1) Present a PICO question (it does not need to be your final PICO question): "Do hospitalized patients who are treated in Magnet-status hospitals have improved patient outcomes as compared to those patients being treated in non-Magnet status hospitals?" 2) Conduct a literature search using your search strategy and guidance from this week 's search tutorials: When conducting the initial literature research the principal databases utilized were PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database. After reading the "How to search evidence " Power Point, OVID and TRIP was added to the search. 3) Present whether you have to revise your search strategies or not with the reasons: Based upon the knowledge obtained from Research Methodology N5013 and the …show more content…
Keeping an open mind and being transparent when doing a literature search is key in producing a comprehensive and meaningful literature review. Discussion 5: 1) Read “How to search evidence” PowerPoint, and 2) discuss at least 5 things what you learned about searching evidence. Five points learned from the Power Point include: 1. Using professional databases such as PubMEd, CINAHL, Cochrane, EBSCO, etc. is essential in finding reliable, current and valid data. 2. Keeping track of the information found is also important so the you can go back at a later date to retrieve and review; it also assists in avoiding duplication of articles. Keeping good records allows the researcher to be more efficient. 3. If during the search of literature, the articles you find are enormous then you can limit some things such as age, gender, language, and publication years. 4. It was recommended to use the same key words, inclusion and exclusion criteria when searching throughout all databases 5. Based upon the topic of interest will determine which professional databases to utilize. Some database 's content is primarily healthcare issues, psych, and social issues; therefore, it is wise to become familiar with aspects common in most databases in order to yield accurate
The details of the study included literature review, purpose, method, data analysis, results, discussion, limitations, nursing implications, recommendations for future research and conclusion. The results were clearly presented. Study limitations were identified. The conclusion was based on study results. This review was of good quality.
BSBMKG402B Analyze consumer behavior for specific markets Assessment Task 2: Project – Consumer behavior analysis A summary of domestic consumer participation in Aboriginal tourism experiences. You should include: Key information about the demographics of domestic consumers participating in Aboriginal tourism experiences, as well as their general attitudes towards participating in Aboriginal tourism experiences. Age: between 10-60 Place of birth:
The primary search engine that the student researcher utilized was from Google Scholar. The student researcher has found over seventy articles that were
To better understand the data found, I have organized the literature review into
Jennings, N., Clifford, S., Fox, A. R., O'Connell, J., & Gardner, G. (2015). The impact of nurse practitioner services on cost, quality of care, satisfaction and waiting times in the emergency department: A systematic review. International Journal Of Nursing Studies, 52(1), 421-435. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.07.006
For this week’s discussion post I will identify a situation where evidence-based practice has been applied in my workplace. Evidence-based guidelines are put in place and into practice after research has been completed. This helps with intertwining practice and research and are established by professional organizations, government agencies, institutions, or expert panels (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2014). These clinical guidelines give clinicians findings to help in the decision making process of diseases or treatments. In developing evidence-based practice, a clinical question must first be put into place.
Developing a question that is answerable with research is the critical step in solving a primary problem (Davies, 2011, p. 77). The PICO is a mnemonic that helps address research questions: P – Patient or Population: Who is the patient? What are the most important characteristics of the patient? What is the primary problem, disease, or condition?
The model outlines specific steps to a practice question, evaluating, and developing recommendations and implementing practice change. It also has a rating scale to determining the value of evidence for research and non-research data. Unlike ACE, it includes both clinician and patient expertise. The critical appraisal component guides the teaching process of evidence review to students. While it is adaptable to clinical settings, is has little emphasis in the organization cultural
PICOT question- In an adult inpatient psychiatric unit with patients with one or more active DSM-V diagnoses (P), how does staff engagement following TIC and the tidal model guidelines (I) compared to our current standard of care of maintaining therapeutic milieu and de-escalation as needed (C) affect incidences seclusion, restraints and harm of other patients and staff (O) over 12 month period (T)? A systematic review is usually conducted by experts to answer a clear clinical question by reviewing studies (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015).
Magnet status yields a long list of benefits related to improved quality of care and nurse job satisfaction. Most of these benefits have a direct relationship to lower costs. Earlier studies have found Magnet hospitals to have shorter lengths of stay and improved patient outcomes and that the culture of safety that is inherent in Magnet hospitals significantly contributed to patient safety. Other studies have shown a compelling association between Magnet status and significantly improved mortality rates 30 days from admission. Many of these benefits translate to lower operational costs for Magnet hospitals.
Are the findings reliable?? How likely is it that the findings would be same if repeated? Objectivity:? Can the findings be objectively confirmed/verified?
Many times researchers doing reviews end up with a chronological catalog of all of the relevant sources reviewed instead of an evaluation that integrates previous research together explaining how it integrates into the proposed research program (Wang et al., 2015). Poor literature review fails to capture all sides of an argument and tends to be bias, avoiding to critically mention areas of agreement and disagreement (Shipman, 2014). Such a review is merely a collection of quotes and paraphrasing from other sources (Willig, 2013). Sadly enough most researchers undertaking psychological research are not skilled in doing a quality
According to University College London (UCL) (2011), critical evaluation helps to filter necessary information, identify studies that are applicable clinically and also for continuous professional development (CPD). However, evaluation of an article, is assessed using pre-designed instrument that encourages a more thorough and systematic method; it is designed for different study design and ask specific questions as pertain validity of the study such as: if the study has given an answer to the research question and has met its set aims and objectives, the methodology, analysis and interpretation of findings (Harder, 2014; Burls, 2009; Whiffin and Hasselder, 2013). It could be said that a good critical assessment plays a vital in evidence-based practice. Therefore, a critical appraisal skills programme (CASP, 2009) checklist will be used to evaluate the selected paper for this
Understanding Pica Eating disorders are serious, life-threating mental illnesses that are on the rise in society today. Obsession with one’s physical appearance, emotionally problems, or sole desire to eat can contribute to an eating disorder. There are serious consequences that come with the disorders that can be very harmful to an individual with an eating disorder, and often even fatal. Most commonly talked about eating disorders include, bulimia nervosa, anorexia nervosa, and binge eating. Pica is another disorder that is on the rise today with very little comprehension on exactly what is it, who it targets, or how it is treated.
Chapter two; Literature Review The entire research journey is based on few important steps which can also be recognized as research process involving certain measures; to be carried out effectively. This process includes (Library, 2015); 1. Framing of a particular research question 2. searching and examining the relevant literature studies 3. Management of the accumulated search data 4.