In Janice Mirikitani’s poem “Graciella,” the speaker dehumanizes Graciella by generalizing her and her people, comparing her and her son to animals, and reducing her down to the work that her body does. Referring to Graciella giving birth, the man under the elm comments that “they push them out like rabbits” (36). Given that Graciella is a form of the name Grace mostly used by Latin Americans and that Graciella is said to be “as good as a dozen ********,” which is a slur for illegal Latin American immigrants, it is probable that this “they” refers to Latin Americans (25). This example of diction both reduces Graciella’s individuality and stereotypes the behavior of all Latin Americans. The speaker also describes birth with the verb “push” which …show more content…
The speaker further dehumanizes Graciella by also comparing her son to an animal. When her son dies due to the pesticides leaching into her blood, “he died writhing like a hooked worm” (48). Worms are dirty, slimy, simple minded creatures that are often viewed as disgusting and by comparing his death to the impaling of a worm the speaker both illustrates his suffering and minimizes the importance of the child. Apart from generalizing her and comparing her to animals, the speaker further objectifies Graciella with specific diction choices when describing her. The speaker describes her only in terms of her work and her body. The first stanza introduces her in terms of her body performing work as the speaker says, “Graciella’s arms, / big like hammocks / swaying mounds of work” (1-3). The following four stanzas that focus on her begin with “From her body” twice, “Into her Body,” and “She did not work” (12, 29, 38, 49). Graciella as a person separate from her body or work is never directly …show more content…
As a worker who seemingly has no other options she must get paid in order to live and keep her family alive. Paradoxically, in order to get paid she has to sacrifice everything and value work above all else, even her own child. When she is in the field harvesting lettuce, “her big arms cradled the work, her hands like a weaver, threading the dirt to a rich, dark rug” (16-20). She treats her work as if it is a child. She specifically cradles her work, which is verbiage typically reserved for holding a child. Furthermore, the words “weaver,” “threading,” and “rug” seem out of place. She is working in a field, however, these words are typically seen in a domestic setting. It is clear that Graciella is as caring to the field as one would be to their household or family. This care and affection toward her work are contrasted with the lack of affection or attention she pays to her child. “From her body / she pushed a child” (29-30). “Pushed” is featured once again and is both sterile and nonchalant. This important moment and painfully emotional time of giving birth is described with no emotion. This act lacks care. To further demonstrate this lack of care “she doesn't miss a day” of work (35). Although seemingly she doesn’t have a choice, she is notably choosing work over caring for her child. Work is the center of
Why is taking off work to give birth a shame in the work place? It is those every babies that will become the future of America. Taking work leave should not be frown upon, it should be applauded. Senator Kristen Gillibrand, in her editorial explains why the US should adopt the Family and Medical Insurance Leave Act (FAMILY Act). First, Gillibrand incorporates progressive diction so the act comes across as a positive change.
She provides this to make her audience feel a sense of sympathy and guilt for these young girls and so that they have a reason to change child labor in all states.
Access to birth control and safe abortion procedures were absent during the time of Connie’s pregnancy in the 1930s, causing family disarray and bringing shame on her mother Jean. Due to social attitudes towards unplanned pregnancy, Jean views Connie’s actions as “dragging [the Wasteways] down to the bottom of the hill” and describes her daught as a “loose woman” with “no morals” The lack of reproductive rights within this era is shown through Connie’s mother, who implores that she has an abortion in order to preserve her and her family’s reputation within the community, which subsequently resulted in Connie’s death. Jordan condemns the little personal choices available to women in the 1930s, and contrasts this with Charlotte’s experiences of unplanned pregnancy in the early 21st century. When Charlotte faces the same situation as Connie, Stanzi reminds her, “your body, your choice”, meaning that she can either choose to have the baby or have an abortion at the local hospital, which is a safe and “short operation”, unlike Connies horrific “backyard abortion”. Charlotte’s safe and easy access to abortion poignantly contrasts with the lack of options available to Connie, illustrating the substantial improvement in reproductive right for women within Australian
The moment she gave birth something sunk into her mind, that she could never fully comprehend until that moment. As she holds her child in her arms, taking extra precautions, so that her child doesn’t get hurt, she realizes that it is now her job to take care of her baby. That her biggest concern is no longer herself, but the child who was not in her arms yesterday. That yesterday’s problems are no longer of concern to her. That it is her job to provide and raise a human being.
