I interned with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission of Raleigh. Confidentiality is one of the most important issue that is a must. One such day as I went along my business I called an employee of a company to find if there was any correlation between discrimination and termination. The survey went along until I asked a question and they exclaimed they wanted the person who filed the claim against the company. This situation is an ethical dilemma. An ethical dilemma is an issue that it involves serious consequences to human welfare because it is effecting four parties: the EEOC, myself, the charging party and the employee who asked. The resolution could harm all four parties or not any parties.
Egoism is an ethic theory that of an act
…show more content…
Utilitarianism express that actions are judged on whether they contribute to the good of everyone rather than detracting. If I tell the person the identification of the charging party I detract from proving good for everyone. I affect all four negative parties. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission gets harmed as they indirectly could get involved in a lawsuit. I get harmed because I would lose a job. The charging party would get harmed in the way because that other employee could cause harm to them directly. There is harm also to the party the information is told to because they gain information that could be dispersed to more parties causing more harm. But if I withheld and not tell, I contribute to the good of everyone. It is okay to harm some individual for the greater good of the whole community. In this case it would be wise to politely argue back to the person wanting the information that no information will be given as it is not permitted. I would stop their …show more content…
A potential consequence of giving the information away is fulfilling the curiosity of the individual. Since I was conducting the online survey, my supervisor would not know in that instance however the truth could be revealed afterwards when the charging party calls backs and expresses why someone knew that they filed a charge. A rebuttal of the exposure would put the EEOC into a lawsuit and the loss of my internship. I would no longer be able to work for the federal government. However things would be different by withholding the confidential information, as I would adhere to the confidential policy and the privacy of the charging party would be respected. I would not lose my ability to work of the federal government and the EEOC would not get
The EEOC Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is a federal agency that administers and enforces civil rights laws against workplace discrimination. Before 1964 employers can sometimes not hire an individual because of several reasons. For example, an employer can denied a person application because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex orientation, age and disability. The Civil Right Act of 1964 as amended in 1972 allows employees to fight back. Therefore, employers can no longer do such things.
Charfi Medical is implementing a compliance program to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse. This compliance plan has a mission of providing quality patient care. The compliance plan’s objectives are to provide a proactive program that ensures full compliance with all applicable policies, procedures, laws and regulations especially HIPAA. The HIPAA Privacy Rule creates a base of Federal protection for personal health information, cautiously established to avoid creating unnecessary barriers to the delivery of quality health care. Compliance plan objectives: Implementing a medical compliance plan limit our liability by reducing innocent billing mistakes and exposure to fraud and abuse allegations, which helps avoid governmental audits.
The new ruling by President Obama that employers must disclose pay data also this law extends the period in which a pay discrimination suit can be filed. This law is believed to help the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Labor Department to better do their job and enforce the equal pay laws. Recently discussion of pay within the office is becoming more common and less taboo. Another way that this law is thought to work is also to help companies self-correct without the help of the government are by a lawsuit. The EEOC reports that women are only paid 79 cents on the dollars that the typical man does the gap is even wider for women of color.
The Equal employment opportunity act 1984 was passed through the Western Australian parliament in 1984 with the purpose of eliminating discrimination and promoting recognition and acceptance of men and women in the workplace. Some of the ways people can be discriminated against are due to sex, race, religion and age. During recruitment for example, employment should be awarded to the best candidate for the position and not because of sex, race, religion or age to name a few. When working we need to respect and accept our colleagues individuality's and treat them in a fair and professional way, treating them how we wish to be treated. If during employment an employee feels they have been treated less favourably then this can be grounds for a complaint to be made.
Jane Elliot, an elementary school teacher from a small, predominately white town in Iowa, brainstormed an experiment focusing on racism and the effects of discrimination on individuals. After the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968, Jane Elliot felt it was a perfect time to try this experiment when her students questioned why one would want to murder their “hero of the month.” To explain the reasoning of King’s assassination to the students, Mrs. Elliot created a two-day experiment to teach them a very important and unforgettable lesson on discrimination. Mrs. Elliot divided her class up based on the eye color of her students; the first day children with brown eyes were the inferior group that had to wear collars in order to clearly identify they were the “bad group,” while all the students with blue eyes were superior. On the second day the roles were reversed.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is a federal agency that administers and enforces civil rights laws against workplace discrimination. The EEOC has investigated cases of discrimination complaints based on an individual’s race, color, natural origin, religion, sex, age, disability, genetic informal and retaliation for reporting, and participating and/or opposing a discriminator practice since 2011. The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission which was establish by Congress, to enforce Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. With headquarters in Washington, DC and 50 filled offices nationwide, EEOC is the Federal Government’s premier civil rights agency.
