“Faster, fatter, bigger, and cheaper” epitomizes the motto of today’s food industry. The food industry has changed, more so in the last eighty years. The monopoly corporations’ main goals are to achieve substantial wealth and to massively produce a product. The workers who perform the labor get treated like the animals doomed for slaughter. The farmers have a small say in the job he or she is doing; however, what choice do they have? The majority of farmers are in debt due to purchasing the continued technology advances brought on by the corporations that hired them. The food industry consists of a small number of monopolies. Three or four companies own roughly 80% of the entire food industry and most of the thirteen slaughterhouses. Absolute …show more content…
Robert Kenner shows in his film that corporations only care about the end goal of producing the product, not the food nor the workers.
The industry acts as a double edged sword. The products the corporation yields to feed the citizens are not quite the healthiest. Food Inc. displays the grinding of the meat and several ammonia cleanings. The traditional way of industry that many people attest to is contrary to reality. The film uses pathos in combination with ethos. Two key interviews that specify the usage of this rhetoric are the chicken farmer and the organic farmer. These two individuals are alike in many ways, but are also different. Both slaughter their animals and sell them; the only difference is each one has a different process, outlook, and end goal. Both of them are credible farmers and therefore represent the ethos rhetoric. The pathos rhetoric is more represented with a negative connotation. The organic farmer describes and talks to his animals as just that, animals. He explains how he feeds them grass
…show more content…
Also, a woman who is now an advocate for safer food industry laws and regulations lost her son due to a bad hamburger. Why do the companies spend so much effort into making the animals healthy, yet not the product that is distributed to the consumers? These two interviews are vital as both use important images and concepts to relate to the overall plot. The female chicken farmer shows the brutality and demands of a chicken farm. This footage shows what ALL the major companies in discussion denied to show. The other key aspect is the woman. The film jerks at the audience’s emotions as the woman, with tears in her eyes, began the story of losing her son. The home movie of the family vacation at the beach plays in the background as the woman tells her story. This combines with the somber music and shifts the mood. It shifts the mood, but also changes the food industry from being the good guy food supplier to one who does not care for the consumers. But what is one supposed to
The objective of the film was to influence viewers to switch to a plant-based diet while avoiding animal consumption. Anderson and Kuhn utilize various visual techniques and rhetorical appeals to ethos and logos to support their argument that the causes of many diseases can be linked back to diet. While the film uses clear rhetorical techniques to present its argument, the overall argument is ineffective due to its broad claim and distorted presentation of positions. The first rhetorical strategy used by the film that will be analyzed is the appeal to pathos. An example of this would be the woman crying because she has to take medicine for the rest of her life.
Pathos is implemented in the essay when the author talks about gay marriage, tapping into the audience’s values and beliefs along with emotions. He also plays with emotions talking about the injustices in society and fighting corporate America, giving readers a sense of patriotism. Graham redefines terms in the text that make his bias seem more reliable, along with using loaded language to give additional sentiment. Ethos is not established until the end of the article, where there is a box showing the author’s long list of experience, making him seem more
For many decades the food system was an endless controversial issue on how our food was processed and the impertioness. This issue influenced Upton Sinclair who wrote a book called “The Jungle”, which exposed the secrets of the meat industry and unsanity poor conditions of the slaughterhouses, indeed, this book inspired president Roosevelt right into action for solutions for the problem, with great struggle the meat inspection Act of 1906 came into law. Till today many reformers and authors are exposing the large corporations that have full control over the food production and how fast foods had a huge affect on families all over the world. For example, Fast Food Nation, Food Inc, and Fast Food Babies had one aim and that was to bring awareness
Food production is a representation of social and political climates in the way that capitalism negatively affects the life of immigrants, the quality of food, and the safety of the public. A great example of the faults of food production is the novel, The Jungle. Written by muckraking journalist, Upton Sinclair, The Jungle is a factual retelling of a Lithuanian immigrant family’s struggle to get by in the Chicago, Illinois meatpacking district, Packingtown. Another example of the effects of food production on the public, and the government’s involvement with it, is the New York Times article, “When a Crop Becomes King” by Michael Pollan. “When a Crop Becomes King” is an informative article that dissects the ramification of corn on the environment,
Although its goal of turning America into a socialist society was forgotten, it served as one of the most efficient propaganda pieces on the meat packing industry. A century later the documentary Food, Inc. was produced for the same purpose of drawing attention to the food industry as a whole. Although monopolies on the meat industry have increased after being broken up and food workers treatment is similar to those in The Jungle, there are now more government regulations in place, ensuring food safety to a
Since the dawn of the scientific revolution, historical advances has been made for the pursuit of a finer and a stronger understanding of life. But, not all advancements has benefited our society. Former President Dwight D. Eisenhower addressed concerns regarding these developments in his “Farewell Address” speech. As his final speech as president, he leaves his audience with a message that may have shocked some listeners. Not to mention he also gave his thoughts on how we should go about solving our issues as a nation.
