The Hobby Lobby store filed the case against the Secretary Department of Health and Human Services stating that the contraceptive method doesn’t match their religious faith. In fact, they were requested to pay the insurance fee. For them, they said that paying for contraception under the Affordable Care Act contradict the federal law protecting religious freedom.
According to IIT Chicago College of Law (n.d.), the contraception requirement set by the government were against some religious policies. This is because, they were defined as a substantial burden which might cause the religions to support immoral behaviors such as abortion which goes beyond their principles. In fact, the Secretary Department of Health and Human Services violated
Stocking of Hobby Lobby shelves Hobby Lobby is a prominent arts and crafts store but also sells fabric and home decor items. With over 500 locations nationwide and a loyal customer base. As a result, Hobby Lobby must stock its shelves perfectly for easy to find merchandise. Tools required include; boxes, cutter, and
The Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Supreme Court Decision sought to answer a wildly asked question; Do for-profit corporations possess religious rights (Corbin)? This case, which took place in 2013-2014, evidenced the viable conflict between the Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. The outcome of the case was a 5-4 ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby stores (Morgan). This ruling essentially included for-profit corporations within
Christian-owned arts and crafts chain Hobby Lobby has been accused of hypocrisy after it was ordered to pay $3 million as fine over its role in an ancient artifact smuggling case. Hobby Lobby president Steve Green started collecting ancient artifacts in 2009 for a huge Bible museum to be opened in Washington. On July 5,the Oklahoma City-based corporation agreed to pay the ordered fine after it was embroiled in the smuggling of ancient clay tablets and other archaeological objects which could have been looted from Iraq, the Chicago Tribune details.
The owners of Hobby Lobby Stores Inc., the Greens, devoted Christians and married couple who filed a suit back in November 26, 2013. This lawsuit was filed because of what the Green’s had to offer their employees in their health care agreement. Being devoted Christians, it is against most people’s belief to use contraceptives. As a business owner who is closed on Sundays and pays 90 percent more above the federal minimum wage, it 's safe to say that the Green’s mix their religious beliefs into their business and make sure there employees are taken care of. Out of 20 FDA approved contraceptives that are federally mandated, the Green’s had only objection to four of them.
On June 30, 2014, the Supreme Court granted a landmark victory for religious liberty, ruling that family-owned corporations do not lose their religious freedom and could hold religious objections that allow them to opt out of the insurance coverage for contraception under the Affordable Care Act. The decision caused and uproar and ignited protests around the nation. No matter how unpopular the ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby was or how you feel about contraceptives, the ruling was a victory for believers who seek to live by faith and arguably, no other family in America, fit this mold more than the Green family. David Green, Hobby Lobby’s founder, and CEO, consistently made business decisions and choices based on biblical principles and his
Should corporations be given religious freedom? The case of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. has opened the door for corporations to deny all kinds of protections and laws to their employees. What if the corporation in question was a car insurance company, and they did not want to cover their employees birth control? Would they still hold the same position if a citizen (or a whole state) claimed religious exemption to being forced to purchase car insurance?
A recent federal lawsuit has been filed by the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) challenging the constitutionality of three provisions of the Setonia’s Abortion Laws. The three provisions ACLU are challenging are as follows (McCauliff): • Law which prevents state health officials from renewing or issuing licenses to abortion clinics located with 2000 feet of an elementary school (McCauliff). • Law which requires physicians performing abortions to complete 10 hours annually of continuing medical education on abortion procedures (McCauliff). • Law which requires abortion providers to give every patient a copy of her medical records, regardless of whether the patient requests such records (McCauliff).
These directors were claiming that the ruling that led to their conviction had violated the 14th Amendment, which states citizens’ rights to privacy and equal protections from the laws. Issue: Is there existence of a right in the Bill of Rights allowing married couples to use contraceptives to prevent conception? Decision: Yes.
Opinion: I believe with the ruling. I am on the same page with Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. I agree 100% with his writing for the court, which stated that family-owned companies like Hobby Lobby should not be enforced to recompense for insurance coverage for contraception for workers over their religious oppositions. I believe that this ruling is accurate because it means that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 is efficient and does what it says that it does.
The government gave the Green family an unfair choice. They could either provide the contraceptives and go against their faith or they would have to pay high dollar fines. The Court saw this as an unfair punishment and thus ruled in their favor. Barbara Green, co-owner of Hobby Lobby, said: “Today the nation’s highest court has re-affirmed the vital importance of religious liberty as one of our country’s founding principles.” (The Decision, hobbylobbycase.com).
This mandate relieved the burden of costs for non-profit organizations. However, under this mandate, contraceptive coverage is still delivered through their health insurance plans. 3. According to the doctrine of the Catholic Church,
The Contraceptive mandate case is a very important case for the diversity of our country. This case deals with Hobby Lobby’s Christian faith. Hobby Lobby is a very religious corporation, but does not offer free insurance coverage to its employees because it’s against their religion. . A business or corporation has the same rights of political and religious expression as individuals. Since President Obama’s health care law took action it now requires health insurance to be provided to all employees.
With almost half the nation divided among their views, abortion remains one of the most controversial topics in our society. Since Roe v. Wade, our views in society as well as following court cases have been progressing toward the woman’s right to choose. The precedent set by Roe v. Wade made the Supreme Court acknowledge that it cannot rule specifically when life begins and it also affirms that it is the woman’s right to have an abortion under the 14th Amendment. In the 1st Amendment, the Establishment Clause forbids the government from passing laws “which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion over another”. Many Christian pro-lifers use their religious beliefs to dispute when life begins.
Women’s rights have been a long struggle in America’s legal system, as well as in the religious world, for many decades and women continue to have challenges, concerns, and struggles today. Fighting for what is best for their bodies such as a woman’s right to contraceptives to control whether she will get pregnant or not was not ideal for religious and personal reasons but would find a worthy advocate in a woman who would dedicate her life for women’s reproductive rights. The right for a woman to have an abortion became a legal battle that went all the way to the Supreme Courts in a very well-known case. It has always been a double standard in what was right and wrong, moral or immoral, towards women than men. A man was looked at with respect
The perfect example of this issue is the Hobby Lobby case (Source #1). The issue started after the company refused to provide healthcare for their employees that support abortions. The government immediately stepped in even though it was the company 's religious beliefs. This decision should have been left to the church. The Hobby Lobby company has the right as a Christian ran business, to refuse any non-biblical procedures the government is trying to force upon