1. WHAT IS BYSTANDER INTERVENTION? Bystander intervention (BI) is a primary prevention strategy that empowers bystanders to actively intervene, either directly or indirectly, when they see, hear, or otherwise recognize signs of inappropriate behaviors or unsafe situations to prevent harm. BI seeks to empower Sailors of all ranks to step up and step in when they interpret events or behaviors counter to Navy’s core values and the Navy ethos. Bystander Intervention to the Fleet (BI2F) has brought bystander intervention awareness, terminology, and techniques to the entire fleet. Servicemembers also receive BI training at “A” school and in leadership training. For more information on the SAPR Program, visit: http://cnic.navy.mil/ffr/family_readiness/fleet_and_family_support_program/sexual_assault_prevention_and_response.html.
2. GOVERNMENT MIILITARY TRAINING (GMT) APPLICATIONS (APPS). Two new mobile apps designed for Sailors to complete required Navy General Military Training (GMT) on Records Management (RM) and Privacy and Personally Identifiable Information (PII) Awareness became available April 19, 2016. To find the free Navy apps, search "Privacy and Personally Identifiable Information" "PII" and "Records
…show more content…
CHART THE COURSE. Chart the Course (CTC) training is designed to empower Sailors to recognize professional and responsible behavior, and inspire them to work and live in accordance with the Navy Core Values and Navy Ethos. Training will serve as a Navigation Plan to help Sailors recognize admirable decision-making and professional behavior when faced with challenging circumstances and/or situations. CTC training will commence Fleet-wide in Jan 2016. The CTC Task Force will deploy Master Mobile Training Teams (MMTT) to Fleet areas to train unit-level Command Facilitators (CF). Command-level training will consist of peer-led, small group discussions facilitated by CFs. All Sailors must complete this training no later than 30 September
The Staff Ride will be conducted focusing on Team 1 Medical, Team 2 Miscellaneous Briefings: Plantation house, Kitchen and laundry house, Dairy house and Smoke house, Epps family conclusion, Team 3 Communication, Team 4 Quartermaster Supply and Transportation, Team 5 Security and Intelligence, Ordnance Wharf Explosion and Military Railroad. Phase IV: NLT 291430OCT15 2LT Garcia will conduct an AAR to identify sustainment and improvements. c. Task to Subordinate Units: PL will maintain accountability, identify water point. SL will ensure Officers are signaling with right hand for all uneven
Command Expectations of a Military Intelligence Sergeant First Class Being promoted in the United States military to the rank of Sergeant First Class is the first step that a Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) takes into the senior enlisted ranks. With this promotion comes a new set of responsibilities from a command’s perspective. Until this point in the career of an NCO, their respective focus has been to a team or squad. The expectations of a junior or mid-level NCO to their team or squad are often basic accountability, personnel task management, and dissemination of information. Taking the next step from Staff Sergeant into the realm of Senior NCO as a Sergeant First Class means more direct involvement with the command team of a unit and additional
Bystander Now that the school year has started, People see it every day, People see others getting hurt, Yet people choose they have nothing to say. When you walk past your locker, You see a big boy taunting an innocent, You quickly glance and decide it’s not your business,
Bystander behaviour can generally be described as the actions people take when they witness an emergency situation in a public place. There have been many studies on bystander behaviour, this essay will explore two approaches to explain this behaviour. It will look at the experimental method performed by Latané and Darley and at the discourse analysis done by Levine. First the essay will describe and outline the methods.after that it will examine the similarities as well as the contrast between those techniques. Latané and Darley did their research on bystander behaviour in the aftermath of the murder case of Catherine `Kitty´ Genovese,which happened in the Suburbs of New York in 1964.
he NCO 2020 strategy is focused on creating a system that will provide the NCOs with access to develop and broadening the experiences needed in both garrison and within operational environment. In addition, leaders will individually help to commit to long-term careers, which will be essentially focused on the development of educational, professional and with the fulfillment of having a ready force for war at all times. Essentially the strategy of the NCO 2020 is to have leaders at all levels understanding that the development of Soldiers must be constant and continuous throughout their career. The best way to expand and provide better NCO development is by focusing on proficiency in each Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) and leadership
I have been stationed at both Fort Campbell, Tennesee and Fort Benning Gerorgia. As an NCO, I was held accountable for ensuring that there were adequate training aids to train soldiers so that the unit can maintain proficiency in certain areas. While many soldiers have creative ways of coming up with training aids, there are available resources at many Army instillations that provide suitable tools to assist in your training. Many soldiers are unaware of these resources, which was evident in my journey to find these assets. Observation: The Training Support Center (TSC) is a great place that provides training aids to support units in all their training activities; however, they are not well know across Army instillations.
