Employment law is fraught with complex legislative frameworks and the area of redundancy is no different. Employers are entitled to make an employees position redundant. This may effect a single employee, a collective group or even a firms entire workforce should a full closure of business arise. Usually a savvy employer will offer the opportunity of voluntary redundancy in the first instance followed by a compulsory approach if needed (Cox et al,2009). So what legal protections are afforded to employees facing a redundancy situation? We will seek to answer this question concisely and comprehensively in this paper with a particular focus on contemporary forms of protest and resistance, its merits and success for whom that may be should the …show more content…
I will not just state or lay out the law and accept it as is. I believe that type of informing provides an injustice to the reader who is yearning for a comprehensive establishment of the legal protections surrounding redundancy, in particular, shining a light on the legal frailties if …show more content…
An employee is entitled to two weeks salary per year of service with an additional bonus week. This sum is capped at €600 per week or €31,200 per annum. The payment of redundancy applies to all employees who have completed at lest 104 weeks continuous service. This offers little protection to workers and Whelan and Walsh (1977) argue that this length of service condition bars the majority of people who become unemployed due to redundancy. In examining figures in the UK which contains a similar 2 years continuous service requirement, Fryers (1971) comes to a rough estimate that only 1 in 3 receive payment from a redundancy situation. Barrett (1998) distinguishes between a visible system consisting of statutory redundancy with an additional ex gratia payment which he argue is dependant on a number of factors, the strongest being the unionisation of a workforce in bargaining better terms of employment. In relation to the inferior ‘invisible’ system he sums it up drawing on Daniels (Cited in Barrett, 1998:
Former civil rights leader Cesar Chavez justifies nonviolent protest with the use of several appeals to logic and ethics in his contribution to a magazine for a religious organization. His goal being to convince the audience into realizing that nonviolent protest is the more effective option when working towards a change. His optimistic tone helps the reader connect to the cause of nonviolent protest with the help of rhetorical devices like figurative
The main idea is of this article is on the reason why protesters are protesting in the first place, not which methods of protesting they choose to
Cesar Chavez, in a speech honoring Martin Luther King, Jr, discusses the importance of nonviolent resistance, and how it is used in many struggles, including the labor movement. As a major labor organizer, nonviolent resistance was a tactic Chavez used frequently. In this article discussing nonviolent resistance, Chavez uses diction, appeals, and juxtaposition to advance his cause and convince the reader of the superiority of his position. The author uses diction to convey his message of the superiority of nonviolent resistance and to make readers more sympathetic to his cause.
To predict the outcomes, Chavez declares what would happen if his group resorted to violence, “Either the violence will be escalated and there will be many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides, or there will be total demoralization of the workers.” Chavez paints the explicit picture of these results to contrast with those of his movement. Correspondingly, Chavez portrays his organization as a plausible alternative to retaliate against injustices. Cesar Chavez assures the religious readers of his article that his actions are justifiable, and that supporting his movement would be a judicious decision on their behalf. To put it differently, Chavez interprets the consequence of violence within an activist campaign, “When victory comes through violence, it is a victory with strings attached.”
Cesar uses historical information in order to present a scenario where the use of non-violence successfully worked in Gandhi’s protest. Chavez further elaborates upon his success by stating “The boycott, as Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change, allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause.” Chavez appeals to his audience’s reason by examining how Gandhi's nonviolent protest lead to his movements increased numbers and how it was “allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause.” he uses this appeal in order to reason with hi people that nonviolence will increase the success of their protest by increasing their
When “...victory comes through violence...victory would come at the expense of injury and perhaps death,” (65-68). By naming the consequences of violent, Chavez conveys the importance of maintaining a good cause for a movement. Chavez proceed to contradicts the purpose of a nonviolent change by questioning “...if...we are committed to nonviolence only as as a strategy... then... our alternative is to turn violent…”
Protestors do not have to have wealth or a high class status, instead they need to fight for a cause the same cause. This idea proves that “the rich and the poor are mutually dependent on each other” (Young
"Tapping the Roots of Power" and "An Active Technique of Struggle" are two chapters where Gene Sharp, analyzes how power is continuously interchangeable amongst the oppressed which are usually minorities and their oppressors which usually are symbolized by people of power. In both chapters, Sharp in great detail gives the reader many scenarios in which oppressed groups through civil disobedience fight against their oppressors, usually leading to victory which resembles freedom and liberation. Although oppressed groups have a great deal to loose, their constant struggling motivates them to fight against the oppressor and regain their liberty and rights back. Once minorities start to challenge authority, their obedience is lost. Once this happens,
“A Triumph for Moral Authority,” by Isabel Hilton was published in an issue of the Independent (November 15, 2010) as part of the opinion column. This work discusses the impact of a protester’s moral authority and what kind of change (if any) it may lead to. It gives a look into what the possible outcomes may result because of activist actions. The article addressing moral authority by Isabel Hilton is astonishing and very informative due to the author’s ability to present well-structured ideas for each paragraph along with a strong and appropriate use of evidence.
Cesar mentioned that, “If we resort to violence…the violence will be escalated and there will be many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides, or there will be total demoralization of the workers” (Garcia, 77). He created this idea that violence does not solve anything, and will only create bigger problems. However, a nonviolent movement is a protest
Rebellions can drive people out and can lead to many other people dying for not cause at all and to be shown with no improvement in our social progress as a whole. In conclusion, Oscar argues that disobedience is a valuable human trait and that it promotes social progress and also how rebellion and disobedience can lead to positive changes in the economical and social viewpoint. It can help learn from history and help us expand our way of mind and people can learn a few new things from it also. It many lead down a pathway in which it improves lives as well our society for positive changes and help us unite with other people to fight what in we believe
Throughout history people fought for civil rights, but only those who fought with nonviolence truly succeeded. In an article written by a labor union organizer and civil rights leader, Cesar Chavez, he effectively uses a hypophora and allusions to persuade the audience to believe that nonviolent resistance is the only way to achieve meaningful and significant change. The hypophora present in “who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers” effectively claims that violent revolutions are harmful and counterproductive.
Negligence is the breach of a duty caused by the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do. Actionable negligence consists in the neglect of the use of ordinary care or skill towards a person to whom the defendant owes the duty of observing ordinary care and skill, by which neglect the plaintiff has suffered injury to his person or property. ELEMENTS OF NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS The definition involves three constituents of negligence: (1) A legal duty to exercise due care on the part of the party complained of towards the party complaining the former’s conduct within the scope
Thirdly, I believe that flexibility is very important today with the employees, because if the working hours are not flexible, they tend to either do not prefer working here or when they get the opportunity they move out. So if wee summarize, in my experience I believe that wages, growth and flexibility are the main reasons that cause turnover in the
Civil Disobedience Thousands of dedicated people march the streets of a huge city, chanting repetitively about needing a change. They proudly hold vibrant signs and banners as they fight for what they believe in. Expressions of determination and hope are visibly spread across their faces. These people aren’t using weapons or violence to fight for their ideas; simply, they are using civil disobedience.