ipl-logo

How Did The Framers Maintain The Power Of Government

818 Words4 Pages

The Framers of the Constitution had doubts about government operations and how governments worked. They were inclined to think the governments (kings) take away power from the people. However, they understood that some type of system was necessary for a nation to function. The Framers needed to make sure the government did not have complete control of the people. Creating Federalism in the United States allowed the government to set rules and standards for citizens while keeping checks and balances on their own powers. The Framers wanted essentially, for the people to govern themselves by choosing the politicians that were in place to govern them. As well as having the option to decide if an elected official is not doing their job properly or governing the country properly. The president serves not only as the head of the executive branch of government, but also as the commander in chief of the armed forces. As chief executive, the president operates and controls the different executive agencies, such as the Department of …show more content…

Others saw it the increase of the U. S. to the position of a world authority. The seeming dominance in war as a logical consequence of the mortifying influence of control. They maintained that presidents catered to popular sentiment because, often in the guise of patriotism, strong, violent muscle-flexing against foreign foes was rewarded at the ballot box (Power). There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person" (Secondat, Montesquieu). "The accumulation of all power, legislative, executive, and judiciary in the same hands...may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny" (Madison). All legislative Powers are entrusted in the Congress and it consist of the Senate and House of Representatives. However, the executive power is completely bestowed to the

Show More
Related

  • The Framers Of The United States Constitutional System

    516 Words  | 3 Pages

    The framers of the United States Constitution intentionally built points of conflict and tension into the constitutional system for several reasons. First, the framers established a system of checks and balances among the three branches of government—the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. This division of powers creates a dynamic where each branch has the ability to limit or counteract the actions of the other branches. This intentional separation of powers leads to inevitable conflicts and tensions as each branch seeks to assert its authority and protect its interests. Next the framers created a federal system of government, where power is divided between the national government and state governments, also known as federalism.

    Read More

  • The Legislative Branch: The Most Power

    87 Words  | 1 Pages

    Out of all the branches the legislative branch has the most power. They have to over view the president 's actions and decisions, if they don 't agree with it they can stop him. They control the taxes money, and relationships between states. They have the power to declare way, and make their own laws. The other branches have limited power and higher supervision, but the legislative branch has enough power to control itself.

    Read More

  • How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

    455 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Federalist Papers #47 James Madison states, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very

    Read More

  • Why Did The Federalists Create A Strong Central Government

    404 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalists wanted a representative democracy under which there would be a strong central government. Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government had little power other than to declare war, borrow and coin money, and regulate trade with Native Americans, along with a few others; it lacked the authority to regulate commerce among states, levy taxes, create a standing army, or prevent discrimination among states (Lowi) . The issues caused by the lack of authority of the central government quickly called for the need for change. This sculpted the Federalists’ objective to create a strong national government which had concrete governmental power strong enough to create unity among the states. One main focus for the Federalists

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography: President Of The Federal Office Of President

    440 Words  | 2 Pages

    The president directs the executive branch of the federal government and is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces. In contemporary times, the president is looked upon as one of the world's most powerful political figures and as the leader of the only remaining global superpower.[11][12][13][14] The role includes responsibility for the world's most expensive military that has the second largest nuclear arsenal. The president also leads the nation with the largest economy by nominal GDP.

    Read More

  • Can Congress Be The Dominant Force In Foreign Policymaking Without Congress Approval?

    1214 Words  | 5 Pages

    Even though Congress and the president are pretty much evenly split (49% Congress & 51% the president) with their powers, the president holds powers that Congress does not. He is the Chief Diplomat and the Commander in Chief. The president also holds an inherent power with executive orders. Executive orders give the president the ability to make some policies without the approval of Congress. Executive orders can be used to force Congress into making foreign policy by the president, through treaties.

