Chavez also focused on the principals and the ideas of other nonviolent philosophers. Cesar Chavez began reading about other nonviolent changes that impacted the world such as the civil rights movement and African Americans suffering from segregation. Researching about other nonviolent changes inspired Chavez to accomplish a social change. As stated in many books Chavez admired Gandhi because of the nonviolent ideas he incorporated in order to defeat the British Empire. Although Chavez did not have the opportunity to meet Gandhi in person he decided to incorporate some of his Gandhian Principals especially the idea of fasting. In Gandhi Chavez found a role model, a leader who inspired him to help the poor defeat the powerful. Through Studying …show more content…
By searching about nonviolent principles Chavez started to show his community that in order to make a change one had to love the opponent and never respond with acts of violence because it lead only to loosing against the opponent. Chavez also told his people in the Mexico Independence of 1965, “We are engaged in another struggle for the freedom and dignity which poverty denies us. But it must be a nonviolent struggle even if violence is used against us. Violence can only hurt us and our cause.” (Chavez qtd. in Cortright 77). This demonstrating that acts of violence lead to not obtaining the goals. Moreover one of the acts that Chavez most admired about Gandhi was the act of fasting during strikes. According to the book “Gandhi and Beyond” Chavez acquired similar goals from Gandhi. For example when Gandhi fasted he had the belief that fasting helped him purified himself and gain spiritual powers as well as increasing the hearts and minds of his followers (Cortright 91). Similarly Chavez had similar goals. Chavez viewed fasting as a way to also acquire his spiritual powers which lead him to achieve his objectives. Chavez participated in many strikes fasting. Some for instance to support justice for lettuce
In line 62 Chavez also provides a reference to Gandhi who was well known for his idea of nonviolence and promoting it. Next, Cesar Chavez uses logos as a rhetorical device
By providing his allusion in his speech Chavez adds evidence of a non-violent protest that led the revolution of a country. " As Ghandi taught... Perfect instrument of nonviolent change. " This lets the reader compare the current situation of civil unrest to Ghandi's situation of civil unrest. Ghandi is the prime example of peace and what he believes in is the ideology of peaceful protestors in America's civil rights movement.
He uses Gandhi, a very respected man and a firm believer of nonviolence, to show how successful peace is. Gandhi uses the example of boycotting to show a “nearly perfect” example of a nonviolent action. He continues with a violent action where helpless and poor people are killed. This shows that the nonviolent effort is proven to be more effective and successful. Chavez states that millions of people stand behind nonviolence, implying that nonviolence is more effective because they “attract people’s support”, opposed to discouragement and death.
In 1965, a Filipino union group called The Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee “struck when the Delano grape growers cut the pay rates during harvest” (Rick Tejada-Flores PBS). Because of this, the strike went on, and Chavez became the leader, according to PBS. As a result, the grape strike began and lasted for five years (Encyclopedia of World Biography). Because Chavez learned writings from St. Francis and Gandhi, he decided to put that into play. According to PBS, Chavez’ group would fight without the use of violence.
Chavez was an inspirational speaker and that is why there is also more Mexican Americans register to vote. Chavez organized many marches and boycotts to help farm workers. He also started strikes and boycotts against the Grape Farms and won. He affected the progress of civil rights so much that there was a funeral for him. It was the largest funeral of any labor leader in the history of the United States.
The Gospel of Cesar Chavez: My Faith in Action, by Mario T. Garcia, uses Cesar Chavez’s own words to express his spiritual and religious personality and how it led him to organize a movement for a change in the farm workers’ lifestyle of America. Through his experiences and observations with religion and spirituality growing up, Cesar created his own myth by conveying nonviolence and self-sacrifice as the basis of his American religious experience. Thus, paving the way towards reform for farm workers. To be able to understand Cesar’s motive behind his movement, violence and nonviolence needs to be distinguished. A violent movement is a protest that is set up to achieve a goal by using violent acts (riots, house raids, etc.).
