One characteristic of empires and civilizations is that they sometimes purposefully, sometimes inadvertently share aspects of their culture with neighboring and future societies. Both Greece and Rome were influential forces in the Mediterranean Region during the Hellenistic era. Each was instrumental in the transmission of technology in terms of architecture, military innovation, and political organization across the western world. The Greek civilization was a networked group of city states who benefitted from their ability to share ideas, develop new ways of thinking and technologies, where as the Roman
Empire was more concerned with demonstrating a sense of supreme power and the expansion of their territorial influence to outside cultures.
…show more content…
Another brilliant strategy of the Greeks was to create stable war alliances with neighboring civilizations by having generals marry women from potential opponents so as to form an alliance, this occured to Philip II from Macedonia, who at the end of his life had seven wives, all creating a web of alliances for the greek military. In the Roman Empire, the military was used primarily for expansion and protection of borders and citizens. With Rome as the center of the Roman Empire’s military, their naval capability was highly developed and contributed greatly to their expansion. At one point the empire was expanded into Spain, as far east as Egypt, and as far north as now Great Britain.
Their naval capabilities also facilitated their involvement in the Indian Ocean trading routes. Another of the notable accomplishments of the Roman military was the building of their Roman Roads. The roads were designed and built to both expand and protect the empire's borders, as well as transport large caravans of soldiers and supplies to the edges of the empire while keeping the cargo safe from invaders.
The Roman road was a technological feat of its time. They also built towering and decadent arches
…show more content…
Both the city states of Greece and the Roman Empire had distinctly different and yet powerful political systems. Both systems influenced many civilizations and empires and were respected by existing societies. In greece, most notably in Athens, a form a government never seen before was put in to play; Democracy. The democracy in Athens was a system of government unique to Athens and founded by the teachings and knowledge of Cleisthenes. Democracy was an early system of representative government, where the citizens of Athens elected officials to rule. The officials were elected from citizens of their social and economic class, this was decided so that the government would consist of officials from every part of society. The ultimate goal was to maintain organization in society.
The political innovation of democracy in Athens arose out of the vast amount of intellect and knowledge that thrived in the city. In Athens, many ways of using human thought thrived, some examples include: philosophy, medicine, theater, and discourse. In the Roman empire, however, innovative ways of
The Roman Civilization, which lasted from 509 BCE to 476 CE and was located in present day Italy, was one of history’s greatest empires. Ancient Rome met the criteria to being a civilization by having a powerful government, a capable military and vigorous trading. Rome’s remarkable government was the reason why Rome lasted for more than 500 years. It provided employment for hundreds of thousands of workers, and Rome experienced rapid growth because of that (Bently 271). Trade brought new products and traders exchanged vast ideas and thoughts which led to Rome being very prosperous (Bently 284).
The Roman military was the backbone of the Roman empire, they helped enforce laws and collect taxes, bult public works like roads, crushed rebellions, and protected Rome from outside invaders. Rome wasn’t always this big. If it wasn’t for how the Roman army operated, Rome
“Classical Ideal” In the documentary, “Art of the Western World-The Classical Ideal”, the narrator provides a history and a perspective on the Greek and Roman creation of the “Classical Ideal” to art and architecture. The narrator infers that the foundation of the two societies, namely their democratic falsifies and religious foundations, along with their focus on fitness, personal strength, calculations and intelligence, drove Greece and later Rome, to perfect their visions of balance, symmetry and beauty in their architecture and art. Greece and Rome are often held out as the greatest societies to have ever existed.
Nero was involved in fortification projects aimed at improving the defense of Rome and its territories. He constructed defensive walls and fortresses in strategic locations, such as along the Roman borders, to protect against external threats and maintain Roman control. Nero recognized the importance of naval power and initiated the expansion of the Roman navy. He established new naval bases and increased the size of the fleet, improving Rome's maritime capabilities. This expansion aimed to protect Rome's coastal territories, ensure control over vital trade routes, and project Roman power across the
China’s Han dynasty and the Romans valued technology in their civilizations, but they used technology for different reasons to accommodate their empire. The Hans relied heavily on agriculture and developed technology to make labor easier and more efficient, which is depicted by some of their technology like iron metallurgy and water systems. In contrast, the Romans focused primarily on science and mathematics, so the intellectuals looked down on technology as it was used by slaves and for their labor. Han China’s attitude towards technology was more appreciative and focused on its benefits toward labor than the Romans who viewed technology as inferior and for the laborers in their class-divided society. All the documents written by the Han,
The Roman empire was one of the most powerful or the most powerful empire in ancient times. A portion of this can be credited to its location in an area with good geography and climate. However, once the empire was vast enough its geography varied quite a bit. It went from the moderate climate of northern Italy too much warmer climates in northern Africa. In Italy, the central part of the empire, stood the city of Rome.
