To be insane is to be irrational and disconnected from reality. In the novel, 1984, the modern view of being sane in Oceania's society is actually insane. The main character, Winston Smith, tackles a brainwashed society and a corrupt government who proclaims him as insane. Winston, however, is sane because he actually remembers the past, distinguishes the immorality of the Party and tries to ameliorate Oceania.
Winston is of sound mind proven by his ability to remember the past, while the authoritarians of Oceania believe anything the Party tells them. While Winston was recalling about Rutherford, Aaronson and Jone's confessing to being on Eurasian soil, the narrator reveals, "The date struck in Winston's memory because it chanced to be Midsummer Day; but the whole story must be on record in countless other places
…show more content…
The narrator mentions, "For whom, it suddenly occurred to him to wonder, was he writing this diary? For the future, for the unborn" (10). Winston is a genuinely righteous person. Trying to alleviate future generations and prevent the hardships of his time from happening again is a selfless, altruistic deed. Winston hypothesizes about a newspaper that proves Aaronson, Rutherford and Jones's innocence and yearns, "But it was evidence. It might have planted a few doubts here and there, supposing that I'd dared to show it to anybody. I don’t imagine that we can alter anything in our own lifetime. But one can imagine little knots of resistance springing up here and there- small groups of people banding themselves together, and gradually growing, and even leaving a few records behind, so that the next generation can carry on where we left off" (129). Winston has hope of a less horrible day that overthrows the Party, which shows his considerate, commiserating attitude and hunger for change and normality. How can one who aspires for a peaceful, civilized nation be
Yash Patel Mrs. Choi AP Literature October 2015 1984 Dialectal Journals for Part 2 Text Response 1. “In front of him was an enemy who was trying to kill him; in front of him, also was a human creature… He had indistinctively started forward to help her,” (Orwell 106) This quote shows that even in this time where they live in a life where they are being manipulated, Winston is still living in a time where he is experiencing hatred, but still maintains what keeps him normal or humane, which keeps him separated from everyone else. This hate is showing that people still have hate for each other and still want to kill each other but it also shows the true human he is by helping her when she was threatened.
In the novel, 1984 by George Orwell, Winston is both a anti-hero and a hero. A hero is a man who is appreciated or admired for strength, extraordinary accomplishments, or honorable qualities. A anti-hero is a focal character in a story, motion picture, or show who lacks regular heroic qualities. Winston shows both anti-hero and hero traits by showing the good and bad qualities about him in the novel. Winston was a brave man who supported his society.
First of all, we should ask ourselves the question ‘’What is insanity?’’. Most people would define it as a state of being or acting irrationally or senselessly. If this definition was to apply to the society we live in today and the present values, Winston most likely would be considered as a sane person. He has the ability to think critically and does not stick to only one version, despite living in a totalitarian regime. The book is full example, as one of the main themes throughout the book is Winston’s growing desire for some sort of rebellion.
Insanity vs. Sanity: Sometimes Being Ignorant is the Intelligent Choice In the book One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest, Ken Kesey utilizes literary devices, irony, tone and conflict to achieve the theme of the difference between being sane but ignorant and being insane but intelligent. The tone, irony, and setting of this book helps the reader create a mental image of the real location and the situations the characters were at times. Symbolism is added as well in order to further understand the way the characters think.
It never existed[... He does] not remember it” (247). This way of doublethink causes Winston to be forced to accept the party’s power because he is being gaslit and is now a victim of this manipulation. This, in turn, causes him to question his own belief. In addition, even if Winston wanted to defend his belief, he has no evidence that could prove it- it had all been altered
It stands to reason that in 1984, George Orwell employs both the glass paperweight and Winston’s diary to develop Winston’s desire for the past and his personal rebellion against the Party. The glass paperweight, as a remnant of the past, reflects Winston’s attempt to reconnect with the past and his hope to rebel the government. When Winston first sees the paperweight in Mr.Charrington’s shop, he is fascinated because “The thing was doubly attractive because of its apparent uselessness, though he could guess that it must once have been intended as paperweight”(Orwell 95). According to the Party, there is no such thing as beautiful as the paperweight in the current society, which is because the beauty and uselessness of the paperweight go against
This is one of his first acts of rebellion against the party, by not believing in them and doubting what it’s told to him. Winston also struggles with the new war. The party announced they are at war with Eastasia and not Eurasia, and they made sure the records say that the party was always at war with Eastasia and they are allies with Eurasia. “Oceania was at war with Eastasia: Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia… The work was overwhelming, all the more so because the processes that it involved could not be called by their true names.
