Long before (and after) Americans advocated for the importance of freedom, they were dependent on the labor of freedomless individuals (41). The southern states were notorious for holding the majority of slaves, while the North had become generally slave-free by the time Frederick Douglass gave the speech we will be analyzing on July 4th, 1852. This disparity between the two regions made it possible for enslaved individuals to flee to the North in hopes of becoming a free man. Fredrick Douglass was one of those lucky individuals. He broke free from the shackles of slavery upon arriving in the North after leaving Maryland. This perspective made his preachings for the immediate end of slavery impactful, and allowed him to become an essential …show more content…
In his speech, he denounced the “hypocrisy” of celebrating a day of freedom while many enslaved individuals still exist in the United States (353). As he describes the horrors he’s witnessed in the trafficking of fellow slaves, he uses emotional language that pulls at the audience’s heart-strings. His diction consisted of strong words such as “piteous,” “doleful,” and “flesh-mongers,” all of which have strong negative connotations (354). This was a reflection of the popular Romanticism movement at the time which shifted the focus to feelings rather than thoughts. By focusing on the apparent negatives of slavery in such an emotional way, he’s putting the audience in his shoes and letting them be spectators. As someone who has witnessed the atrocities of slavery, Douglass is able to paint a picture for his audience consisting of northerners who had most likely never even been to the South. For these people who don’t own slaves themselves, he serves as a window into this world of slavery in southern states. This is further shown by Douglass repeatedly using phrases such as “I see” and “I hear” (354). These clauses demonstrate the spectatorship of the audience’s perspective, since the majority of the movement consisted of Northerners. Without the emphasis on Douglass’ own experience throughout the speech, it would be increasingly difficult to know that he was a witness to slavery and his audience was not. This highlights the contrast between the majority of people fighting for this movement, and those they are fighting for. Many of the supporters had never seen slavery themselves, but former inhabitants of the South such as Douglass and the Grimke Sisters allowed them to ‘spectate' what was happening in that region of the country. This credibility combined with Douglass’ impactful diction allows the audience to see how awful
Rhetorical Analysis for ‘The Narrative of the life of Fredrick Douglass’ Fredrick Douglass’s influential experiences recorded in ‘The Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglass’, reveals his woeful hardships as a slave, which he overcomes with his unfaltering desire to become an educated and ultimately free man. He apprises readers of the monstrous realities of slavery whilst providing a silver lining of hope to light the path to freedom. Throughout the entirety of the book, FD’s riveting diction accentuates his forthright opinions and detestation toward the vicious, pitiless, and blood-thirsty slaveholders with words such as “wicked”, “horrid” and “cowardly”. To slaveholders, education was a threat; to FD it was a sanctuary.
From this quote, readers can clearly analyze that even when Douglass escaped to freedom in the North, he cannot rest easy, nor stay placid. Douglass anticipates that he might be taken back to the South, and reclaim his identity as a slave; and he is aware that anyone around him is
In the urgent yet angry speech given by Frederick Douglass on July 4th, 1852 in Rochester, New York, Douglass expounds upon the comparison between slaves and free humans. The intended audience of this speech, consisting mostly of free white men, allowed for Douglass to express and spread his abolitionist ideas. Douglass draws numerous comparisons between life as a slave and life as a free man, while using rhetorical devices to convey his message of equality for all. Through the use of metaphors to describe the unimaginable daily life in slavery, Douglass expounds upon his call for equality; on a day supposed to represent freedom for all, not just the few elite whites. The comparison between “bleeding children of sorrow this day” connect and
In his autobiography Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, Douglass uses numerous devices and an unvarnished tone to soften a notoriously divisive subject and reveal the cruelty of slavery to a mostly white audience. Throughout the piece, Douglass employs numerous devices such as irony and aphorisms to camouflage the stark realities of slavery; such as when he says “a still tongue makes a wise head”(p.23) or Douglass’ ironic description of Mr. Gore as a “good overseer.” His wields this language to hide the realities that would alienate or turn off the white reader from his writing. Douglass also uses unembellished language to allow him to speak of some of the harshest parts of being a slave, and leave the moral deliberation up to the
It makes the audience consider their own deeds and participation in the enduring of the slavery institution. Secondly Douglass challenges the audience's understanding of liberty by posing rhetorical queries. He asks, "To drag a man in fetters into the grand illuminated temple of liberty and call upon him to join you in joyous anthems, were inhuman mockery and sacrilegious irony. Do you mean, citizens, to mock me, by asking me to speak today?" These inquiries highlight the contradiction of praising freedom while restricting it to others.
