Lasting 500 years with the republic and roughly a thousand and five hundred more with the Roman empire, the Roman Army was an extremely effective fighting force. Creating new tactics, some still used to this day, the ancient Romans were able to conquer most of Europe, northern sections of Africa and parts of the Middle East. With a complex chain of command, adaptability, formations and equipment, the Roman armies were the best for their time.
In the beginning of the first Roman army, the Romans followed the Greek Phalanx formation, a rectangular formation made up of heavy infantry units. In the 4th century the Romans changed the Phalanx formation and renamed it the Triplex Acies, or triple line (Ricketts, Colin). Although similar, instead of
…show more content…
There are sixteen known ranks, Tirones being a new recruit and the lowest and Consul, the highest rank possible. A Munifex was the lowest rank for a legionary, or a Roman citizen in the army, and men of this rank were led by a Decanus in eight man groups called a tent party. Ten tent parties, eighty men, formed a Century, commanded by a Centurion. Six Centuries created a cohort with 480 men total (Alchin, Linda). Ten Cohorts combined with a calvary force, created a legion. A Legatus Legionis commanded the entire legion, or roughly 5,000 men, in battle and usually was a senator. A Consul was an elected military and civil leader. The chain of command the Romans created alongside their ranks shows some similarities to modern militaries. This chain of command gave clear roles to every Roman soldier and offered benefits such as wages and possible land. With this chain of command, the Romans also created standard battle commands. Instead of having different commands for every Cohort or Legion, the Roman army was able to introduce standard commands so any group of Roman soldiers could cooperate and communicate effectively in battle. Both standardized commands and a chain of command made the Roman army extremely successful against organized enemy
As Rome’s government began to change, the leadership became much less consistent. According to a chart compiled from various resources that lists the Roman emperors between 235 BCE and 285 BCE (Document 1), a majority of these emperors ruled for roughly two to three years, however some reigned for as little as or less than a year and some as much as seven to eight years. This constant change in leadership left the Roman army questioning their leadership often times more devoted to their earnings than to the man paying them. These leaders became careless as time went on, as stated in Vegetius’ Concerning Military Matters (Document 2), and the conflicting and constantly changing opinions on military strategy left the rigor and morale of the army in shambles. He states “...because of negligence and laziness, parade ground drills were abandoned, the customary armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it.
The Roman empire was a prosperous empire that flourished between the years 27 BC - 476 AD. However, there were many internal and external factors that contributed to the fall of the Roman empire. Some internal factors that contributed to the fall of the Roman empire included their financial strains, and the people starting to distrust each other. Some external factors that contributed to the downfall of the Roman empire include constant pressure from the northern world, and Rome’s army not being able to compete with other armies.
The great Western Roman Empire was considered to be one of the most powerful empires in human history. Rome became the most powerful state in the world by the first century BCE through a combination of military might, political acumen, and economic might. The empire was founded on blood of two brother’s who fought to the death to be crowned King, which lead to the first King of Rome who was named Romulus. By the third century BCE, all of Rome’s power and greatness began to diminish. Rome was falling.
Many people think of Rome as a great empire. Nevertheless, the Roman empire had more flaws than what one would think. Rome began around 750 BCE as a simple town. By 200 BCE, Rome was a powerful empire. The empire lasted for about 1,226 years before its “fall” in 476 CE.
A successful empire needed a military group to expand and defend against marauders. Without the strong military group, the expansion of an empire wouldn’t be possible. When the military warriors decided to leave their armor behind, it represented their lost determination to win battles for the Roman Empire. Therefore, the Roman Army played an important role in sustaining the Roman Empire. Because of their foolish choice to no longer be determined to protect and save the lives of others by giving up their breastplates and helmets greatly damaged the Roman Empire’s strength and changed many invaders’ perspectives and viewpoints encouraging them to contribute to the fall of Rome.
Each regiment carried one eagle. The eagle was gravely important to the Roman military. Because it was not just a symbol of a legion but represented there values and futility. Losing a standard was considered a serious and terrible offense, the Roman military often went to great measures to protect a standard and to reclaim or recover it if lost. For example, after the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest, the Romans spent years trying to recover the lost flags of three regiments.
So because of the Roman soldier being replaced by German mercenaries and the stoppage of expansion the Roman military lost its power. When the invasions of the western tribes came and destroyed Rome, there was nothing they could
The nature of Roman society and in particular the army was highly evident in the choice of the gladius as the primary fighting weapon. Without every soldier performing their role effectively, ensuring no weak space in
Importance of Rank Structure “Military ranks are a system of hierarchical relationships in armed forces, police, intelligence agencies or other institutions organized along military lines. Military ranks and the military rank system define among others dominance, authority, as well as roles and responsibility in a military hierarchy. The military rank system incorporates the principles of exercising power and authority, and the military chain of command – the succession of commanders superior to subordinates through which command is exercised – constructs an important component for organized collective action.”
Augustus Caesar established the Roman Empire in 31 B.C.E. after inheriting the throne from his great-uncle, Julius Caesar. At the time of his rising to power Rome was in shambles due to multiple civil wars. In order to bring unification back to Rome, “Augustus allied with Marc Antony to reunify Rome by killing off most of its enemies in two of the bloodiest battles in the history of the Roman Empire” (Blackwell). Through many hard fought and costly battles Augustus never gave up however, and pushed his forces to keep on fighting.
They also wore arm pads and a plate to cover their back. While they had weapons and strategies, their soldiers were the most important asset to their military because they protected the land and the empire. Ancient Roman military was the most successful and powerful military in history. Ancient Roman soldiers also used a variety of weapons, including a
The military function and sociopolitical value went together. " Later, wealthy Romans who served on their own mounts -equites equis suis - began to supplement the force of the equites equo publico" (McCall, 134). These cavalrymen who provided their own horses were in the equestrian census, but did not possess voting rights in the centuriate assembly. Although with minor disparity in political rights, the citizen cavalrymen "formed one undifferentiated pool of cavalry recruits" (McCall, 149).
The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion
This was normally given to generals, magistrate when the republic felt threatened by outside nations and cities which gave a single person great power to be able to eliminate a threat of which after they were supposed to return the power back to the Senate and the Roman people. Caesar was given this power many times which he declined, but noteworthy is the year 48 BC when this power was given to him for an indefinite time as Dictator Perpetuo. It was unsettling to all government factions and the people since they lacked the power anymore and such power could lead to wrong choices by someone and in this case Julius Caesar (Bobertz, 2022). He was victorious in the many wars that he led as a dictator and general , which helped him gain prominence and tactic in taking over a republic under his
The Roman armies used to be comprised of volunteers but after being defeated, they were determined to make their army better. They did this through vigorous trainings. Roman soldiers called legionaries, were forced to march for long distances carrying heavy loads. Every year, senior military officers, called Tribunes, would select the strongest men to be part of the army. In the end, the Romans became professional in fighting and had one of the most disciplined armies.