Organic Foods Vs Conventional Foods Essay

773 Words4 Pages

Organic products are sold at an increased price compared to the common conventional fruits and vegetables sold in stores around the world. However, most people don’t think they deserve to be priced any higher than those ordinary conventional products. There isn’t even that much of a difference between the two. Organic foods are not worth it because there isn’t any difference in quality, the markup on them is way too high, and there are only small differences in nutritional value.
In organic foods, there isn’t a big difference, if any, in quality compared to conventionally grown foods. The prices of certain organics aren’t justified for just a small difference in quality. “ ‘I don’t think there’s a big enough difference in quality to justify the prices’... …show more content…

“Benbrook notes… ‘There are only modest differences in the nutrient profile of organic versus conventional cucumbers or lettuce.’” (Cernansky). Just like in the quality aspect, there are only small differences in nutrition between organic and conventional products. Organic foods can be better than conventional ones, but only in some categories. Conventional foods are rich in some nutrients, organic in others. Buying organic products doesn’t really mean you’ll get more health benefits than you would with conventional products. For example, the pesticide content in conventional produce is higher than it is in organic produce, but it is still at a very safe level. “Herzig said, ‘Buying organic does not necessarily mean there’s more health and nutrition benefits, … The pesticide content will be higher with conventional produce, but it’s still at safe levels.’” (Lazarus). Going organic isn’t really worth it just because it is rich in one nutrient, but conventional foods aren’t rich in that particular nutrient. However, the people who oppose this idea believe that organic produce is the worth the extremely high

Open Document