The central focus of the assigned Source Two states that the development of the human society and the fact that some countries were more advanced and enriched than other countries, are caused from the historical advantages that only a little amount of countries had possessed. The key word here, “historical advantage” can be interpreted as the historical backgrounds of each country that had made some places possible to be more dominant than other regions. The assigned Source Two provides a brief understanding of why some countries were able to continuously and successfully be developed. Jared Diamond’s theory clearly argues that geography was the prime reason why some locations could not be as globally wealthy as others and why they weren’t …show more content…
Farming was believed to be very beneficial and significant to the early society, because farming meant that individuals did not have to journey to locate food. Farming helped them create early civilization by enabling them to settle in one place and tend to their farming. Also, this brilliant kind of agriculture was very convenient compared to hunting, since hunting was time-consuming and inefficient for gathering food. One great example of this would be the Europe’s victory over the Zulus. Europeans were able to defeat the Zulus with their advanced weaponries that they’ve developed over the years. To be honest, without their “head start” on agriculture, they would not have had the skills and power to dominate the Zulus. In Guns, Germs, and Steel, Diamond states a very agreeable opinion regarding farming: “If there is more food, more workers can be fed, and there will be more individuals working to build human society.” Farming determines a country’s power; countries with longer history of farming are the most prosperous ones today. New Guineans, for example, had not put much effort into advancing agriculture and this had led them to lack of raw materials and livestocks. This argument links to Jared Diamond’s theory because they share a similarity that explains how historical advantages of agriculture assisted countries with development . In contrast, another opinion on the source is that European domination was not just caused by farming, but also by the contributions from non-European regions. This seems very unlikely, because how would a country have the power to support another country if they don’t even have the ability to help themselves? Therefore, Jared Diamond’s theory encourages the idea that the development of human society is far most shaped by the historical
Jared Diamond’s thesis in Guns, Germs, and Steel is erroneous because it was mainly the inventions of the Industrial Revolution, specifically the light bulb and railway train, that really separated the European West from the rest of the world and enabled European global domination. The inventions of both the railway train and light bulb had profound impacts on improving manufacturing and transportation efficiency in European countries at different times throughout the nineteenth century. Jared Diamond explains why the Americas or in Africa did not surpass and become global dominants: “Diffusion was slower in Africa and especially in the Americas, because of those continents’ north-south major axes and geographic and ecological barriers”(Diamond
This theory, however, tended to disregard cultural difference internal class conflict, and inside struggles for power within a nation. The dependency theory offers a more valid explanation. The dependency theory explains the only reason that Europe and North America advanced was because they were able to use other countries and, by weakening the development of other countries, were able to further advance their own countries. The agricultural economies got increasingly poor as the industrialized nations with which they dealt would gain wealth. This is seen in more often in history and so seems a more reliable theory than the modernization
Chapter Review (pg. 6-29) A: Human migration across the globe was the complete spread of the human species over much of the earth’s surface. The species began in eastern Africa; most types of humans come from this region, in the present day countries of Tazmania, Kenya, and Uganda. Main discoveries, especially fire and the use of animal skins for clothing-both of which allowed people to live in colder climates-facilitated the spread of Paleolithic groups. The first people moved out of Africa about 750,000 years ago.
How did the dominant countries of the world come to be dominant? Or, how did people living in the same time period, with crude and primitive technology come to overthrow other neighboring countries? Especially since these countries were inhabited by people with relatively the same intelligence levels as themselves. However, some historians would conclude that intelligence was, in fact, the main deciding factor for the overthrow of some countries. However, in this book, Jared Diamond tells how guns, germs, and steel are, in effect, the reasons for some cultures being superior over others.
While Europeans explored disparate regions of the world they experienced the exceptionally contrasting culturing of different regions (Doc 3). Speakers, such as Thomas Babington, expressed that their culture was superior to others. Additionally, in plain light it seems like Europe would be heavily affected economically. Although Europe was positively affected, the overall impact of the economy was limited. The opportunities in other regions deflected Europe’s focus from the option of modernizing their own economy.
For the first time, because of farming, people had a surplus of food. The surplus of food allowed for people to become artisans, so not
In response to the declining trade and vanishing cities, money became scarce. From 800 to 1200 CE however, the climate increased to better fit the requirements of farming. Farm production increased as a result of the climate change, the new three-field system, and the transfer from oxen to horsepower. Europe, which had earlier been described as a “region of poverty-stricken farming communities” (Doc. A) was filled with nutrient people.
Farming was useful for crops like wheat but corn, pumpkin and beans were planted because they were able to grow in the poor soil they had.
“The Importance of the Neolithic Revolution” is an article written by William Howells that focuses in on what the Neolithic Revolution was like all over the world. Also the definition of single site theory zeros in on what the Neolithic Revolution was like in one place. These two theories contradict and oppose each other. One theory of the Neolithic Revolution was single site theory.
Many countries during this time period scrambled to grab as much land as they could to conquer it for their own benefit, at the expense of their country’s people and the exploitation of the uncivilized, leaving few to reap the benefits of the ever-expanding
The Nutty Professor Why is agriculture so important? Agriculture is the process of farming animals and plants for human consumption. This process is important because it controls what we put into our body. Naturally, any change made in this field affects everyone. One man made significant contributions to this practice.
In the documentary Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond, he explains his theory of how people live different lives by people being poorer than others. He also explains how people in the past lived and how they farmed crops, hunted animals, and built their own homes out of dry sand. Jared also explains how some societies are more materially successful than others. He compares societal success to geography, food production, immunity to germs, the domestication of animal, and use of steel.
Labor systems have been the foundation for civilizations since the beginning of time. Who did what and how they benefited each other, in other words, specialization of labor, came to be a defining factor in whether a society was truly a civilization or not. Most great civilizations were founded on agricultural labor systems, and societies with no systematic format on their workforce were seldom able to take the main stage in world history. Between 1450 and 1750, the Americas began to mark their place in the world, proving they were just as relevant as Europe, Africa, or Asia. The labor systems established during 1450-1750 were key factors in how they were able to do so.
Have you ever wondered what Agricultural Revolution was and if it had a positive or negative effect on human civilization? Well, the Agricultural Revolution had a huge effect on civilization. It was when humans discovered how to farm! This took place from about 10,000 B.C to about 3,000 B.C. I believe it had a positive effect on human civilization for a couple of reasons.
New agricultural technology changed the early middle ages for the better. The agricultural revolution of the middle ages meant a technical advance in farming which makes lives of those involved