The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass is an autobiography written in 1845 on his account of the experiences as an African American slave and the prejudices experienced to demonstrate social influence for the abolitionist movement. His story accounts his involvement as a child on a plantation, and then his experiences moving into the city until attaining freedom within the North. These experiences were often used as social rhetoric by Douglass to appeal towards a southern society who are inherently prejudice and to gain movement for abolitionism, which was at its basis of infrastructure. As such, this essay analyzes the rhetoric through a specific passage on its word modulation which allows for structural composition open to various
Douglass establishes his credibility and authority on the issue of slavery and inequality in the United States by drawing on his own experience and expertise. He begins the speech by introducing himself as a former slave and expressing his sadness and disappointment at the Fourth of July festivities which celebrate the nation’s independence while ignoring the ongoing oppression of African Americans. He says, “I am not included within the pale of this glorious anniversary! Your high independence only reveals the immeasurable distance between us.” By acknowledging his own identity as a former slave, Douglass gives himself immediate credibility on the issue of slavery and inequality.
“With them, justice, liberty and humanity were “final”; not slavery and oppression.” This relates to the hardships and the fact that the people don’t recognize how terrible it is. And that these meanings of these “free” words mean something else to him and other slaves. He shows that the changes are hard but once they are made everything will be peaceful. Rhetorical features and strategies are Douglass’ forte’ in engaging with the audience.
He points out personal facts about how he feels when he says, “I often found myself regretting my own existence, and wishing myself dead; and but for the hope of being free, I have no doubt but that I should have killed myself or done something foe which I should have been killed”. The words that he uses explains the emotions that he was going through and to build an appeal to emotions. Throughout the time that he has been expanding his knowledge he runs across the word “abolitionist” which means it’s a movement to end slavery. He was always eager for someone to speak about it and he was ready to listen he says, “I did not dare ask anyone about its meaning, for I was satisfied that it was something they wanted me to know very little about”. He says this because he realized that the word is spoken very rarely and he knew if he spoke that word and someone heard him, he could get penalized.
‘’ No words, No tears, No prayers, from his glory victim, seemed to move his iron heart fro his bloody purpose.’’ (page 5). Douglass appeals to the mournful emotions of the audience by expressing how the overseers gave no mercy or cared about the effect of whippings to the slaves. Douglass use of parallelism displayed how slavery was
On July 5th 1852 Fredrick Douglass gave a speech to the anti-slavery society to show that all men and woman are equal no matter what. Douglass uses ethos, pathos, and logos in his speech to make look reasonable. Douglass demonstrates ethos by speaking in first person that of which he had experience slavery: "I was born amid such sights and scenes"(Douglass 4). When Douglass spoke these words to the society, they knew of his personal knowledge and was able to depend on him has a reliable source of information. The anti-slavery society listening to his every word, considering that Douglass spoke with integrity, knowledge and emotions.
he uses bold words and biting criticism to call attention to the gross injustices and hypocrisy of slavery in the United States. In the opening remarks of his speech, Douglas provides heart-wrenching descriptions to pull his audience into the lives of their fellow
He truly tapped into the reader’s emotions to allow them a deeper connection with the story. To see the way that the slaveholder would dehumanize the slave to the point of seeing the slave as just a piece of property was truly heartbreaking. It was at moments such as this that the reader saw a glimpse of the mood, tone and theme. Douglass makes clear his tone of understanding, the theme of both the slave and the slaveholder being affected, and the mood of the reader being
He questions his audience of the significance of Independence Day to slaves, and he answers it in an extremely contrasting way: “your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; … your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery,” that the celebration is “a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages.” Douglass dismisses the national pride, characterizing it as a mere expression of people’s ignorance. The antithesis, with “greatness” being “vanity,” “sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless,” and “shouts of liberty and equality” being “hollow mockery,” provokes shock and anger from the audience, who have just been part of it and are now degraded as “savages.” However, Douglass was not trying to be inflammatory but provocative, witnessing the pathetic enthusiasm in the anniversary, that people feel exuberant about themselves while ignoring the saddening
Douglass points to the vast unwillingness from the group of whites that refuses to fully perceive and accept African-Americans as deserving and equal citizens of the nation. Based on his personal experiences as a slave, Douglass is abundantly aware that the battle to abolish slavery is not an easy task. For the first twenty years of his life, he witnessed firsthand the abject cruelty of that institution in our country. Tactfully, Douglass seizes this opportunity to publicly highlight the unmerited and coarse differences in the treatment between the whites as opposed to the blacks living in the United States during this time period. He makes a “powerful testaments to the hypocrisy, bigotry and inhumanity of slavery” (Bunch 1).