How Did Frederick Douglass Conformed To Much Authority

663 Words3 Pages

Douglass claims in the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, by human nature, humans simply want to sense and be superior than others as it triggers the sensation of possessing authority over others. Individuals will possibly result to anything in order to obtain this state, to the point of brainwashing others whether it was desired or not by the individuals themselves.To experience the sensation of having authority, people conformed to such actions which can be shown in when, “Colonel Lloyd had three sons—Edward, Murray, and Daniel,—and three sons-in- law, Mr. Winder, Mr. Nicholson, and Mr. Lowndes. All of these lived at the Great House Farm, and enjoyed the luxury of whipping the servants when they pleased…”(Douglass 15). These people …show more content…

It is evident that all these people generally conformed to the common action of whipping the minorities as it stimulated the sense of being dominant. Knowing that whipping was a frequented and justified action, it implies that many desired for control and authority.Additionally, brainwashing the minorities was a common method for obtaining dominance which Douglass clarifies, “If they have anything to say of their masters, it is generally in their masters’ favor... I have been frequently asked, when a slave, if I had a kind master, and do not remember ever to have given a negative answer” (Douglass 16). It is visible that the slaveholders had brainwashed the slaves to only express what they prefer to hear from the lower class. There is no choice for the oppressed to report anything else than positive sayings about their masters as their lives are on the line. If they were to express their perception of their masters in a negative manner, there would be no gain of power for the masters nor would there be a favorable outcome for the

Open Document