The civil rights movement was a strong topic of discussion in politics during the mid-twentieth century. Martin Luther King Jr., one of the most influential leaders of the civil rights movement, was assassinated which caused many protests and calls for violence. In Cesar Chavez’s speech, he is telling the people that nonviolence resistance is the best way to go about the situation. Chavez’s uses juxtaposition, diction, and rhetorical appeals to strongly convey his argument about nonviolent resistance. To begin with, Chavez uses juxtaposition to contrast the effects of violent and nonviolent resistance.
Cesar Chavez, in his excerpt He showed us the Way, utilizes strong pathos, ethos and logos statements, precise diction, and valuable patterns of development to convey the power nonviolence has in fights for freedoms and rights. First, Chavez provides strong pathos, ethos and logos to convey the power nonviolent actions have to change the world for the better. He applies ethos to show that nonviolence is something that people are drawn to. In fact Chaves presents a great nonviolent advocate who lived during the segregation: “Dr. King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolences brings...”
In the first paragraph Chavez mentions Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, stating that Dr. King’s “entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings…” This reference to Dr. King causes those who know of his impact to realize that he lead a strong historical example of what nonviolence could achieve. By using Dr. King as an example it indicates that Chavez thinks that if nonviolence had heavily impacted the past, then it would most likely do the same in the present and future. Chavez also makes a reference to Gandhi and his nonviolent boycott in India, claiming that what he taught “is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change.” By using the word perfect to describe Gandhi’s teachings of nonviolence, it further supports Chavez’s stance for nonviolent resistance.
The assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. devastated a large majority of people around the world. His works of nonviolent acts against racism motivated many, including civil rights activist Cesar Chavez, to solve matters without resorting to inhumane behaviors. Inspired by Dr. King Jr.’s work, Chavez and his union of labor workers devoted themselves to helping those in need through peaceful protests. Similar methods are proven to be successful; Mahatma Gandhi, for instance, gained a great deal of supporters because of his pacifism and tranquil methods of boycotting against British domination. Despite brutal and savage methods of persuasion slowly gaining support, Chavez proves that nonviolent actions are superior; he does so by using ethos in order to uphold moral standards, logos (in reference to the past), and pathos to appeal to the emotions of his audience.
Cesar Chavez History Day Project One Mexican American farm worker dedicated his days to better the lives of his people, his name was Cesar Chavez. Horrendous treatment of farmworkers caused Chavez to take a stand for what he believed in, for no one should be treated poorly because of race or social class. During Chavez’s life, he organized peaceful protests, boycotts, as well as participated in a historic 36 day "Fast for life". Chavez not only changed the working rights for farm workers but subsequently gave dignity to the working class of America. The legacy that Cesar Chavez left behind was that he became the most important leader of the Latino people in the United States, and he founded the still standing United Farmworkers of America.
What made Cesar Chavez an Effective leader? Cesar Chavez was born in Yuma,Arizona in 1927. He moved a lot and went to 36 different schools. He lived through the Great Depression and worked in fruit and vegetable fields as a farmer. On a regular basis California farmers would face mistreatment and abuse mainly by the growers taking advantage of them all.
Gandhi was always steadfast on a nonviolent resistance. His fasts were demonstrations that he believed there was good in all humans. He fasted on several occasions. For example, he fasted to stop riots and most famously for freedom from English rule. Chavez, himself, would exhibit fasts throughout his life in the same manner as
Mentioning Gandhi, and stating his thought son the best ways peacefully cause change. This is showing the audience that Chavez realizes that these men have proved their methods the best, and he doesn't want to change them just try to use them for the benefit of the people. “ The boycott, as Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change, allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause”. This quote really does work so well because of the organization that is used by Chavez to convey Gandhi’s message. If Chavez had not eased this very power quotes into is writing, they would not have been hear the same way.
Cesar Chavez and Gandhi are both two different people that defended other people. They both wanted to accomplish an important goal that would change the future for other people to have their rights. Cesar wanted to get paid more money for what they were working for by protesting to the owner of the company and not eat the food the company distributed. Gandhi wanted India to be free once again and not ruled by Great Britain so he gather people to go protest to the government he wanted to accomplish a goal that would help the people of India. He was remembered to a model to the people for helping to free India.