Gratifying Destruction: The Dualism of Ambition Ambition is a release from our own passivity. The drive to achieve that it instills within us delivers us from the wretchedness that is to be left wanting, and waiting. Innately, it is a life-giver; a breath of fresh air for us to breathe. Sometimes, however, it propels us to blindly siphon out the air resting in another’s lungs, our will to secure what we desire so strong that it hinders us from recognizing how others can become casualties in our pursuit. In the play The Crucible by Arthur Miller, it is explored how the pursuit of one’s ambition can drive an individual to gratification. However, if the individual pursues their ambition without regard for the wellbeing of others, they may condemn …show more content…
John begins his quest of seeking “goodness” within himself by standing against Abigail Williams and her supporters in court. He is fueled by a want for atonement after his affair with Abigail. Although at the beginning of the play he has no way to pursue it, this desire manifests as an ambition to align with “his own vision of decent conduct” (pg. 20), meaning to prove to himself that there is still good within him. To John, goodness is defined as an unhypocritical character; a person who practices the Christian morality they preach. The manifestation of this ambition without proper means of its pursual leaves him feeling as if he is some “kind of a fraud” (pg. 21). However, this changes with Elizabeth Proctor’s arrest. Because John is of the opinion that Elizabeth is a good person, he maintains the belief that by standing against the injustice that is her arrest, he will have done the morally correct thing. In doing so, he will have achieved his goal, since only someone who is of decent character would speak against a wrong, and see it fixed. Elizabeth was also the most wronged by John’s affair with Abigail. In saving …show more content…
Because of this, he consigns them to a future of suffering. The prominence he has as a respected figure in town is well known to all in the play, to the point where Parris professes that John’s signed confession “‘will strike the village’” (pg. 141). In this, it is evident that Parris is aware that if John confesses, others will follow. The townspeople of Salem have the overall impression of John Proctor as a good man, and if he were to confess to a sin such as witchcraft, it is likely that the townspeople would look more scrutinously towards the doings of the court. Propriety of the court may be brought under further investigation, fueled by John’s confession and the rumors of rebellion in Andover. Though it can not concretely be said that John’s confession would bring forth this course of action, his position in the town, and the town’s growing discontent with the court, is indicative of its strong possibility. If these events were to pass, the likelihood of the accused being let off due to the dissolution of the court, brought upon by the townspeople of Salem, would be significant. The reputations of the accused, living and dead, confessed and mute, would be restored. Nonetheless, these events never come to pass. John’s declination of signing the confession ensures this, and it brings upon him his own death, as well as that of
However, this is inaccurate because he avoids Abigail and risks everything for his wife. Elizabeth was taken by the court because she was accused for being a witch, but John knows she is a good women and fights for her. Elizabeth is worth the trouble of going to the court and defying the government. It is honorable for a husband to protect his wife after all they are family. John is talking to the court and tell the court a secret that no one knows about, John’s reputation is on the line.
Similarities and differences of those characters actions show whether they believe a good name or the truth is more important. A sinful yet passionate man, John Proctor knows he has wronged his wife and lied to many. Proctor committed Adultery with Abigail Williams and had his heart set on not letting a soul know about it. John lied constantly to try and keep his good name until it came down to life or death for his wife, Elizabeth Proctor.
At first, John decides that he will confess so that his children will have a father, and so that his wife will not be alone. He proclaims: “ I will have my life.” As John confesses, he realizes that he must sign a document to be hung over the church door in order to convince other convicted people to confess. John knows that he has not practiced witchcraft and the thought of having his name on the church for all of the town to see completely horrifies him. His name has already been stained by Abigail, and he did not want there to be any other reason for his name to be black.
In Arthur Miller's play, The Crucible, the characters' motivations seem to be corrupt. Taking a persons life away or saving it, is what motivation can do. The people of Salem tend to use it for there own personal gain instead of helping others. This can be traced back to Thomas Putnam's greed, Mary Warren's fear and Abigail William's lust to falsely accuse there neighbors of witchcraft.
In moments of desperation, people often turn to extreme measures in order to warp dire situations in their favor. Arthur Miller, in his play The Crucible, implies that hypocrisy arises as a result of people trying to preserve their integrity, position, and public status. Miller uses characters like Danforth, Parris, Proctor, and Abigail to personify the effects of selfishness over honesty and solidarity over community. Despite their strict Puritan roots, these characters stray from the socially accepted norms to secure their positions, status, and reputations.