She portrays the distressed women arriving at “she thought was a comprehensive health care provider near her home in Columbus, Ohio”. When arriving the doctors told her not to abort her baby, causing her to land in a crisis pregnancy center. These non-profit organizations work to “obstruct women’s access to abortion”. Meaghan Winter utilizes this anecdote to shed light on a disheartening situation, opening the reader’s eyes to what is truly happening to women across the globe. She employ pathological appeal by emphasizing the corner many women are metaphorically jammed in,” when providers like Planned Parenthood are shut down” and how “they leave low-income women with few alternatives for reproductive and preventive health care”.
In addition, to avoid responsibility, “soon after [hearing of the pregnancy] the boy’s father got transferred from Tucson and the whole family moved to Oakland, California” (89). Sandi recognizes her position as a poor single mother and challenges it. By working, Sandi provides for herself and her child, subsequently defying the stereotype that are the sole men providers in a woman’s
Child Labor Analysis Child Labor was one of Florence Kelley’s main topics at a speech she gave in Philadelphia during a convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association. Kelley talks about all the horrors children were going through and the injustices they were suffering. She talks of the conditions children working in, the hours they were going in, and all in all, how wrong child labor was. Her purpose for this was to gain support of people to petition for the end of child labor. Kelley’s appeals to Ethos, Pathos and Logos through the use of great rhetoric is what allows her to achieve her purpose.
They didn’t know what to do when they found out that she was pregnant; they were young, they didn’t have any money, they were scared, they didn’t want to tell anybody, they didn’t know what to do, and the only option that they could see was to terminate the pregnancy. So that’s what they decided to do… they went to a clinic, they had the procedure done, and at first they felt relieved that all their problems had gone away. But then something happened that they did not expect… and that’s over the next few weeks, which turned into a few months, they began to feel an intense sadness… and a pain and an agony and a guilt that wouldn’t go away. They didn’t know what to do, so they finally went to see a counselor; they said look — tell us what to do, we just don’t know, and the counselor made a suggestion. The counselor said here’s what you need to do — stop acting like you had a procedure, and act like you had a death in the family.”
During this time, numerous babies were abandoned by their parents who either didn't want to keep it or couldn't afford to keep it. In the Gilded Age of America in New York City, mothers were either kind or cruel in the methods they used to get rid of their babies. In Jacob Riis's Waifs of New York City's Slums, the author has mixed feelings about the abandoning of babies. Riis relays a tone of understanding behind the reasoning of abandoning a baby due to his word choice while documenting his findings. However, he is also disgusted by some of the ways the mothers got rid of their babies.
Thank goodness, she turned out alright. But I’ll never risk it again. Never! The strain is simply too - too hellish,” (36). Larsen uses words provoking anxiety and horror to give the reader insight into Clare’s mind when she thinks about pregnancy and motherhood.
On the surface, Levin has made a strong emotional appeal with these new mothers, but has made the error of asking a person that is extremely attached to the child that they have just given birth to. When analyzed, the poll can be seen as a cheap way to confirm his view due to a mother’s strong emotional connection to a
Moreover, she reveals that stereotypes mark people as undesirable and separate them from the rest of society, thus impeding their assimilation. Cofer uses another simile when she details her experience with an American boy at her first formal dance: “ … [He] said in a resentful tone: ‘I thought you Latin girls were supposed to mature early’—my first instance of being thought of as a fruit or vegetable—I was supposed to ripen, not just grow into womanhood like other girls” (549). In this simile, Cofer shows how those who stereotype Latino women compare them to fruits and vegetables because both are supposed to mature rapidly. However, she denounces this comparison by emphasizing that it dehumanizes Latino women and reduces them to the status of mere plants while creating a
Sallie Tisdale describes an uneducated sixteen-year-old girl that doesn’t even know how babies are formed. It was not the girl’s fault for getting pregnant; she was raped (Tisdale 416). Knowing this, the audience, like the author, feels compassion for the girl. It would be unfair to the girl if she couldn’t have the abortion. The audience recognizes that although abortion is cruel, it is needed.
Sethe embraces the dominant values of idealised maternity. Sethe’s fantasy is
This shows what she had to endure to try to keep her baby healthy. It appeals to the loving protective side of the reader. It makes them think about what the baby must be going through beacuase of their economic situation. Rhetorical questions are used to directly engage the