The Netflix series House Of Cards is based off of Majority House Whip Francis Underwood as the show brings you on a long journey, as Frank demands his retribution to the people that lied to him. The scheming and malicious, Frank Underwood along with his equally manipulative wife, Claire attack Washington by climbing the chain of command within the White House. The main character Frank Underwood uses his authority to take advantage of the concerns of the public to achieve both self glory in hopes of obtaining great power. The question I present to you is, “Is Frank Underwood actually just a tyrant that leads to democratic complications and the evils that come along with it?” Drawing on Plato’s Republic, I will argue that Frank Underwood is a …show more content…
“Such a waste of talent. He chose money over power. In this town, a mistake nearly everyone makes. Money is the Mc-mansion in Sarasota that starts falling apart after 10 years. Power is the old stone building that stands for centuries. I cannot respect someone who doesn’t see the difference”, was Frank’s quote on Remy a political businessman in the show(INSERT CITATION). This quote not only represented the idea of power for Frank but it created a comparison between him and Thrasymachus of the Plato’s Republic. In Plato’s Republic, Thrasymachus gives his definition of justice as, “Justice is nothing but the advantageous to the stronger”(Reeve 2004). Thrasymachus and Frank agree that in a way justice and power are more important that money and provide a leader with the opportunity to make and create laws with his self interest in mind. Thrasymachus view on justice was quite a tyrannical view in the book Plato’s Republic. As we transition through the book we learn that Democracy is transformed in a tyranny in multiple ways but it starts off as a Democracy. At the start of the show, Frank presents himself to his constituents and the public as a good role model, and makes …show more content…
Throughout the show, Frank will exploit individuals that are driven by their unnecessary desires. For example, Peter Russo a congressman in the show is caught with a call girl and drugs, and Frank uses this opportunity to help Peter and in return, he wants his absolute loyalty. Which Frank, later on, demanded Peter close the shipyard playing into his scheme that will increase his power. This connects with the topic in the book on how a tyrant enslaves a democratic soul and uses it to its own advantage. You can see how this might lead to quite the rebellion, as in the case of the call girl that is still on the loose that could expose Frank as a monster. This example of rebellion from the show aligns with the drones and how they stir up the public and how they will try and revolt on the tyrant once they realize that they have not been doing their job and just focusing on themselves. Now the tyrant is faced with a revolt and he must deal with the situation and as a result, he kills all the virtuous people for fear that they will unseat him, then enslaves everyone else so that he can steal from them to support his lavish and extravagant lifestyle. This description of the tyrant from the book matches Frank’s response perfectly. The enslaved soul of Doug Stamper, who is
Hank wants to create a democracy in Camelot. But of course ‘‘ I was from Connecticut, whose Constitution declares ‘‘that all political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their benefit; and that they have at all times an undeniable and indefeasible right to alter their form of government in such a manner as they may think expedient’’(page:78 ). Hank invited some freemans to breakfast and was chatting about democracy. These people have no idea of a different type of ruling. Their is not always a king and everybody around him worships the king.
At first, Reich evokes a feeling of hopelessness and disappointment in the reader by explaining how there is no longer democracy in the US. This can be seen when Reich states that, "political parties stopped representing the views of most constituents," (Reich, 2) and that, "we entered a vicious cycle in which political power became more concentrated in monied interests that used the power to their advantage," (Reich, 2). By including this, Reich is showing the reader the true severity of the situation in which the people no longer have a say in public policy because money and power has become the main focus. However, as the blog continues, Reich begins to generate a more positive emotion in the reader. Reich states that "the only way back towards democracy...for the majority is for us to get politically active once again...," (Reich, 3) and that "the rest of us need to do what we can do best -- use out voices, our vigor, and our votes."
If your civil rights were taken away, would you fight to protect your rights or watch and let your civil rights drift away? Marcus, a main character in the book Little Brother, was near the bay bridge in San Francisco when it was blown up by terrorists. He was blamed for it by the DHS (Department of Homeland Security). Due to the bombing, the city was put under heavy watch by the DHS and everyone was treated as a potential terrorist, especially Marcus. Throughout the book, Marcus fought against the DHS for the rights to privacy of himself and the civilians of San Francisco.