Parris uses Proctor’s disparity towards his ministry against him. This way, it seems to the court that the failure is not in his teachings, but instead John’s failure to attend. He very much refuses to believe that John Proctor is solely trying to save his wife, instead of taking the court down which, through Abigail, is directly related to him. By insisting that “this is a clear
When John says this, it is a way of seeing how important John's reputation is to himself, and how much pride he takes in his name. At the end of Act IV, when the court is trying to have Proctor sign the confession papers, his pride is shown again when he refuses to sign off his name. John Proctor would rather die than have a bad reputation ultimately proving his priorities and
Proctor thought that a way for stopping the trials was to make a document with statements of the townspeople that revealed that many of the accused were good puritans; however the judges did not care, “Mr. Cheever have warrants drawn for all of these – arrest for examination”(87). Danforth assured Proctor that if they were good people they would be fine, but as we’ve seen before, once you’re accused you're going to be condemned, either by death or jail. In fact, when Reverend Hale proposed the idea that “not everyone accused is part of it. ”(91), Danforth said, "No uncorrupted man may fear this court, Mister Hale! None!
John Proctor's character actions demonstrate the start of his descent into his transformation. In act one, John Proctor visits Reverend Parris's house where commotion is in play, Abigail attempts to converse with him but he sets “her firmly out of his path”, this is because Abigail, the niece of Reverend Parris, was John Proctor’s mistress seven months ago. The reader knows that Proctor and his wife Elizabeth have been going through problems in their marriage due to Proctor’s infidelity. This adulterous sin of Proctors is reason enough for him to change his ways and start on his path of honesty to not only find forgiveness within his relationship, but also find forgiveness within himself. He no longer wishes to betray his wife or feel the weight of the guilt.
Despite Proctor’s adulterous affair with Abigail which diminishes his innate rationalism and morality, the strained dialogue between him and Elizabeth ‘I cannot speak for I am doubted, every moment judged for lies’ suggests Proctor’s shame of such doings. This evokes a sense of sympathy in the reader and thus Proctor’s moral empowerment. Proctor’s ultimate decision to be ‘hanged’ rather than give up his ‘integrity’ displays Proctor’s morality due to his refusal to use his power to exploit others. On the other hand, Reverend Parris draws upon irony as a religious authority due to his complete manipulation of power to gain more, the irony evident in ‘they will have me out of Salem for such corruption in my house’ evocatively conveys Parris’ valuing of superiority over integrity. Corruption of the Church is further noted through Parris’ valuing of material possessions ‘golden candlestick’, displaying how those with authority manipulate situations to fulfil self-serving desires.
Arthur Miller reports about John Proctor almost as a God among the citizens of Salem. Including the hierarchy such as Judge Danforth or Reverend Parris all respect him greatly. It is as if the people look at him as a leader and role model. The author shows way of losing power through the man who has the most in the beginning. Along with Abigail’s plan, of corrupting John’s life is discombobulated by Abigail accusing his wife of witchcraft.
I may falter somewhat, Mister; I am no fool” (69). Reverend Hale and John Proctor both recognize that the justice of the court is not “just” if an accusation is equal proof of guilt, and the only way you can avoid punishment is by confessing. However, Hale has a hard time believing that someone would confess to a crime they did not commit, as Proctor did. Thus, liberty and justice are not attainable when a corrupt court system
Reverend Parris, Deputy Governor Danforth, and Reverend Hale’s desire for Proctor’s confession demonstrates their need to keep up their reputations and the well-being of the citizens of Salem. A motive for Proctor’s confession is for Reverend Parris and Danforth’s reputations to be upheld and avoid a rebellion of the townspeople against the court and leaders. Parris fears that if Proctor is to be hanged, then the town will attempt to overthrow the court for it’s dishonesty and rebel against him. Danforth’s beliefs are similar to Parris’: if Proctor does not confess, then his reputation of holding up an honest and valid court would be ruined.
(Act IV). Elizabeth knows about Abigail's manipulation and jealousy drive. Elizabeth wants to still be with John. Elizabeth's forgiveness makes John proctor want to keep on living, even if he must be
John is a good man at heart though, and he strives to redeem himself by trying to correct his past wrongdoings. John proctor is a strong willed and flawed man who is