Language is an important factor in speech, because people can be influenced in different ways. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare shows how characters get what they want by means of speech to different people. In the play, persuasion is used on many occasions for characters to get what they want. An act of persuasion happens in the Tragedy when Cassius is trying to persuade Brutus to get him to help plot the murder of Julius Caesar. When Cassius is trying to persuade Brutus, he makes a good point about how, “Th’ abuse of greatness is when it disjoins Remorse from Power. (Shakespeare 2.1.18-19). Cassius explains to Brutus about how a tyrant abuses his power, and finds happiness from that. He makes this point and connects this to Caesar. Eventually, Brutus agrees because he takes an oath to “bring justice for Rome.” Cassius uses his language to carve a negative image of Caesar in Brutus’ mind altering his emotions to get him to join the conspirators, which is an act of persuasion through emotions. Persuasion between …show more content…
When Mary Antony is giving his speech, he shows anger and sadness throughout the entire speech to show his pity for the murder. During his speech, he talks about a specific stab describing it as, “The most unkindest cut of all. For when the noble Caesar saw him stab, Ingratitude, more strong than traitors' arms, Quite vanquished him. Then burst his mighty heart” (Shakespeare 3.2.178-181). Brutus was considered as a best friend to Caesar, and when seeing a best friend betray another, it broke Mark Antony and stirred up the crowd emotionally, especially when they saw Mark Antony breaking down into tears. When Mark Antony read Caesar’s will, he used words like mighty and noble to praise Caesar. This type of language can affect the opinion of the crowd. The shift in emotions is what ultimately leads to the persuasion of the crowd and the downfall of the
“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” (George Orwell, 1984). William Shakespeare intensified his quality of work by insinuating manipulative and persuasive language within his writing. Cassius, a loyal server to Brutus, was easy to coax Brutus into rebelling against Julius Caesar, gaining an additional member to his group of conspirators. Cassius altered Brutus’ thoughts of Caesar’s ruling, within the use of multiple effective rhetorical techniques.
One of the ways Cassius does this is by saying that Brutus can, “endure the winter's cold as well as [Caesar]” and that he has “fed as well” too (Shakespeare 20-21). This comparing Brutus to Caesar shows that they are equal and, therefore there is no reason that Caesar should be in power and not Brutus. He also does this when he states “Brutus and Caesar.. Why should that name be sounded more than yours?... Write them together, yours is as fair a name” (Shakespeare 20-21).
Cassius' argument that he presents to Brutus in order to get him to join the conspiracy is effective in appealing to Brutus' love of democracy because he uses pathos and develops ethos. Cassius establishes his credibility to his friend Brutus by flattering him, so that Brutus does not suspect that he is being manipulated. As he prepares to use careful language to tip Brutus to his side, Cassius takes a moment to sing Brutus' praises, so Brutus will believe that all Cassius has to say is in his best interest. He begins by telling his friend, "...since you know you cannot see yourself / So well as by reflection, I, your glass, / Will modestly discover to yourself / That of yourself which you know not of" (Shakespeare 1.2.67-70).
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar In Act III Scene II in William Shakespeare’s play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Antony delivers a speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral. Antony uses a sarcastic, empathetic, and persuasive tone in order to turn the citizens of Rome against Caesar’s conspirators and murderers. Antony’s purpose is to convince the citizens of Rome that killing Caesar was unjust. He attempts to convince the plebeians that Brutus, Cassius, and the other conspirators are not as honorable or innocent as they are acting by delivering his speech in a manner that is hardly noticeable. He does it like this because does not want to overstep his boundaries or rules given to him by Brutus.
The ability to persuade and use rhetoric effectively is one of the most important themes in William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Several characters, such as Cassius and Brutus, employ rhetorical strategies. Cassius uses persuasive language to convince Brutus to support his effort to assassinate Caesar. Brutus uses logos in his speech at Caesar's burial to demonstrate rhetoric. The plan thickens as the play progresses, and Brutus, as well as some of the conspirators, become enraged with Julius Caesar.
