According to the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) 17 percent (12.7 million) of the children (ages 2 - 19) in the United States are obese. 35.9 percent of the adult population in America are obese. How can we prevent this? Regulating the food for the next generation of Americans can help lower the obesity rate and the diabetes percentage of 25.9. One way to resolve the problem is to lower the saturated fats and over processed food items and replace them with organic and less processed foods.
The problem we have in the LUSD is that mostly all of our breakfast and lunch food items are over processed and frozen. The food that is given to the students is high in saturated fats because of the meats and cheese and high in sugar levels because of the drinks and other food items given. Another part of the problem is the snacks sold in most LUSD schools which consists of artificially sugared candy,saturated fat chips, and sugary drinks.The high levels of sugar also affect the student and their learning environment by them losing concentration when high levels of sugar are in the blood. Although LUSD does offer
…show more content…
The total estimation of the National School Lunch Program is of nine million dollars. Serving healthier more organic lunches can be a bit more expensive but, the results overweight the cost. The healthier the future generations eat the less health care services they will need in their lives. One question that is set on the table is how can we pay for all these extra changes in the National School Lunch Program. The answer is simple, according to The Atlantic, the United States spends an incredible seven hundred and fifty billion dollars in health services annually. Even if the total cost of the NSLP quadruples in costs the amount in health services spent by the United States would decrease
Ariana Cha combats a seriously pressing topic in her writing. While many articles are very quick to bash the school lunch program, while this article can enforce it. Cha is supporting the most common argument with the school lunch program, nutritional content. Cha is stating that the nutrients are offered, but are not being accepted by the students. The audience intended for this reading is, literally, anybody that disagrees with the provided meals.
Another solution that could be implemented to solve school lunch debt is by providing free meals. By providing free meals to students, they are able to have the exact meals as their peers, parents will not have to worry about finding the funds to pay for school lunches, moreover students are having their nutritional needs met, which is essential to their development. Despite how simple this may sound, this can easily impact local businesses as a result of a decline of how much product that is being sold. According to an article written by Denise-Marie Ordway, “Food purchases decline by an estimated $11 per month, on average, among households with children located in the same zip code as the school offering universal free meals” (Ordway, Section 16). Due to the fact that it wastes food, declines sales in grocery stores, and costs more taxes, this is another solution that is not the best for this particular issue, but can also be used as a potential solution in the
Finally, students' taste preferences are cited as abarrier to consumption of school meals that adhereto the new
As I walked into the cafeteria, I caught a whiff of the food being prepared in the cafeteria and thought to myself, “Why can’t we go off-campus to get lunch?” While SLA, the lunch program at Catholic High, provides the school lunches, there could be an alternative solution to this. Unfortunately, students are detained at school during lunch hours and are not able to leave campus during lunch forcing them to be served by SLA or bring their own lunch. If Catholic High School were to introduce an open-campus lunch, students and faculty would benefit greatly. While SLA does provide the lunch at CHS, they do not live up to their standard of “high quality, nutritious, and cost efficient”.
Is the money you are paying for lunch really worth it? Our district has been losing a lot of money when they were in control of our school lunch prices. So our Board of Education hired Aramark to break even... But at what cost? Many families are spending hundreds of dollars per year on just one student.
Are School Lunches Really Healthy For You? Imagine going to school and thinking, oh boy what am I going to have for lunch today? And all of the sudden you see something you don’t like, so you don’t eat it and then your stomach starts to growl.
I think school lunches are horrible, and lunch ladies should be replaced with good cooks, and should give us kids more food. Many kids are still hungry after lunch because they give us very small portions of food. All the lunch ladies do is put food in the oven or microwave, the school district should have real cooks making our food so it tastes good. Kids will not be starving after lunch if the district gives us more food. More kids will buy the school lunch instead of bringing cold lunches, if the school had good cooks, and made good food.
Determining the healthiness of food being served to students during school lunches is a very important subject. Although eating healthy is important it should not be the only factor contributing to whether or not taking away students favorite school lunches is beneficial. I don't believe that it is a good idea to take away students favorite school lunches and replacing them with all healthy foods is a good idea because of these three reasons. One, the cost of the healthier food, two, the student environment and mood of the school, and three, the fairness to the students whose only meal is the lunch they receive at school.
Intro Name: Natasha Torres In the nonfiction article, “ Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough?” by McClatchy-Tribune News Service. This article is about how the first lady wants to change school lunches to be healthier for children although the school nutrition do not like her campaign. Michelle Obama’s program should be banned because the school’s lunch is already healthy enough for example, some people are grossed out by the school lunches, some are disappointed, and some say parent can not be trusted.
Did you know that the biden-harris administration invested 80 million in grants for schools to invest in new food service equipment This topic about school lunches is important to discuss because we see that even though the food is healthier we see that a lot of the students don't eat it, and when their is smart slices of domino's we see that the lines in school are long, because it's something that people want to eat, While some argue that school lunches should not change, school lunches should be changed because they have small proportions and they are expensive. I think that the school lunches that they give should be changed, because the lunch is the biggest part of the day and a bad lunch can ruin it, even if it has to be healthy there's a lot of other stuff that is healthy in other stuff, also we see that sometimes the food is overcooked or undercooked, and it takes to long for you to get the food, and when you get it lunch is basically over, According to Sophia Lang “The high school I graduated from in Indiana consisted of a two-period, 45-minute lunchtime block. We had a number of lunch lines but people in them were never evenly distributed, resulting in lines that went up the stairs and through the doors. My friends and I complained frequently. When more than half of that time is spent waiting, the remaining time to eat becomes close to none,""School lunches encourage students to develop
Should School Lunches Change For a long time now people have been arguing over whether or not to change up the restrictions to the lunches served in schools across America. Many different arguments have come up in recent years. School officials should not change up the school lunches because some people need more food than others, they should not be able to tell them what they can and can't eat, and finally because it will take lots of time and money to make the switch. The first reason schools should not put a limit on school lunches because some students need more food than others.
The school lunches impacting more than just the schools money, it’s impacting the students education and after school activities just like sports teams. First of all ,students are getting bad grades because they aren’t eating anything at school because the school lunches are disgusting. For an example, in a Perspective Flip Book called “School Lunches: Healthy Choices VS. Crowd Pleasers” it states:“The new dietary guidelines left
To begin with, the taste alone of school lunches is beyond unsatisfactory. The meals provided by public schools are not appetizing. There exists a tangible disconnect between the enticing, nutritious meals advertised on the school board’s menus and what the students actually receive—pathetic portions and lukewarm meals slapped onto a tray. Children’s complaints about school lunches are often seen as trite. However, while common, they are not any less accurate.
Imagine a school that has multiple healthy school food options, that is worth standing in line for. I think that all schools should have a healthy school lunch. It's very important to have nutritious school lunches so that we can be healthy and have energy during the school day. I think we should have better and healthier school menus. Our school menus are very high in cholesterol and saturated fat.
Yes we most definitely have healthier school lunches there would be no more bullying,active kids, and no obese kids. It would be amazing if the school lunches could be healthy. It would also be a life changing thing for all of the obese kids in the world. There are many kids in the world that are obese. We don’t need school lunches making them obese to.