scott’s master had brought him on free land in Missouri or of the United States without having a citizenship, which resulted in him having no case. It continues on to say that the jurisdiction of the case was influenced by opinion, which did not involve any legalities. The text also alluded to previous court cases, such as Marshall vs. Court and the National Back, where Congress was declared to having unconstitutional implementations, that were based on a loose structure.

Summary Context and Point of View
The Court had …show more content…

The problems lied in the misinterpretation of the clauses that were present in the Constitution, that “was made by the people and for the people; and to the people, while also stating that, “the sovereign power in [the] confederacy, we appeal from this decision. They understand the charter of their liberties, we hope, full well enough to rebuke and defeat, at the polls, this effort to give the whole country up to the domination of the slave power.” This quote supports the political lens as the start of the Civil War because the Constitution is being referred to as an entity, and shows that slavery was a product of legal disputes and restrictions of protecting those who were not looked upon as valuable or human. Lastly, a drawback of this piece of evidence could be the writer is not a witness, nor a Judge of the Supreme Court, so he cannot recount all the factors that were taken into consideration during the

Show More
Related

  • Scott Sisters Case Summary

    646 Words  | 3 Pages

    A Case Analysis of the Scott Sisters Jamie and Gladys Scott, infamously known as the Scott Sisters, were convicted for organizing an armed robbery of two African American men in Mississippi after three male alleged accomplices testified against them in exchange for a plea bargain. The armed robbery netted a grand total of eleven dollars, and there were no reported injuries during the attack. The Scott sisters were found guilty and were sentenced to “two consecutive life sentences” for armed robbery (Austin & Irwin, 2012).

    Read More

  • Roger B. Taney's History In The 1857 Dred Scott Case

    561 Words  | 3 Pages

    Roger Brooke Taney made history in the 1857 Dred Scott Case by ruling that black slaves were not citizens of the United States. This controversial historical figure died on October 12, 1864, in Washington, D.C. One of Robert’s most famous quotes was "What Dred Scott's master might lawfully do with Dred Scott, in the free state of Illinois, every other master may lawfully do with any other one, or 1,000 slaves, in Illinois, or in any other free state. "What Robert is saying is that a master of a slave can do whatever he/she wants with that slave. By the time Roger B Taney became Chief Justice, Taney had become a staunch supporter of slavery, even though he had manumitted eleven slaves he inherited as a young man and made anti-slavery statements when serving as defense

    Read More

  • Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case Study

    455 Words  | 2 Pages

    The two parties in this case are Dred Scott and John Sanford. Scott, a former slave bought by Dr. John Emerson, argued that when him and the Emerson family moved to Illinois, which was a free state, that he became a free man and no longer could be held as a slave to the Emerson family when they moved to the slave state of Missouri. Sanford, Mrs. Emerson’s brother, argued that since he went to Missouri with Mrs. Emerson, and that it was legal in Missouri to hold slaves, that he was still considered to be Mrs. Emerson’s property. Once Dr. Emerson died, Scott and his family sued Mrs. Emerson for false imprisonment, but Mrs. Emerson won the case in a Missouri Circuit court when Scott’s lawyers were unable to prove that Emerson was holding him as a slave. Scott’s lawyers argued for a retrial and it went to the Missouri Supreme Court.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Franklin Scott Case

    1574 Words  | 7 Pages

    This memo is in reference to the above captioned client and his court date in front of the Honorable Judge Minehart scheduled for March 1st, 2018. Mr. Franklin Scott is a 36 year old African American male currently incarcerated at the Curran Fromhold Correctional Facility. Mr. Scott has been incarcerated since November 20th 2016. He has been charged with the following: Possession of a Firearm, Carrying a Firearm without a license, Carrying a Firearm in Public, and Possession of Marijuana.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott And Ryland Case

    451 Words  | 2 Pages

    On December 24th 1851 court was adjourned until March 15th 1852. Dred Scott did not deny that the case had been heard before; he did however state the decisions were never based on Missouri law. In Dred Scott’s conclusion he stated, “slavery was the will of God and times now are not what they were when former decisions on the subject were made”. Basically Scott knew racial and sectional prejudices played a role in the decision. Justice Hamilton Gamble agreed with Dred Scott that times have changed but disagreed that any principles had changed.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott V. Sanford Case Of 1857

    567 Words  | 3 Pages

    This case had to deal with the rights of the enslaved individuals in Missouri at the time. Dred Scott and his owner moved to Illinois. The reason why this case came to be was because in the state of Illinois, slavery was made illegal. After, moving to this state Dred then refusal to move back to Missouri where enslavement was allowed. The reason for Scott refused to move because now that he is in Illinois where enslavement was banned, he believes that he was a free man.