Whistle-blowing Introduction Whistle-blowing is the act taken by an employee or former employee of disclosing what he believes to be unethical or illegal behaviour taken by his employer. There are two ways in which a person can disclose information. It can be done by internal whistle-blowing or external whistle-blowing. Internal whistle-blowing would be considered when an employee discloses unethical or illegal behaviour to higher management while external whistle-blowing would be when the information was disclosed to the public. The duty to be a whistle-blower over rides the duty that you have to your client or employer.
Diversity issues are critical element taken place within an individual. Diversity is defined as the state of being diverse which is expressed in beliefs and behaviors of individuals, families, communities and in societies. Issues related to age, gender, ethnicity, race, religion, culture, sexual orientation and disability can strongly affect a social worker’s assessment of a client as well as intervention chosen. Social –Economic Justice According to Barker (social work dictionary 2003) social justice is an ideal condition in which all members of a society have the same basic rights, protection, opportunities, obligations and social benefits.
This, in turn, lead to the incidental disclosure of Joseph Stevens’ health information. To help prevent this mistake in the future, Sue and the compliance officer should work together to institute training that educates employees on incidental disclosure and how to minimize the occurrence. Another aspect of this mistake, is that Sue did nothing to dissuade the nurse from continuing the discussion in front of the patient and in a public space. Sue should have invited the nurse to come to her office
Merriam-Webster defines dilemma as “a problem offering two possibilities, neither of which is unambiguously acceptable or preferable”. In the same context, ethical means “behaviors conforming to accepted standards of conduct”. Together, ethical dilemma implies a situation offering two unambiguously acceptable or preferable possibilities that involve conforming to accepted standards of conduct. This seemingly complicated and unrealistic concept, in fact, pervades every aspect of our culture. The first time I observed this concept was the day I watched the movie in the theater for the first time in my life.
The only other time that you should be able to disclose information would be when you have gotten consent from the patient that has told you the information. The opposing side of the argument has also said that the information should be able to be given out to anyone that inquires about it. I disagree with this stance because most information given in confidence should be kept confidential. If someone were to willingly share information with anyone that asks there could be consequences that come along with that. Some of these could be a child disclosing something that is happening at home to a medical professional and then the professional tells or confronts the parents or guardians of the child then things could and most likely will get worse for them at home.
Truth telling and confidentiality depend upon the situations. It is right to tell the truth in certain but it is also right to hide something from the patients in certain situations. According to utilitarianism one should usually tell the truth and keep one’s promise because you should always perform an action that provides maximum utility and if keeping a promise and telling the truth makes someone happy then it is providing maximum utility.
This decision is driven, in part, by the employee’s cognitive evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with each decision alternative (Keil, Tiwana, Sainsbury, and Sneha 2010).Those who take either of the last two routes are considered whistleblowers. Whistleblowers can report wrongdoings through either internal or external channels. Typically, whistleblowers will internally report a wrongdoing before exercising their external channel, but when they choose to use external channels of reporting, they are commonly portrayed negatively as a threat to the organization (Mesmer-Magnus and Viswesvaran 2005, 277-297). According to Fincher (2009) that there are three types of employees who become whistleblowers: senior executives (e.g., vice presidents, company attorney), professionals (e.g., quality control technicians, training instructors, engineers and human resource managers), and hourly workers (e.g., electricians and maintenance
One of those most challenging areas I have experience during my current placement is ethical decision-making. We studied many possible scenarios during our Values, Ethics and Professional Issues class, and discussed the various types of decision-making models to help guide us when having to make difficult decisions. While the class was invaluable, because it helped me identify my own biases, and also shed light on how I have made decisions in the past and how I can possibly make decisions in the future, I knew that having to make real-life decisions would not be so cut and dry. This placement has been challenging for me, because my ongoing assignment with one of my supervisors requires constant ethical decision-making, sometimes even in the
Wage Wars Protecting our basic civil rights in the United States is a recognizable value that all citizens want to obey or carry out. Civil rights are rooted on the idea of any citizen not receiving equal or fair treatment compared to the people around them. Although this is true, a major issue in today’s society that I have discovered revolves around the difference in gender equality and the gender wage gap in the workforce. Some people believe that females are not as capable as males causing a flux in the wages paid for the same job, however this is a stereotype that needs to be exterminated.