The short memoir of “Shooting the Elephant” tells the story of George Orwell’s experience as a british policeman in imperialized Burma. His experience is made up of anger, hate and resentment of conditions he feels is out of his control. Orwell makes many revelations in this story, one of them being, “when the white man turns tyrant, it is his own freedom that he destroys.” Orwell also claims, “He wears a mask; and his face grows to fit it.” These statements possess much validity and can be supported in multiple ways. I affirm these statements because as a ruler or leader, they forfeit their own feelings when are responsible for the people, he is overlooking and must do anything in his power for the greatest good, sometimes sacrificing his own needs. He also “grows into a mask” because as a ruler, he is most obligated to put on a facade for the sake of the people and again for the greater good. …show more content…
In Machiavelli’s “The Morals of the Prince” the idea of a ruler’s/ tyrant’s obligation to his people is also presented. In one section, Machiavelli talks a ruler’s best way to navigate himself through leadership. Machiavelli weighs between the importance of being generous and self-preservative. A ruler risks his entire welfare for the sake of being seen as benevolent. He states, “A prince of character is bound to use up his entire revenue in works of ostentation...he will have to load his people with exorbitant taxes and squeeze money out of them...for when he is poor nobody will respect him.” In this example, Machiavelli makes it clear that a ruler’s actions are always tied to the people’s welfare. A ruler cannot act carelessly when he is no longer subject to his own opinions, but the people he watches over. This idea supports Orwell’s statement because with a ruler’s gained liability, he loses a sense of his own freedom, ironic as it may
Machiavelli argues the perfect prince will be both feared and loved by his people, and if unable to be both he will make himself feared and not hated. Machiavelli believes it is much safer to be feared than to be loved because people are less likely to offend and stand up against strong characters, also people are less concerned in offending a prince who has made himself loved. Accordingly, Machiavelli believes generosity is harmful to your reputation and the choice between being generous or stingy, merciful or cruel, honest or deceitful, should only be important if it aids the prince in political power. All in all, Machiavelli believes the ruler must be a great deceiver and do what is essential to uphold power over the
Machiavelli’s The Prince presents a guide of certain qualities of the ideal political leaders such as, kindness towards the citizens, advocates preservation of one 's custom or policy, and having excellent control over territory they acquired. Firstly, Machiavelli presents a point that citizens will not tolerate the ill-treatment from the Prince after he deceived them the first time. “Because those who had opened the gates to him, finding themselves deceived in their hopes of future benefits, would not endure the ill-treatment of the new Prince.
A leader’s cruelty enables him to make the decisions necessary for the kingdom, while also being miserly to keep the people happy. I think that Machiavelli’s advice provides a sound basis on how leaders today can lead. On other hand, others may argue that Machiavelli’s advice leads rulers astray and rather rulers should be kind and generous because morally that is the right thing to do. No matter the interpretation of how a ruler should lead, Machiavelli's analyst of a leaders provides insight into everyday life and causes leaders today to think about how they
Well known author and journalist, George Orwell, in his essay, Shooting an Elephant, describes his experiences as a Policeman in Moulmein, Burma during European Imperialism. Orwell’s purpose is to convey the ideal that what is right and what is accepted don’t always align. He adopts a remorseful tone in order to convey to the reader the weight of his actions. By looking at George Orwell’s use of imagery and figurative language, one can see his strongly conflicting opinions on Imperialism. Orwell begins his essay, Shooting an Elephant, by explaining the actions of the Burmese people and by expressing his contempt for imperialism.
Orwell begins his piece of writing with an extremely weak character that has been mocked and laughed at by the people of Burma. Orwell depicts his job situation in which he was “stuck”
Both of these highly influential authors had different opinions on ruling that would shape how people would rule during their time and for rulers to come. One of Machiavelli’s major points in The Prince was that it was better to be feared than to be loved. He said this was because while both ways can be useful tools to help one rule, men are less likely to turn a ruler if they were afraid of punishment. Machiavelli had little faith in the common man and had this to say about them, “They are ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving, avoiders of dangers, eager to gain”(pg.353).