All over the world, individuals would want to alter something in their past for a more enriched life. One’s precedent actions will inevitably bear an impact on future resolutions. In Upton Sinclair’s novel, The Jungle, the main character, Jurgis Rudkus, departed Lithuania, with his beloved and her family, for a more prosperous life in America, but after countless of trials, ended up destitute. His decisions throughout the tribulations will determine the outcome in a world full of adversity. However, how Jurgis acted on one of his ordeals engendered a great burden that he still bears in the present, and that this link into the past depicts Sinclair’s theme of corruption.
The House of the Scorpion is a science fiction novel written by Nanny Farmer and is meant to be for young adults. This book tells the story of Matt, a young clone owned by a powerful drug lord El Patron. Matt later finds out the truth about where he comes from and faces challenges to try to find his place in society. This book has many adult subjects like abuse and drugs in this book, yet some would criticize that it is a bit much for children to read about. though Farmer's intent for this is to make kids aware of different types of dangers.
Audience: The audience that Gregory of Tours is trying to reach is anyone who will listen to his story of the Frank family. It could be any of the general public in the town or outsiders. Similarly, he is trying to reach generations to come; therefore, they know the good and the bad of the kings before them. Purpose:
Similar scenes in the novel help illustrate Frank’s sensitivity towards his
In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel The Scarlet Letter a peculiar character whose real name is never revealed, poisons a man with a vicious bite. The reader may know him as Roger Chillingworth, the husband of Hester Prynne and self proclaimed physician, but a closer look at his appearance and actions will show how he fueled the fire of Hell. How Roger Chillingworth was the Devil. Everything about Chillingworth was told through his appearance throughout the story as he became the embodiment of Hell’s tyrant.
In consideration of he did not have a degree to get a high paying job. Instead Frank made up resumes that were so high notched that the professors couldn't help but say your “highered”! Thus, Frank Jr. used his manipulative skills to lie to most of the community just to follow up with his master
There are many different kinds of kids that are lonely everywhere you go and have feelings of anger, like those that are displayed in Stephen King’s “Carrie.” This book is based on real life issues about people getting hurt due to frustrated people when their anger gets the best of them. Carrie is one of these frustrated kids that lives lonely with no moral love from anyone and this makes her angry and upset. Carrie is a unique character that brings many types of conflicts into people's lives. She is a young teenager that is blind to the real world and everything that revolves around a normal teenager’s life and events that happen.
Although Frank is just a child, his tone throughout the story is made so it shows that he recognizes the seriousness,” Mam visits me on Thursdays. I’d like to see my father, too, but I’m out of danger, crisis, time is over, and I’m allowed only one visitor.” (pg.344) He’s in uncomfortable situations with
In The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger Holden Caulfield’s story is seemingly aimless and without any sense of direction. However, Salinger brings the novel into focus in the final chapters by introducing the idea of being the “Catcher in the Rye” from the poem by Robert Burns. Holden confesses to Phoebe his desire to be a “Catcher,” but the definition of this role is only given in a short exposition. A “Catcher in the Rye” can be defined unofficially as a person that is a savior of others and exhibits the qualities of control and bravery. The Catcher is meant to save people from going over the fictitious cliff that Holden imagines.
fortunate”(292). Although he is white, Atticus demonstrates how one can understand someone, regardless of color. Instead of just being Tom Robinson’s lawyer, Atticus chooses to defend this man;however, since it is made known that Atticus is doing so, the town of Maycomb reacts with negativity. For example, he is insulted numerous times by the people of Maycomb.” Your father’s no better than the n****** and trash he works for”(Lee 135).
Ambition, Power, and Corruption The play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, has many themes. The themes, or life lessons, that most relate to the world today are ambition, power, and corruption. These motifs relate to politics and politicians today.
Abraham Lincoln once stated, “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.” One important term in Lincoln’s statement is adversity, which means a case or situation of major or extended hardship or misfortune. Another significant term in Lincoln’s statement is character, which means the fundamental complex of attributes that determine a person's moral and ethical actions and reactions. Taken entirely, Abraham Lincoln suggests in his statement that having power is not always a good thing. Furthermore, Abraham Lincoln implies in his statement that power can make a kind and good person strong so that they can stand up for those who can not stand up for themselves but it can also make a dishonest person corrupt and greedy.