Some would say a sport is something that challenges a person physically and mentally. The sole act to have fun or entertain. Most the time a sport includes two or more individuals or teams going against each other to win. Also most sports have a point system. Would hunting fall under the category of a sport? Some would argue that hunting is not ethical and should not be considered a sport. Hunting has been a part of life since the beginning of time. Hunting as sport is ethical because it does not violate any animal rights, while being an act of exercise and helping with population control.
Animal rights has become a controversial issues, because people are concerned with animal welfare, harm, suffering and death. What about a hunters rights?
…show more content…
There is so many issues that people want to argue today about deer hunting. Anti-hunters will argue that hunting is not a form of population control. They believe hunting some deer just increases the food population which will lead to more births of fawns. And without hunting food would be limited for the deer and that would cause less births. Deer is one of the more heavily hunted species, yet many wildlife managers in parks notice that even overpopulated areas have no problem. (Varner 108). Animal rights is also a big issue when talking with anti-hunters. Many find hunting to be unethical because the killing is more recreational today. Hunting is easier today then in prehistoric times. Some say hunting is lazy because hunters sit and wait on the animal to come to them. Also many think it is not necessary to kill an animal for food.
Society should promote hunting as a sport because of the number of advantages it offers. It offer cheap population control of whitetail deer, while encouraging healthy living and understanding of animal rights. People hunt for food and sport not because the deer need to be hunted. The argument whether hunting should be a sport or is ethical will never be agreed on. Killing a deer is as immoral as killing a cow no better or worse. Yet hunting draws more criticism from the public. Is killing a deer for food any different than the chicken or hamburger bought at the
Although hunting is part of cultures and they need it to survive, many people will say that hunting is not good because animals should survive. Another thing is that in the summer months people could get lots of food and take it with them. Those who believe animals should not be hunted think that animals are going extinct a lot more. Although aspects of this argument are enticing, it ultimately fails to be a stronger argument because if you are not hunting then you could die because of starvation. This is why cultures hunt because they need food and they use them as clothing to
How would you feel? I can live with hunting as a predator, hunt to eat, because one bear can actually last pretty long, but please don’t hunt because it is a sport. Second, 1. Support: If I remember correctly, before human come to Maine, Maine use to all be a forest.
Walking through the woods on a peaceful, fall day, I stumble onto a herd of cotton tails. BANG! THUD! Dinner is served. Hunting has been argued to not be the best method practiced for controlling whitetail deer populations.
Supporters claim that their sport helps conservation efforts and helps bring money to the communities in which they are hunting from. Opposers claim that occasionally there is a fine line between trophy hunting and poaching, because much of it is illegal. They also claim that only a small percent of the money made goes to help conservation efforts, and it causes a decrease in the wild life population. I consider myself as an opposer in most cases. I don’t believe it is our job to decide whether an animal should live or die, and I don’t see how killing an animal is supposed to help the population.
Pro-Hunting Argument To hunt or not to hunt, many see it as a negative and its being cruel to animals. Other think if humans keep hunting, animals are going to go extinct. But what many don’t know is how much hunting helps animals and the conservation of animals. People that don’t know what really is going on they always head toward the negative. I’m Going to explain how hunting helps wildlife and how Hunting permits are good because they help maintain animal conservation.
It's good for the species, if animals aren’t hunted they’ll die of starvation or disease when that food could have been used for meat on the table. It saves money by allowing you to harvest a animal and get about fifty pounds of meat, then buying that meat at the store. It’s also good for your family, hunting teaches the children, one of the greatest life lessons you can teach. There are a few better ways to spend quality time with your family than to take them away from their computer or tv and show them where their food comes from. Hunting is a sport, it challenges your brain and helps you vision when looking for movement.
Hunting has been a part of our society since the first man set foot on this continent, but animal rights movements have become popular in our society recently that has questioned the necessity of hunting in our modern times. Because of this, animal populations are left freely to where they can multiply at an alarming rate. Hunting is a great means of controlling animal populations’ growth, although greatly opposed by many. While hunting is a very controversial topic in our society, there are great points for being for and against it. Hunting is a way that humans see to keep balance of the ecosystem.
Everyday, the sun rises in the morning and sets at night, but the debate about hunting always remains on the table. Hunters see their killing of an animal as an achievement, they put food on their tables, or a mount on their wall. Critics see this as a cruel way for a human being to take the life of an innocent animal. In the article “Is hunting a moral? A philosopher unpacks the question” written by Joshua Duclos, examined the question of why people hunt.
Some may disagree that hunting’s purpose is to hunt the animals only and not to destroy their ecosystem which is true sometimes. They agree
Likewise, banning this hunt would eliminate the traditional ways of life set hundreds of years back to the rural inhabitants. For them , this hunt is a vital way to endure survival physically and economically. Finally, seal hunting is done in a humane, regulated manner despite much of the negative influence shown to mislead the public about this hunt. Many are not aware, but seals are overpopulated enough already.
Alongside to the economic benefits that meat brings into our society, meat industries also help people from the lower class. Without meat industries, people from the lower class would eventually starve out as their easy and cheap access to food would be taken away from them. Simply eating small grains and vegetables would no longer provide the same amount of nutrients in their diet as previously mentioned in the paragraph above. It is for this reason that eating meat is ethical as taking it away would cause detrimental effects to our
In addition, animals in nature die from a multitude of reasons and hunting is a better way of killing animals (Howard). Overpopulation causes a lack of food leading to animals starving, and animals suffer more this way than by getting shot. This situation can be prevented by having a set number of animals that can be shot every year and regulates the ecosystem. Furthermore, when an individual buys a hunting license the proceeds are returned to the states to support wildlife. Some of the money goes towards recruiting biologists, paying wardens, and maintain wildlife habitats (Howard).
“In 2016, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) estimated that Americans ate an average of 54.3 pounds of beef, 92.1 pounds of chicken, and 50.4 pounds of pork, per person, per year” (Vegetarianism). Food production counts for only one of the many injustices animals face daily. Although they have been proven emotionally intelligent, mankind views these entities as subservient and continue to harm them. People around the world have created organizations that work to ameliorate the treatment of animals. As the animal rights movement nobly fights to improve the conditions of these living creatures, daily human activities and the moral values of some prolong the acceptance of animal equality.
Hunting for meat is something that has been done since man was first created by God. The biggest problem that philosophers face when dealing with hunting being virtuous is the compassion involved within the kill of the animal. If the animals is shot or stabbed in a way that ensures a short quick death for the animal some would say this is a form of compassion that builds on the moral character of an individual. When you think about this method in perspective though, slaughterhouses and factory farmed animals are treated much more severely than hunted animals which then builds on the claim that hunting with compassion for a quick death is virtuous and ethical. A second example of hunting being morally permissible is when you play the game fair.
Intro Imagine that you’re in the woods with your family on a hike, when suddenly a deer comes out of nowhere with a gun. You stand in front of your family trying to protect them from the speedy bullets, your family gets away accept for the littlest one who falls behind and gets killed just as you did, animals lose their family like this everyday because of the vicious sport, hunting. Hunting is a controversial issue that has two very strong sides, but this essay is going to prove to you why the side against it is stronger. In the words of Paul Rodriguez “ Hunting is not a sport.