    Read More

  • The Controversy: The Dred Scott Case Of 1857

    643 Words  | 3 Pages

    When one holds a prestigious position on the United States Supreme Court, they possess the opportunity to alternate the future of the country. However, that impulse should not be entertained in the majority of instances, as with the Dred Scott Case of 1857. Although that conflict should have dissolved after the subject dissolved, Chief Justice Roger Taney allegedly overextended his reach to determine the legality of another issue that had troubled the United States. In addition, the decision decided on the case itself negates the framework of the U.S. Constitution by infringing on an individual’s rights, regardless of who they might be. At the time of the Dred Scott Decision, the United States had become deadlocked over the controversy

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Dred Scott Case

    924 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court was summoned back into this case by Scott, but they didn’t support his claim or even give a reasonable statement regarding this decision. All Supreme Court Justices voted in favor for Sanford, and stated that “no black, free or slave, could claim U.S. citizenship, and therefore blacks were unable to petition the court for their freedom,” meaning Dred Scott lost again. After this trial, “the case grew in scope and significance as slavery became the single most explosive issue in American

    Read More

  • Did The Constitution Lead To The Failure Of The Union Dbq

    796 Words  | 4 Pages

    It is true to say that by the 1850’s the Constitution went from an instrument of unity to a source of tension, and lead to the failure of the union. The Constitution originally helped maintain peace, but when issues over slavery appeared, it failed to provide the guidance the union needed. Because of differing interpretations of the Constitution and the multiple conflicts, it lead to disunion. Because not everyone could agree on what the constitution implied, it led to the failure of the union. Document E states: “The words ‘slaves’ and ‘slavery’ are not to be found in the Constitution, and therefore that it was never intended to give any protection or countenance to the slave system, it is sufficient to reply..

    Read More

  • Dbq On Reconstruction Research Paper

    648 Words  | 3 Pages

    I believe that the results of Reconstruction have been mixed and i believe that the economy is a problem that needs to be fixed. By not dictating who can have what job based on their race Reconstruction can meet its goal of creating equality for all. During Reconstruction, Americans had very different opinions about the government. In the northern states, most people believed that since the South had seceded before they had to keep an eye on them.

    Read More

  • Slavery In Stevens's This Great Struggle

    364 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before reading This Great Struggle, I always viewed the Civil War as just a war that sprouted out of nowhere and just sort of happened over the single reason of slavery. But after reading this book I found that my misconception of the Civil War was extremely inaccurate. While reading this book I learned many new things about the Civil War that I had never known about before and I believe that it has given me a completely new outlook on the Civil War. Although he demonstrates how the war was not caused only by slavery, but he also proves the concept that slavery was a major cause of the Civil War. While reading This Great Struggle, I found that the war was, although commonly avoided and excused, fought over slavery.

    Read More

  • To What Extent Was The American Civil War Over The Issue Of Slavery

    168 Words  | 1 Pages

    After reading chapters 13 and 14, I do not believe that the American Civil War was fought over the issue of slavery. Slavery was the central point of the conflict, but the main contention was brought about by states rights. The war was fought over the limits of the federal power and states sovereignty over their land. The issue was not slavery, but who decided weather it was legal, were these local government in charge or some distant central power? Southern states decided to succeed because they wanted their own laws and they wanted to own slaves; they felt that the federal government had failed them by not upholding several acts.

    Read More

  • The Dred Scott Decision And Bleeding Kansas

    756 Words  | 4 Pages

    America’s founders created the constitution in order to create unification and order in the United States. However, there have been controversy surrounding the interpretation of the constitution, this has caused debate over many issues within the country. These issues and the lack of wartime policy within the constitution directly lead to the Civil War, which was one of the worst alterations this nation has faced. The Missouri compromise, the Dred Scott decision, and Bleeding Kansas were controversial issues surrounding the constitution that directly lead to the Civil War.

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq Essay

    1888 Words  | 8 Pages

    A single cause for the Civil War cannot be fixated on a single issue, rather it is vital to understand that multiple variations in the North and South’s politics, society, and economy all culminated to a point where war was deemed necessary. In addition, these variations existed long before the years leading up to the Civil War - the geographical constraints presented to the colonists created the different identities of the North and South. Years later, the conjunction of these differences and the attempt to unify contrasting regions lead to the Civil War. In essence, the differences in culture, race, and gender between the North and South ultimately created the Confederate States of America who waged war against the United States.

    Read More

  • Why Did The American Civil War Was Inevitable?

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    Two fundamental questions normally surround the history of any war: whether the war was inevitable and if it was necessary. These same questions emerge any time during debates regarding the American Civil war. The most cited cause of the Civil war is the secession of certain southern states that formed the Confederate States of America in January 1861. Thomas Bonner writes "Civil War Historians and the "Needless War" Doctrine" arguing that Southern Carolina seceded in 1860, followed by six other states by January the following year. A deep analysis of the events leading to the war indicates that the Union and the Confederates had profound ideological, economic, political, and social differences.

    Read More

More about Dred Scott Case Summary

Open Document