Democracy, a form of government, allows the people in their own nationality to vote for people in order for them to become representatives as a result to vote on new laws that would affect their own nationality. One of the many states of Greece, ancient Athens was indeed not truly democratic as a result of not inclusive, other than male citizens, to gain authority in ancient Athens, ¨Demokratia was ruled by male citizens only, excluding women, free foreigners(Metics) and slaves.¨(Document D), therefore ruling Athens was only accessible to male citizen since since women, free foreigners(Metics), and slaves were not allowed to rule as a result of not being male citizens. One of the many states of Greece, ancient Athens, was indeed not truly democratic as a result of not even using the essentials of democracy that is used today, “Thus, by our standards, it was oligarchy, not democracy.¨(Document D), therefore ancient Athens was not using democracy as their form of government, they were using oligarchy,another form of government in which a small group of people has power and control, as their form of government instead of democracy.
The Macedonian Empire and the Roman Empire both had an influential military. Throughout the histories of these empires, there were enemies they had to fight. To stay in control of their empires, having strong militaries was instrumental. The empires also used their military to expand far beyond their origins.
During the time period between 800 BCE and 300 BCE, sometimes called the Classical Period, Greece endured a plethora of cultural and political changes caused by the wars and conflicts in which Greece was involved in around the world. One change was the development of Greece into the first democracy around the year 500 BCE, proven by a variety of speeches and jury trials and their outcomes from that time period, and the adaptation of the Phoenician alphabet to develop a writing system in the 8th century BCE, as seen in many records of writing starting in this time period. Apart from all the changes endured by Greece in that time period, there were also some continuities like the continued use of slavery all throughout the empire until the year 1822, which assisted in developing the domestic lifestyle of Greece today.
Exploring Ancient Greek Governments The Ancient Greeks were particularly concerned with such fundamental questions as who should rule and how? Should sovereignty lie in the rule of law, the constitution, officials, or the citizens? These are not questions that plague those in power in our modern era however caused great conflict in Ancient Greece (Cartwright, 2013). From one polis to the next, each had the right to determine (some taken by force) how their city-state would be ran and by whom. Monarchy, tyranny, aristocracy, oligarchy and democracy are all forms of government the ruled the different polies in Ancient Greece.
Introduction The city-states of Athens and Greece were ruled by a diverse range of governments. Under these were the monarchy, the aristocracy, the tyranny, the oligarchy and the democracy. In this paper we will compare and contrast these 5 forms of governments in ancient Greek city-states. The Monarchy A monarchy is a type of government most recognizable by the fact that power rests in the hands of one person.
Political Life in Ancient Greece Political life in ancient Greece was remarkably diverse, as it encompassed a multitude of city-states, each with its own unique political systems and institutions. These city-states, or polis, varied in size, population, and political organization, resulting in a rich array of government models across the region. Furthermore, the political philosophies of ancient Greece left an indelible mark on modern political thought. Modern-day governments owe their very existence to the historical development of government and political life in ancient Greece. The significance of the political developments in ancient Greece cannot be overstated, as they laid the groundwork for the emergence of revolutionary forms of government
Geographical factors and the relationships between the neighboring cities were major aspects that influenced the growth of the Roman Empire. Rome is located close to the coastal line of Italy, which allowed it to gain many imperative advantages in both trading and warring with other rival nations; hence, Rome became a flourishing city with the advancements of economy, government, and military. The governmental system was also influenced by Greece’s government, which granted Rome numerous ideas of how to govern the society and its citizen. With its proper civilization strategies, Rome acquired many advantageous innovations, laws, customs, and militaristic armies to defend the city. Due to its location, Rome successfully innovated effective naval
In Athens democracy only adult male citizens could vote, however women and slaves did not have political rights. The adult male citizens had an assembly were they met and discussed and debated different legislative issues and decisions on foreign policy, final decisions and proclamations were carved in stone and erected in prominent places like Agora(gathering place/market place),democracy in Athens was direct democracy. The assembly met four times a month but according to the ancient Greek calendar 40 times a year. Ostracism was also something done in ancient Greek democracy, the members of assembly wrote name of the person whom they want to be banished on a piece of pottery and the one with moat voted would be exiled for 10 years ,this was really helpful because it kept those people with lofty aspirations from being aggressive.
For instance, both city-states had similar criteria for political participation in their governments. To participate in political decisions, a person had to be a citizen of the polis (city-state), an adult male, and born of Athenian or Spartan parents. However, the rules that governed the selection of public office holders were different in both city-states. In Athens, a person was eligible for public office if he was a free adult male from Athenian and Spartan parents, which was a very small pool of eligible candidates. Athens had a democratic government where decisions were made by the assembly, which consisted of all male citizens over the age of 18.