Since the begining of America, the Founding Fathers wrote the strong-standing Bill of Rights with amendments to protect the country that had just recently won their freedom, but one amendment has been the top theme of controversies for centuries. Gun laws offend the Bill of Rights in so many ways and they prove ineffective. Gun Laws are relevant due to thousands of deaths and self-protection. The argument goes on but without guns there is militia, one of the main intents of the Second Amendment. These simple rules can reduce deaths, proven by millions of influential people. Gun laws have their positives and negatives, but the debate isn 't resolved yet. Although making people give weapons up is an agreeable idea to many citizens, an American …show more content…
The thought of a society without a militia is sickening with terrorists being able to attack any helpless citizen. Sure, the alternative weapons are useful, yet they don 't have any range upon the enemy and some people can not acquire the physical force or tactical skill needed to fortify. Gun control makes it so only the fittest of the fittest survive, which means even more deaths when terrorists attack. To add, gun laws do not prove any use. Even though gun laws prevent deaths, they infringe so many rights in the immutable Bill of Rights, which is one of the foundations of the great United States. Gun laws give too much power to the government and way less from the people, which will lead to government corruption. And, stated by ClearPictureOnline.com,”Guns don 't kill people, people do. We need to concentrate on the values and morals of our citizens and at the role the media plays in glorifying violence and the lack of respect for law.” (Shootout: Do We Need More Gun Control Regulations?) What people don 't understand is that they are taking away their own freedoms with Gun Control. In conclusion, the people for Gun Control are infringing rules that are immovable, and the against it are literally on higher ground because they know that the people for it are trying to fight America, which they are. Gun Control is just one big fight that was started by people that lust for control and use it to pollute the society. Even though gun laws are the top answer for less gun
The directions gun control may take not only affect our nation and society but the future. Guns play a role in everyone’s lives to some degree, whether it be your own personal possession for hunting or home protection. Many consider a militia to be "necessary to the security of a free state" ("The Constitution of the United States," Amendment 2). Americans value the rights that freedom granted by the forefathers, which includes the
According to the Unites States Constitution, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”. Gun control is a hotly debated issue that has been roaring for over half a century. The first major gun control act was the 1934 National Firearms Act. This attempt was to control the growing amount of mafia related crimes of the 30 's. Ever since then both federal and state governments have been cracking down on guns through gun control. Gun control is a failure because it does not work, firearms are not the problem and guns stop crime.
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun. Guns not only provide protection & security, they are used for hunting as well. Hunting has been used to feed families for centuries, and can be the difference between going to bed hungry and having a meal for a struggling family. Gun control enthusiasts believe that guns kill people, and that by banning guns there will be far fewer deaths. Guns do not kill people, people kill people, and if a criminal plans to harm someone, the will find a
Gun debate What is your outlook on the gun eschew about getting gun control or not have gun control? I learned from the New York Times Upfront article is that there’s a lot of people getting gun and using them for killing people. I think that the gun is not the faut. “Since 1994, licensed gun dealers have been required to conduct background checks on potential burger” (pg6).
American Gun Control Laws In the United States of America, there are many laws on guns. The problem is there are too many gun control laws and this needs to change. There are so many laws that should not be in effect. Many people don’t even want gun control laws.
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, for instance, enshrines the right to bear arms as a means to safeguard personal freedom and protect against tyranny. Stricter gun control measures may infringe upon this constitutional right and erode the autonomy of law-abiding citizens. Restricting access to firearms disproportionately affects law-abiding citizens who rely on guns for self-defense, hunting, or sport shooting. It is essential to recognize that responsible gun ownership should not be penalized due to the actions of a few individuals who misuse
Gun control is what restricts people from buying and using guns, but these laws are not strengthened at the extent they need to be strengthened. This leads to many people getting these guns and using them to cause mass shootings all over the U.S. For example, according to the Council on Foreign Relationship, a news article that covers major world issues, in 2017, mass shootings at a music festival in Las Vegas and at a church near San Antonio have rekindled the gun control debate (“U.S. Gun Policy: Global Comparisons”). The fact that gun control is still not tightened is a huge margin and error, and still causes mass shootings as we just covered. Many people have said that we should not allow guns to be purchased, which would seem like the logical option. However, according to the same source, Council on Foreign Relationship, some states, such as Idaho, Alaska, and Kansas, have passed various laws attempting to nullify
Gun control is a concept that implies that if there are a set of regulations that restrict how civilians sell, possess,or use firearms, the abuse of them won’t be a possible danger to the unarmed. Those who side completely with this concept are known as civilians who are pro-gun control. Others who are under the belief that no possible amount of laws can tame the abuse of firearms and should only be handled by the military are known as those who are anti-gun control. Truthfully, I position myself amongst those who are pro-gun control, however I feel the laws that are currently in action to help maintain control of guns are not the most sincere and should be re-established. First off, the existing gun control laws are as
Many people believe that there should be many gun control laws in place, they also believe that it will reduce crime and make everything happy and crime will just disappear. We all know that in reality crime is not just going to miraculously disappear. If there is something that 's illegal and there 's a demand for it, there will be an organized crime. If less gun control laws were in affect, then more citizens would be able to protect themselves. “The second amendment of the US constitution protects individual gun ownership”(procon.org).
Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.
Gun Control Gun control has become a polarizing and controversial issue around the globe. There have been many reported issues of mass shootings both in schools and in the public, making it a hot button issue. Proponents argue that, if the government strictly controls the ownership of guns, such tragedies can be prevented. Most Americans have an obsession with guns because the law allows them to do so. Therefore, they are always ready to scoff at anyone trying to control gun ownership.
Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.
Adopting new and more strict gun laws, feuds with the second amendment. Everyone in the U.S. has the right to bear arms. People that believe in less gun laws will argue that if you take away or make the laws more strict. That their rights are interrupted or taken away from themselves. Like I mentioned before, cities with the most strict laws have the highest gun death total.
Over the past decade, the amount of United States citizens killed by guns has skyrocketed. Many of these deaths are the result of a gun legally getting into the hands of an unstable person who should not have a gun. These criminals and mentally ill people use guns to take the lives of innocent children, women, and men every single day. Many people argue that the second amendment gives them the right to bare arms and no one can take that away from them, however, this amendment is a large part of the reason why so many undeserving people are able to obtain a gun. America needs stricter gun control laws because they will help decrease the immense number of gun deaths every day and lessen the chances of the wrong person getting their hands on a gun.
Gun Control is an emotional topic that elicits very strong emotions and arguments. It seems rare to find anyone that has not formed a solid opinion, is dogmatic, and of the opinion that anyone who dissents with them is of less intelligence. Just the definition of Gun Control can spark a heated debate. On one side of the spectrum appears to be those who want to move to a model such as those in Europe by banning all privately owned firearms. The other extreme is a staunch interpretation of the Second Amendment that every American has the right to own any firearm without registration or tracking by the Federal Government an anything less is unacceptable Gun Control.