Invalid Tradition: The Horrors of The Town
In order for society to grow, members must be willing to do good for others, not only for themselves. The members that cause harm for their own personal benefit and have no regret, they are considered “evil.” When determining if someone is a villain, specific criterion must be determined. First, the number and type of people killed by the villain determines their evil. When the villain murders a large quantity of innocent people, such as children, who have done nothing wrong, they would be considered “evil” because those particular people did not ask for their deaths. Secondly, the method of murder is a big part on determining one’s “evil.” If one were to murder someone for their own personal pleasure,
…show more content…
Thirdly, the motive or justification that the villain shows has a huge factor on determining who is a villain. The most evil villains murder and harm people for no reason whatsoever. Finally, the villains presence of remorse can show how evil one is. The villains that show no remorse are the worst because this shows how they do not care for any of their victims. In the story, “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, the townspeople show that they are very evil because of the type, number, and method they use to kill and harm their victims. They introduce a lottery, however it is not what it seems and becomes a bloodbath for one unlucky member.The townspeople also show how evil they are from their motive and how they do not show any form of remorse. Instead, their sick beings, feel satisfaction as they kill their own people as tradition. The townspeople show that they are the most evil villains due to their intent to harm and …show more content…
To begin, the townspeople motive is basically how it is tradition to keep the town’s population lower in order to have enough supplies for everyone; however, if their population is already three hundred people, killing off one each year is not going to make a great deal of change. Also, none of the townspeople seem to show any signs of remorse as they kill one another with their rocks. Instead they get furious when one chooses not to conform to the other. This is shown when other members, including her husband yell foul things such as, “Be a good sport Tessie” or “Shut up Tessie” (Jackson 5). This shows that none of the members really care about the victims even if they are in their own families. Although some may think Montresor’s motive and remorse might prove that he is more evil, they are wrong. Montresor’s motive is that Fortunato insulted him one time so that means he must get revenge. However, as he is begging to brick him up in a wall and finds that Fortunato is most likely dead, he then feels the tiniest bit of remorse. He then acted as if it was only the dampness as he states, “My heart grew sick—on account of the dampness of the catacombs” (Poe 64). Thus, Montresor did show at least some type of remorse compared to the townspeople who totally fell into conformity. Though Montresor’s motive is not a smart of relevant motive, it is still not as irrelevant as
Montresor states, “I continued , as was my in to smile in his face and he did not perceive that my smile now was at the thought of his immolation” (Poe 1). Montresor devises an intricate and well thought out plan to murder someone he considers a friend, he highlights the evil of humanity when the thought of killing Fortunato brings a smile to his face.
With this in mind, I could connect with two people who also thought about how evil people can be. William Golding and Elie Wiesel wrote books that magnify the circumstances under which people act evil. Wiesel explores the conditions and the uncivil actions of the people in concentration camps during the Holocaust. Golding, too, takes a dive into the human capacity for evil in post-WWII times. Evil is causing harm to others that are unnecessary or over
The town doesn’t care who was picked they just want death to the person and everybody involved can take part. Old man Wagoner could believe that the lottery helps with crops. But for everybody else they just do it out of blindness and evilness. This town blindly follows these customs, not because it’s a tradition but because the lottery is so ingrained in their culture that they cannot let go of it, and they don’t view killing an innocent neighbor as wrong but just “another clear and sunny, with the fresh warmth of a full-summer
To explain, Montresor was insulted by Fortunato, the resolution to this conflict should have been as simple as confronting Fortunato with his hurt feelings. Instead, Montresor decides “[he] would be avenged” (Poe 543). Because of the dramatic way Montresor decides to resolve the conflict between himself and his friend, his character is shifted towards an unruly one. Montresor has no regards for those around him, he has no insight to anyone but himself. As a result of the way he chooses to resolve conflicts, he allows the conflicts to take control of his every action.
