The Great Man Theory
One of the early century ideas of leadership, which is still favoured in certain groups/circles of today, is that leadership is a natural characteristic that one are born with.
This is the Great Man Theory which claim that general and great leaders in particular are born and not made. (Helen L. Eckmann, N.d).According to the theory, leadership consist of certain qualities like charm, authoritative, reliable instinct, judgment, courageous, intelligence and action orientation which cannot be learnt or taught. (Helen L. Eckmann, N.d).
One either has the trait or not. It is said that these leadership qualities run in the family (genes) (Anon, N.d).. In other words, you are born with it, or carried from generation-to-generation.
…show more content…
One can say that there was something in their physiology, anatomy, and personality which made them “unique” compared to the average citizen.
Implications of the Great Man Theory (saying leaders are born and not made)
Leaders are seen as gifts of God to the human race. A part of divinity is assigned to leaders and their actions. (Helen L. Eckmann, N.d). The theory ignore the belief that someone can be trained for roles and leadership positions. Leadership characteristics cannot be addressed through exposure and education. (Helen L. Eckmann, N.d).
Critique of the
…show more content…
Zaccaro, he says that “leader traits can be defined as relatively coherent and integrated patterns of personal characteristics, reflecting a range of individual differences, that foster consistent leadership effectiveness across a variety of group and organizational situations. I believe that a con of this theory is that the theory only focuses on the traits when it should also consider how the traits are implemented and work together to influence performance. Another con is that it should also include internal and external factors that shape a person such as values and social skills…”(Monique Padilla,
Wherever human beings are accumulated together in large numbers, they need leadership. Even a school needs a principle to mentor and escalate the school’s rank. Armies need generals to lead them to a courageous victory. Civilians need governments, captains of industry and intellectual leaders of thought as well. However, There are characteristics common to most great leaders that can be picked out.
This is a valuable trait of a leader that I embody. Another trait that is vital is responsibility. To keep up with my busy schedule that includes schoolwork, sports, service, as well as being social, I stay very organized and responsible. This helps me greatly in my endeavors as a leader, as do the other qualities I
In life I have noticed leadership to be a key attribute of mine. This was not a quality I would seek to obtain, it was more like one bestowed upon me. Growing up I was the second oldest and only daughter of four children. Though we were rich in spirit, financial hardships made it difficult and at times impossible to fulfill the basic needs and wants of most kids. With the odds stacked against us, I began at a young age to realize that I had to take charge, I had to make a change, I had to lead.
All these characteristics of a great leader are found in
Trait theory states that leaders are born, and they are not made. Everyone has the personality that can give them leadership positions. With the right condition, anyone can be a good leader (Colbert, et al.
Another thing about leadership is its an art. People can’t just become a leader, it’s inside of them just waiting for an opportunity to reveal itself. “Educators, health professionals, and parents all agree that as society grows more complex, young people are in greater need than ever for grounding in the basic values that determine character”(Hirschmann 12). This shows that the higher ups in
Those individuals who were believed to have these inherent skills were people of very influential status, wartime heroes and those of great wealth. The people who emerge or are most picked to lead have distinctive drives and character profiles (Nicholson, 2013, p.16). Leadership Thought Development from 1900 – 1970 The thought of leadership evolved from the Great Man Theory to Trait Theory and Behavior Theory. The trait theory focuses on identifying distinctive personality traits and characteristics that are associated to successful leadership.
Probably one of the most infamous and controversial ideologies of the 16th century, the prince by Machiavelli has been a reference for many great leaders and academicians since it was published. The book provides historically tested and proven principles of leadership. The prince has been described as a manual for those who want to win and retain power. While some may argue that leadership is an inherent trait in human, leaders are made, not born. Making a great leader out of a person is not just a matter of identifying the leadership traits, skill and talents of the individual, but harnessing the traits, develop them and eventually mastering how to be leader.
Critical Review of Leadership Theories There have been a variety of theorists who have tried to understand how good leaders acquire their skills and whether the components which make up a successful leader are hereditary or learned. Many Studies have been made using twins to identify that about forty percent of differences in personality are hereditary. (Vernon et al., 1998) From this we can see that it is not only a matter of whether a person in born with these skills but one must also build on them to become a successful leader.
From the mainstream perspective, he has shown different types of leadership. It also includes several theories like trait, skill, behavior, contingency and transformational. Trait theory states that the personality of a person would determine if he or she will be able to lead. In case of Steve Jobs, his personality was radiant and flamboyant. He was confident, committed and charismatic to take any leap or risk with the support of his team and customers to pursue his aspiration (Katzenbach, 2012).
Individual Reflective Paper Introduction Leadership, a controversial concept, has been studied for centuries. Scholars who study leadership have argued with the insight of leadership for many decades and finally promote a wide range of understandings of it. This course “values and leadership” introduces the basic principles and concepts about leadership, and provides us with some conceptual knowledge and practical approaches to be an outstanding leaders. I chose to take this course because I am interested in the topic about leadership.
Dr. Gardner, research suggests that genetics account for approximately 30% of the variance leadership role occupancy. Another 10-15% is related to external work and life events (Arvey, Avolio, Zhen, & Krueger, 2007). Some environmental variables that influence leadership emergence and development include educational, family, and prior work experiences (Arvey et al., 2007). The remaining comes from learned behavior. Leaders are ultimately developed through experience, new knowledge, reflection, and time to practice (Ruvolo, Petersen, & LeBoeuf, 2004).
This paper will examine the three leadership theories, identify how they apply to my practice, and explore how these theories interact with each other. The Trait Leadership Theory is based on the belief that a person is born with special traits contributing to natural leadership abilities. Studies of famous historical leaders have been used to identify various traits for this theory. Although the list of traits differs from study to study, there are five major traits that are consistent throughout most studies.
This paper is going to encompass different leadership theories and their relevance to my own personal personality and method of leadership. There will be information on the advantages and disadvantages of the leadership theories and information on each including examples. The purpose of this paper is to view various kinds of leadership theories and apply them to a real-life scenario. Leadership Theories There are quite a few different leadership theories available for people to take information from and use in business settings and even personal settings.
According to the book, "individuals who exhibit traits as a leader able to recognize someone who is a leader of leaders does not mean they managed to get each group to achieve its goals. " theories of leadership behaviour suggests that certain people are able to distinguish the behaviour of a leader by himself and not from