Two major approaches when studying bystander behaviour are discourse analysis and experimental method. Latané & Darley and Levine have contributed to psychological study into this matter, using these different methods of experimentation to reach conclusions regarding the bystander effect. This essay will begin by describing the different uses of evidence in both methods. Furthermore, it will discuss what these methods have in common, for they equally attempt to understand why bystander behaviour occurs, and the reasons that they differ. It will examine why each method is a useful way of analysing human behaviour, and the similarities in the limited demographics used by these particular psychologists.
Based off of the bystander effect Latane and Darley (1970) came up with a five-step psychological model that explained the thought process of bystanders. For a bystander to intervene they need to notice the situation, acknowledge that the situation is an emergency, feel that they have a personal responsibility to step in and help, believe that they can successfully help in the situation, and decide to take action and help. Along with these steps three thought processes were thought to be the reason for interference with the decision to intervene. Diffusion of responsibility, the more bystanders there are witnessing an event the more likely a bystander is to assume that someone else will help and they feel the responsibility will be assumed by someone else. Evaluation apprehension is the second thought process, it is a fear of being judged by others publicly which keeps people from stepping in and helping.
The Bystander Effect In today's modern era when some event or accident occurs, there is a high probability that someone out there will take a picture or record a video without helping. That is what is known as a bystander--a person that is present but doesn’t take action. It’s believed that some people don’t take a stand because they are afraid of all the negative outcomes of involvement, even if it means helping someone. For instance while a person could be doing CPR they could break the other person’s ribs and get sued or the person’s relative could complain about it and ask for that person to pay for the medical expenses.
As social media use increases, the bystander effect becomes more common amongst younger generations. The bystander effect is a psychological experience, where witnesses refrain from helping another, as a result of the presence of others. In this new age, it has become very popular to record almost every aspect of our daily lives, from a baby’s birth to the last moments of a victims life. With popular social media outlets like Twitter and Instagram, it has become normal to post individuals fighting or partaking in reckless activities. However, this raises the question,“ if these recording bystanders had intervened or reached out for help, would they still have a video to post ?”
Help! When someone hears this word, they usually look around to see who is yelling it and why. As a bystander to an incident of a stranger calling for help, a lot of people keep walking or turn the other way as if they never heard a word. If a situation does not personally affect the bystander, many people are inconsiderate as to helping a stranger. Many factors are involved in a situation to determine if a bystander should help or not.
(Introduction) The bystander Effect (literally the passer-by effect) can be defined as the dispersion of responsibility that can occur during an emergency situation when people are in a group. The first Study about this effect took place after the murder, in March 1964, of Catherine Genovese (aka Kitty), that on her way home one evening after work, was stabbed to death and then raped in front of her house. This murder caused quite a stir as it turned out that there was at least 38 witnesses present or at least nearby.
The bystander effect states that during an occurrence or a crisis, the more observers there are, the less
A bystander is worse than a bully because the bully has problems at home which is leading to his or her bullying a bystander doesn’t has a reason for nut putting up with the bully. A bystander is someone who watches the bullying happen for no reason. A bystander is worse than a bully because the bystander has to live with the guilt of knowing that they could have stopped it but didn’t which could lead to teen suicide.
Kendra Cherry says, “the presence of other people creates a diffusion of responsibility. ”("Glimpses of the Genovese Effect." ) If the bystander is alone they feel the sole responsibility to act but, but if there is a group of bystanders it is implied that the responsibility to act is shared. It is as if everybody thinks someone else is going to act in an emergency, so therefore no one ends up acting. Bibb Latane and John Darley in their experiment concluded that, “as the number of bystanders increased, so too did the likelihood that no one would help.”