In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony use rhetorical methods to craft a persuasive appeal that will make them more compelling when presenting their side to the audience. The purpose of Brutus' speech is to persuade his fellow citizens that the conspirators' actions were beneficial
In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Brutus and Marc Antony both give speeches to the city of Rome. This is immediately after Brutus had helped in stabbing Caesar to death. They both talk about how they feel about the events that had just occurred and tried persuade the people into siding with them respectfully. They use emotionally manipulative language to attract the feelings of the crowd to their points of view. They manipulate words including love, ambition, honorable, and Rome to do this.
Brutus starts off the speech by telling the audience his reasoning for Caesar’s murder, getting the crowd on his side. Knowing how to use devices properly gives Antony an advantage of winning over the audience. He uses all rhetorical appeals by repetition, deductive reasoning, and restating Brutus’ opposing viewpoints fairly and accurately. Antony provides a strong speech with many rhetorical devices to push the audience to agree with his argument. One of Antony’s best appeals was pathos.
In Cassius’s eloquent speech against Caesar, he primarily utilizes persuasion through tools such as pathos, rhetorical questions, and compare and contrast. Cassius uses pathos to begin his monologue when he claims, “I know that virtue be in you, Brutus, / As well as I do know your outward favor” (Shakespeare 1.2.95-96). By expressing that Brutus has “virtue” and “outward favor”, Cassius appeals to Brutus’s emotions, but not to an exaggerated extent. This emotional appeal is a persuasion technique because it is used in moderation and in pertinent locations. The context is appropriate since rather than using it as a tool to feed on Brutus’s emotions, Cassius only uses it to get Brutus’s attention as an appropriate hook.
His story of Caesar’s death riles up the crowd, but not enough to satisfy his desire for chaos. Antony furthers the crowd's emotions by comparing the crowd’s current actions to what Brutus’s would be in the same
Leaders derive their power from a range of sources – military force, wealth, rank. However, leaders that we most admire win followers through the skill of persuasion. The ability of a speaker to persuade his listeners to agree with him signals that he is a powerful and astute figure. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the character of Cassius attempts to convince Brutus that Caesar should be assassinated. Brutus, however, cares deeply for Caesar and is hesitant to kill the beloved hero of Rome.
After bringing out Caesar 's Dead body. Describing what a honorable man his was. And showing them how brutal his killing was. In act three the people are angered and overwhelmed the people kill an innocent man simply because he had the same name as one of the conspirators cinna . the complete chaos ensures rhom may not look seem like a positive reaction to antony 's speech but it is in fact what he wants which is shown through soliloquy through the lack of almost no reaction to brutus logical and ineffective speech it is obvious that antony 's speech is more effective over the people of rome as speeches as a whole this shows that emotional appeal causes a much bigger reaction than logic and reason.
In Julius Caesar, there are many times were characters appeal to another character to temper with their opinions and mental state. Mark Antony does this with the plebians at Caesar’s funeral when he tells them “You all did see that on Luprecal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition? Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and sure he is an honorable man” (3.2.105-108). Antony repeatedly uses the word “honorable” and contradicts Brutus to change the opinion of the crowd by getting them to question his judgment and ultimately believe that the conspirators were wrong in killing Caesar.
His speech was powerful, but not powerful enough. Not soon after, Mark Antony as made a great speech. He uses his words to completely change the crowd and they begin to follow him instead of Brutus. One debater, from Debate.org, argued that words depend on weapons for anything to be done. To an extent, this may be true but it is words that control the weapons.
Influential words can alter one's perspective, after having a set mindset for positive intentions. In Julius Caesar, a book by Shakespeare, Mark Anthony delivers a speech in Caesar's funeral with intentions that would alter the plebeians perspective of Brutus, and Brutus´s speech. Brutus had formerly convinced the group while speaking that his main purpose for killing caesar was for the best of Rome, and that Caesar, the emperor, was unfit for Rome. As a senator and friend to Caesar, Mark Anthony believes that's bogus, and has promised to Caesar and himself, that he will seek to get the praise and honor that Caesar deserves. When someone fights to get their message across, they use syntax, diction.. to persuade a strong group of people to