The opinions of the reader could be altered once their heart is open to the author. Additionally, Food, Inc. emphasizes the loss of a young boy due to a previously nonexistent disease created by the food industry (Kenner 31:22). This shows the audience the lack of remorse the industry feels towards the child’s death and tugs at the viewer’s heartstrings, pleading for them to take action. The story of Kevin, the young boy who died of E. coli, was only added to inflict hurt into the audience’s heart, making pathos the only reason the story was
Joel Salatin, the Polyface Farms owner, has a strong opinion on how necessary it is to have a healthy area for animals to be raised in order for everyone to have food on their tables that was well taken care of. Salatin is arguing the fact that organic animals should be used among all Americans. Within the video, the farm owner uses pathos by stating the fact the chickens never see chlorine on his farm and do not get plump as they do in large factories. Along with that, Joel brought up the fact that the cows are able to graze the farms and fertilize on their own rather than having machine made products. On top of pathos, the speaker uses ethos to catch the audiences attention.
Michael Pollan’s alternative to Factory farming has given a huge insight into a better ethics on food. In “The Animals: Practicing Complexity” Michael Pollan writes about a polyface farm and how it works. The goal of a polyface farm is to emotionally, economically, and environmentally enhance agriculture. Everything on a polyface farm has the potential to be helpful to something else on the farm. Pollan states “The chicken feed not only feeds the broilers but, transformed into chicken crap, feeds the grass that feeds the cows that, as I was about to see, feeds the pigs and the laying hens” (Pollan 345).
The writers accurately depict ethos because they represent multiple viewpoints and they have connected themselves to the topic. Pathos is used in the document because they expressed their emotions for
People of America were utterly disgusted by the uncleanliness of the production of the food they ate. “I aimed at the public's heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach” (“Muckrakers” 121). America felt betrayed and were confused by the lack of empathy or care given by major meatpacking companies. Public outcry over the contamination of their food was not fully supported by the person that incited it because he intended for the attention to go towards the terrible conditions that the workers in production industries go through. Their customers sought to seek regulation of the meatpacking industry due to the contamination of their food.
This film uses visual images, along with ethos, logos, and pathos to help uncover the corrupt side of the food industry. The beginning of the documentary spans around the inside of a grocery store that displays colorful, fresh looking fruits and vegetables in the produce section. Along with various choice of meats that
The food industry has better improvements yet; it still needs a thorough cleansing. Although food production has bettered in the last 100 years by its treatment of workers and government’s oversight, it has had some adverse effects like company’s protection
In the world, there are one billion people undernourished and one and a half billion more people overweight. In this day and age, where food has become a means of profit rather than a means of keeping people thriving and healthy, Raj Patel took it upon himself to explore why our world has become the home of these two opposite extremes: the stuffed and the starved. He does so by travelling the world and investigating the mess that was created by the big men (corporate food companies) when they took power away from the little men (farmers and farm workers) in order to provide for everyone else (the consumers) as conveniently and profitably as possible. In his book Stuffed and Starved: The Hidden Battle for the World Food System, Patel reveals his findings and tries to reach out to people not just as readers, but also as consumers, in hopes of regaining control over the one thing that has brought us all down: the world food system.
Countless social issues within America today can be traced back to the food industry. Although