Essay Of Vaccination

H. L. Mencken once said and I quote, “For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.” Unfortunately, this is often the case when environmental and cultural views are discussed in relation to scientific advancement. I would argue, not only is society a large influence to scientific development but, it also leads to a lack of “actual” knowledge in relation to some subjects. Most often, people are less comfortable with the “unknown.” In addition, we often times require and “explanation” for those things we cannot grasp. Habitually we tend to find these “answers” in relatable sources as opposed to realistic sources. Now days everyone is a critic instead of requiring research based evidence, as a society we have accepted the concept of “well it sounds good, therefore it is!” Take for instances, vaccinations there is a large “society” developed that contesting the positive effects of vaccinations while also implying harm as a result of this process. This debate dates back to the era of Dr. Jenner’s research in 1790’s. While objective data

One of our fellow classmates made a striking statement. Cassy, suggested that wanted to be known for a “cure” in some ways hindered the development of microbiology back in 18th and 19th century. I would add, in addition to being known for a “cure” scientist also wanted to be recognized for discovery of “causative factors” as well. In 1998 a gastroenterologist by the name of Dr. Andrew Wakefield published an article which suggested that autism was directly linked to vaccinations administered to young children. This false notation was later discredited and resulted in his license to practice medication to be revoked. Whether Wakefield intentionally or non-intentionally misrepresented the facts, this information spread like wildfire, adding to if not fueling the “new age” speculation of vaccinations. (park,