J. L. Mackie The Subjectivity Of Values
J. L. Mackie on his writing “The Subjectivity of Values” develops two main arguments against the objectivity of values. Mackie states, “There are no objective values” (pg.175) where he expresses his belief that there are no objective, absolute or universal moral truths and argues in favor of moral skepticism, the view that people cannot have knowledge about morality. While actions naturally can be perceived as morally good or bad, there is nothing that makes them objectively good or bad. Mackie presents two main arguments to corroborate his critique in morality. The argument from relativity in which he claims there are no objective values and the argument from queerness where objective values would be different from any other thing in the universe (pg. 174).
The Argument from Relativity is Mackie’s first criticism towards objective morality. His first observation is about differences in morals based upon culture. He claims how morality is better understood on a relative level. Instead of one culture being “correct” and the rest misinterpreting the moral principal, it is better to express that each culture receives their morals from different ways of life. “Disagreement about moral codes seems to reflect people’s adherence to and participation in different ways of life” (pg. 176). One culture should not be considered more moral than another, as well not to considered one correct or right over another one. This is almost similar to moral relativism, in which what is morally
Mackie's Arguments Against Ethical Objectivism
398 Words | 2 PagesMackie’s Arguments Against Ethical Objectivism According to the book The Fundamentals of Ethics, it is stated that ethical objectivism “is the view that moral standards are objectively correct and that some moral claims are objectively true” (Shafer-Landau, p. 294). It is the belief that each individual or person has their own set of moral principles. J.L Mackie explains two arguments against ethical objectivism, which include the argument from relativity and the argument from queerness. In addition he explains and defends his error theory.
The Importance Of Objectivism In Ayn Rand's Anthem
1162 Words | 5 PagesJudging the morals in life regarding different societies expectations quickly became the focus of Equality’s thoughts, exactly as Ayn Rand had made it the importance of her own efforts. Objectivism is different from what many people live by, but it worked for Equality by the end of Anthem. It is important to realize everybody needs different things, which leads to thinking diversely. Some need self-respect to be able to give respect, and others live their life following instead of leading. It is impossible however, to say objectivism needs to vanish when it never has before, more so, the world would be unbalanced with only equal thoughts from all; there would be no innovation if all thoughts were for the same narrow concept.
Mackie's Evil And Omnipotence
933 Words | 4 PagesThe question that is asked time and time again is whether or not god exists. It is evident that people hold different beliefs. It is evident that through some of the beliefs of J.L. Mackie that it could be argued that God does not actually exist. I find this argument to be more agreeable. In Mackie’s Evil and Omnipotence, he argues many points to support why it should be believed that god does not exist.
James Rachel's Argument Of Morality Is Not Relative
1070 Words | 5 PagesAlthough cultures throughout the world are distinct from one another, along with their own unique customs, there are set moral rules that every culture follows which plays a big role, in order for society to continue forward. Cultures are very different as described by James Rachels in “Morality Is Not Relative”. Cultural Relativism means that there are no set moral codes due to the fact that distinct cultures have distinct ideas when it comes to morals. For example, Rachel's supports his argument, by using multiple ways different people lived. Rachel’s points out a rarely discussed situation about Eskimos practicing infanticide.
Analysis Of Mackie's Argument From Queerness
1508 Words | 7 PagesMackie believes that there are no objective moral values, and to support his stand, he famously puts forth two arguments. The first argument is the Argument from Relativity or Disagreement, and the second is the Argument from Queerness. The focus of this essay will be on Mackie’s argument from queerness, and I seek to prove that his argument does not succeed in showing that there are no objective values. I will first be summarizing Mackie’s argument from queerness. Subsequently, I will proceed to form an argument on the first part of Mackie’s argument from queerness, the metaphysical component.
Fundamentals Of Ethics By Russ Shafer-Landeau: Chapter Analysis
1376 Words | 6 PagesThe final chapter, chapter 21, of Russ Shafer-Landau’s book, The Fundamentals of Ethics, emphasis is placed on the fact that moral objectivity is not always completely universal but does not mean the idea of moral objectivism has to be rejected. Moral objectivism states that moral standards should be universal but there are some circumstances and exceptions to this claim. Shafer-Landau presents eleven arguments in chapter 21 that some consider challenges to the universality principle of moral objectivity. Not only will moral objectivism be examined in this paper but also another philosophical view known as moral skepticism will be discussed. In addition to the arguments present by Shafter-Landau’s book this paper will include an analysis from
Arguments Against Cultural Relativism
1020 Words | 5 PagesEvery society has its own unique cultures in which people will have different ideas of moral codes. The diversity of these cultures cannot be said to be correct or incorrect. Every society has independent standards of ethic within their society and these standards are culture-bound. Cultural Relativism has a perception in which rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely within the bounds of the culture. This theory opposes the belief in the objectivity of moral truth.