    Read More

  • Powers Of The Federal Government Under The Articles Of Confederation

    243 Words  | 1 Pages

    The five Congressional Powers were to collect taxes and raise revenue, regulate commerce, declare war, maintain an army, and to make changes as needed to pursue these powers. They wanted to make sure no single authority would possess too much power. The powers the Executive Branch held were to make treaties but only if approved by two-thirds of the Senate, overseeing the

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast African Americans After The French And Indian War

    3946 Words  | 16 Pages

    They also thought that only wealthy and educated people should govern the states because the common people did not necessarily know what was best for the nation. The United States Constitution is a product of federalist strategies because it gives the federal government power to deal with national problems. The central government can enact laws, levy taxes, and declare

    Read More

  • Tyranny Dbq

    463 Words  | 2 Pages

    “The accumulation of all powers..in the same hands, whether of one or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, 1788) ( Background Essay) This quote explains the reasoning for one of the framers, (B) Separation of Powers. The framers of the constitution were created to prevent tyranny and create a stronger government that would hold the nation together. Tyranny ultimately means harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual-- like a king or dictator. The constitution guarded against tyranny in 4 ways: (A)Federalism, (B)Separation of Powers, (C)Checks & Balances, and (D)Small State-Large State.

    Read More

  • Framers Of The Constitution Dbq

    1017 Words  | 5 Pages

    With the hopes of unifying the sovereign states under one government that would better protect the rights of its citizens and protect the nation, the Framers of the Constitution met up to revise, but inevitably alter the premises of the Articles of Confederation. After much debating and compromising, the Framers set up the Constitution that gave the national government enumerated powers and reserved powers for the states, with some powers being shared among both spheres of government. Federalism is the separation of powers among the different levels in government (i.e., the national and state governments) along with the restrictions placed on each level of government to avoid tyranny. Some citizens, called the Antifederalists, feared the national

    Read More

  • Judicial Branch

    1681 Words  | 7 Pages

    The members of Congress Spend most of their time holding investigations and hearings in committee. Congress can also declare war in certain moments. The Executive Branch consists of the President, Vice President, Executive Office of the President, and the Cabinet. The President is the Commander-in- Chief of the armed forces and also the head of

    Read More

  • Power Of The President In The 20th And 21st Century

    447 Words  | 2 Pages

    The modern presidency powers have evolved from the evolution of the past combination of constitutional and evolutionary powers. The greatest fears that the anti-federalist once vision the President would have back in 1700 finally became fruitful from strong President Personalities. George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson were major influences in the early years of the 1800s, which shaped the President’s role in the national government. It was not until the 1930s after the 18th and 19th centuries when the shift of the dominant power of the Congress to the President in the national government. Then what is now seen in the 20th and 21st Century where the power of the executive branch currently has been at least equal power to the legislative

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay Against Tyranny

    669 Words  | 3 Pages

    However this idea was eventually scrapped and they wrote a whole new constitution. This constitution would protect America from tyranny, so they could keep a civilized and united country. The Constitution that was made helped defend America from almost all types of tyranny and is still helping us hundreds of years later. One way the Constitution prevented tyranny is by supporting Federalism.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Federalist 70

    1015 Words  | 5 Pages

    The American president, takes all the responsibility for what he does and he is watched by the other branches so there is no way that he can conceal or make mistake. Secondly, Hamilton asserts that there is the matter of cost. Some people recommend that an executive branch should be large. Thus, it will asks for more money to maintain that large council and that money is too high for a nation to be affordable. Lastly, before the Constitution was composed, keen men concurred that single presidency was a standout amongst the most outstanding elements of state

    Read More

  • Essay On Separation Of Powers

    714 Words  | 3 Pages

    The executive branch can check the laws congress wants to pass and can veto them if he disagrees. The Legislative branch can check the executive by accepting the already vetoed law and can impeach or fire the president out of office. The Justice Branch can make sure peoples rights and liberties are being followed and check if the laws follow the constitution's rules. In the text, it says “To further limit government power the framers provided for separation of powers the constitution separates the government into three branches Congress of the legislative branch makes the laws. The executive branch headed by the president carries out laws.

    Read More

More about How Did The Framers Maintain The Power Of Government

Open Document