Winston was never a devoted follower, constantly questioning the world around him. Even when in custody, Winston continued questioning motives and denouncing the Party and Big Brother, despite the futility. He knew no societal changes would result from his actions, but desperately wanted to share his ideas with someone, and since he was already being tortured, he was capable of speaking freely in the jail area. The purpose was to rid him of his rebellious mindset, and to do so, O’Brien needed to know everything Winston honestly thought in order to ‘correct’ it fully. For example, O’Brien forced Winston to recognize that whatever the Party said was true by holding up four fingers and saying there were five, “But there had been a moment- of luminous certainty, where each new suggestion of O’Brien’s had filled up a patch of emptiness and had become absolute truth, and when two and two could have been three as easily five, if that were what was needed (Orwell 258).
He was getting tired of the telescreen, people getting vaporized, and the Thought Police. Winston sought the truth and wondered how time was back in the old days, was it better or worse? Winston had always had rebellious thoughts against the Party for listening to people’s
Award winning writer, George Orwell, in his dystopian novel, 1984, Winston and O’Brien debate the nature of reality. Winston and O’Brien’s purpose is to persuade each other to believe their own beliefs of truth and reality. They adopt an aggressive tone in order to convey their beliefs about what is real is true. In George Orwell’s 1984, Winston and O’Brien use a variety of different rhetorical strategies and appeals such as parallel structure, pathos, and logos in order to persuade each other about the validity of memories and doublethink; however, each character’s argument contains flaw in logic. Winston debates with O’Brien that truth and reality are individual and connected to our memories.
The aforementioned quotes illustrate the extent of Winston’s desire for change and revolution, which can be inferred by the structure, language, and context present in the quotes. For example, the leading quote displays Winston’s desperation for change, as seen by the use of “hope” and the simple sentence structure of the statement. The use of “hope” shows that Winston’s desires hinge upon the proles, thereby illustrating the extent of his nonconformity; he is willing to place the burden of his own humanity upon the undereducated masses of society, because they are not restricted by the party’s orthodoxy, as opposed to viewing them as mindless cattle. Similarly, the simple sentence structure of the leading quote displays the certainty of
The past holds the key to the future, but when the past is constantly being rewritten, it is impossible to learn from previous mistakes. When Winston is first writing his diary he asks himself who it is meant for and writes “To the future or to the past, to a time when thought is free, when men are different from one another and do not live alone--to a time when truth exists and what is done cannot be undone: From the age of uniformity, from the age of solitude, from the age of Big Brother, from the age of doublethink” (Orwell 28). Winston envisions a time where there is real freedom and the past remains the past and is unchanged. By looking to the past, when things were different and in Winston’s mind, better, readers see hope for the future.
In the entry, Winston tries explain as to how the party and Big brother use different forms of media to spread their propaganda, which will lead them to ultimate power. He also makes an attempt to instigate mutual feelings in Winston smith of the future. The overall tone in the diary entry is more or less plane sailing. In most part of the entry it is very dour with some parts giving a feeling of fear to the
Yet this is the year Winston writes in his diary, the keeping of which is an extremely
Insanity is a mental illness, or disease, that steals the victim’s ability to tell existent from fantasy. Insane does not mean the person performed something odd or crazy. In law, it does not matter if the convict is deranged at the time of trial, but if the convict was insane at the time of the crime. Whenever I say my client is insane, I conclude that they couldn’t tell what they were doing. An example of this is someone running another person over with a car because they can't see said person, or thinking they are being followed by another car.