Throughout “Shooting An Elephant” , Orwell’s narrative style brings out internal and external conflicts that are relatable in society today. The narrator faces multiple internal and external conflicts. One external conflict being the Burmese and how they mock him because he is a representative of the British Empire, but he will do what it takes to show them he is not a fool. "I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool.
Their arguments center on the need for longevity and eternity. Machiavelli does so by suggesting tactics as to when the ruler should be generous and when he should not. For example, he says that Caesar, Cyrus and Alexander were only generous when it came to giving away the belongings of those they had plundered and that this made them successful rulers. Therefore Machiavelli argues that the purpose of generosity or being miserly at the opportune moment increases the length of the reign. Throughout the book, his main aim is to provide the ruler with tactics and tricks to amass and consolidate power and increase the time for which he rules a country.
Something a great and powerful leader is supposed to be able to do is make decision, even when people don’t agree with them. Machiavelli believed that a ruler should be concerned only with power and success, also “The Prince,” by Machiavelli understands the importance of decision making and the respect for sticking to your decisions. I am very conflicted with this because I believe a ruler should do what’s right for his people, to protect their people, but also be a little ruthless at times. Not ruthless,I think we should be able to 100% trust our leader to do what’s right. A ruthless, heartless, unmerciful, leader who only cares about himself is the last thing you want.
During the early nineteen hundred, George Orwell published his short story ‘Shooting an Elephant’. In the beginning of this story Orwell states his anger and hatred towards the British Imperialism, even though he is a British police officer. He also states his hatred toward the “evil-spirited little beasts,” the Burmese people. As the story goes on, Orwell uses an impeccable way of writing. Swiftly switching the tone between narration and his personal experience and opinions into the story.
In his essay, “Shooting an Elephant” George Orwell describes his experience of killing an elephants when he was an officer in Burma. He explains how the local Burmese hated him and saw him as the authority of the repressive white British. He mentions that he also had the same feeling about the local Burmese. Even though he hated the Thyestean imperialism but he also hated what he called the yellow-faced and evil-spirted Burmese people. One day, he was told that an elephant was destroying the bazaar and killing people.
In Orwell’s essays Shooting an Elephant and Politics and the English Language, he uses two different modes of writing to convey similar emotions. In both essays, Orwell’s emotions can be described as defiant towards the current state of the world as a socialist. In Shooting an Elephant before the incident involving the elephant, Orwell already gives his stance on British imperialism by showing the emotional discourse between him and the Burmese locals. He then uses the elephant as a metaphor for a peaceful group of people, like the Burmese, while he uses himself and the Burmese villagers as a metaphor for the British. The act of him killing the elephant as a result of the pressure from the villagers is akin to the British colonizing Burma and taking away their lives and freedom.
In George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant”, he encounters the pressure influenced by the Burmese and the way it affected his decision. Orwell uses symbols such as the police officer, the yellow faces, and the elephant to represent the evil of English imperialism. The Police officer symbolizes his weakness of authority, the executioner of the elephant, and guilt. Orwell explains “I was hated by large numbers of people.”
In the article entitled, “The Prince”, Niccolo Machiavelli ensures that political realism is the safest way to maintain the rule. According to Machiavelli, he discusses that in order for a ruler to preserve the rule he should be clever enough. Furthermore, Machiavelli mentions the good traits of every ruler. However, Machiavelli adds that the good traits would result in the loss of rule for the ruler. Moreover, Machiavelli indicates that some ethics result in negative results and some immorals result in positive consequences.
For centuries, Imperialism has affected many societies around the world. In the sixteenth century, the British Empire colonized places such as Burma, India. In George Orwell’s essay, “Shooting an Elephant”, he gives a first person account of imperialism. His retrospective story entails a moral dilemma he faced as a British police officer in Burma. Orwell uses the themes of imperial representation resentment to demonstrate the true nature of imperial colonialism and its effects on both the victims and prosecutors.