In the story “The Lottery” the villagers are evil because they don’t care about who they sacrifice they only care about themselves they’re selfish because if one of the selfish were to win the lottery they would have been begging for their lives. Keeping the lottery tradition is wrong because more and more people are going to keep on getting sacrificed. If they keep the tradition going they’re
•Montresor does fulfill this definition of revenge. He boasts about how it has been fifty years since his crime and nobody has “disturbed” the catacomb that he has enclosed Fortunato. Regarding the second part, it is questionable. The fact that he is still telling this story a half century later may suggest that he is obsessed (“overtaken”) with his crime. And the third part, he did make himself known to Fortunato because Fortunato cries “For the love of God, Montresor” as he is being enclosed in the catacomb wall.
Evil on the other hand it is seen as something associated with the devil. Serial killers take away and harm the innocent of our community .To see them as anything but evil will be nonsense. When we see interviews about serial killers ,we see how they had no remorse or feelings towards what they did. It confirms even more to us as a
The Lottery itself represents a primal example of loss of innocence; portrayed through the young boys who gather at the town square to collect rocks for the horrors soon to follow. An illustration of how traditions can lose their true meanings and come to represent violence and warfare. Furthermore, “The Lottery” also represents the decaying characteristics of traditions, as symbolized by the town’s black box, in this case where every year, someone’s name is drawn out of the black box and they are stoned to death, by other members who may or may not end up to be family. Nonetheless, it ends up to be the villagers who
As the name of the story implies, there is a ceremony called the Lottery. Every year in this village, there must have a person who is unlucky to be chosen as the “winner” and stoned to death by everyone in the village. The belief behind this ceremony is that if this happens every year, there will be a good harvest. The old and worn box for “lucky drawing” shows that this particular ceremony has been going on for many years now. So the faithful villagers are used to the violent murder without any doubts or eagerness to make a change.
In life, mostly everyone will want revenge on someone they know that did wrong to them. When Montressor wanted revenge, he went insane and planned to kill the person who did him wrong. In the real world, most people do not try to kill someone if they did them wrong. Montressor is insane because of the way he got revenge on Fortunato. Poe proves in this story that some people use different, harsher ways to get revenge on
Imagine a society where killing somebody for the sake of a tradition is acceptable. In the short story “The Lottery” Shirley Jackson describes an ordinary village with normal people, but as the story progress the details of their yearly practice known as “the lottery” unravels to be more disturbing. The author subverts the readers’ expiations by persuading the reader into assuming “the lottery” is a ordinary tradition until unusual details and the behavior of the characters come into place. In her short story “The Lottery,” Jackson seemingly uses ordinary details about the setting and the townspeople to characterize her theme that although society claims to be civilized, and may appear so, it is inherently barbaric.
One normally goes through many experiences which can lead them to do an action that may be considered evil. Doing evil and actually being labeled evil are two different things that can affect an individual's life
In this story, we observe how a character with such power and intelligence easily turns into a mad man who has devised a plan to murder an innocent man over a plebian conflict the two experienced. In one statement, Montresor says, “I must not only punish but punish with impunity” (Poe 1). In short, Montresor is implying that killing Fortunato is the fair thing to do and that he should be exempt from punishment for doing so. If I were to kill a classmate because he insulted me, I wouldn’t be exempt from punishment. Poe shows us that we can’t hold back our strange and uncivilized urges to get revenge on those who dishonor or hurt us.
Evil is unique to each individual, how people were raised and what they were exposed to will alter their definition of evil. However, people generally agree that homicide, rape, torture, genocide, and terrorism are all evil. Causing agony or suffering is considered evil. Manipulating the weak or manipulating children, in any way, is considered evil. Despite our societal understanding that these acts are evil and that evil is bad, we witness evil nearly every day.
Evil can come in many various forms such as actions, thought, ideas, nature, things, intentions, and people. Evil is an inevitable characteristic that exist in nature. Evil is important to define, because the definition of evil can set a society's values. Evil’s concept is defined by human societies.