Virtue Ethics: An Aristotelian Approach
2124 Words | 9 PagesVirtue ethics, primarily founded by Aristotle, was the dominant approach in Western moral philosophy until Enlightenment [1].Its importance re-emerged with the dissatisfaction associated with deontology and utilitarianism, two theories unable to address issues such as moral character, moral education, friendship etc. Virtue ethics emphasize moral character and virtues, focusing on three central concepts: virtue, practical wisdom and eudaimonia. Cultural Relativism is the view that holds that moral truths cannot be applied universally, and that each person should be morally assessed based on his culture/society. This paper discusses relativist objection faced by Aristotle, its arguments and the responses offered by Aristotle, in addition to anticipated objections and Nussbaum’s responses in her paper “Non-relative virtues: An Aristotelian Approach”
Deontology Vs Utilitarianism Essay
431 Words | 2 PagesIntroduction In this essay, I will be comparing Deontology to Utilitarianism. I will attempt to substantiate why I am justified in arguing that Deontology is a superior moral theory than Utilitarianism. A Discussion of the Main Elements of Utilitarianism Utilitarianism is a moral theory developed by English philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1947 – 1832) and refined by fellow countryman John Stuart Mill (1806 – 1873).
Thesis Statement: Origin Of Morality: Religion And Philosophy
1634 Words | 7 PagesThesis Statement: Origin of Morality Outline A.Universal Ethics 1.Karl Barth, The Command of God 2.Thomas Aquinas, The Natural Law 3.Thomas Hobbes, Natural Law and Natural Right 4.Immanuel Kant, The Categorical Imperative B.Morality and Practical Reason 1.Practical Reason a.Practical Reason and Practical Reasons C.Evolution of Morality 1.What makes Moral Creatures Moral 2.Explaining the Nature of Moral Judgments F. Answering Questions 1. What is the origin of Morality: Religion or Philosophy? 2. What does religion say about morality?
Cultural Relativism In Social Media
2321 Words | 10 PagesIn other words, “right” or “wrong” are culture specific, what is considered moral in one society may be considered immoral in another, and, since no universal standard of morality that exist, no one has the right to judge another societies custom (Ess, 2009). Cultural Relativism is closely related to ethical relativism, which views truth as variable and not absolute. What makes up right and wrong is determined solely by individual or the society (Ess, 2009). Since the truth is not object, there can be no standards which applies to all cultures.
The Pros And Cons Of Kant's Categorical Imperative
1222 Words | 5 PagesEthics and the search for a good moral foundation first drew me into the world of philosophy. It is agreed that the two most important Ethical views are from the world’s two most renowned ethical philosophers Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill. In this paper, I will explore be analyzing Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle and Kant’s Categorical Imperative. In particular, I want to discuss which principle provides a better guideline for making moral decisions. And which for practical purposes ought to be taught to individuals.
Ethical Relativism Strengths And Weaknesses Essay
2607 Words | 11 Pages(Luco, Week 3 Notes, p.9) Cultural Relativism is simply a combination of the following three theses: 1. The only criterion of moral truth or falsehood is the moral code of a cultural group. 2. A moral claim is true, relative to a culture’s moral code, if and only if the claim is generally accepted within that cultural
Moral Relativism
708 Words | 3 PagesMoral relativism “is the position that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect objective and/or universal
Hegel's Theory Of Morality
1742 Words | 7 PagesConsidered within morality, conscience lacks objective content, around which the determination of the truth or falsity of its believes could revolve. ‘Conscience is therefore subject to judgment as to its truth or falsity, and its appeal solely to itself is directly opposed to what it seeks to be – that is, the rule for a rational and universal mode of action which is valid in and for itself.’ Conscience is ready to mistake its subjective certainty – its being strongly convinced and hasting to conclude the truthfulness of its convictions – with objective certainty, where the certainty of the rightness of a principle is established on the basis of its correctness. Failure to distinguish where distinctions are due, the inflated subjectivity of moral reflection, reduces the morality of conscience to individual caprice, contingency of the particular will. Conscience is merely subjectivity’s absolute inward certainty of itself; that is: a certainty which amounts to nothing more than a pretence and fancy; a certainty which is no more than the self’s certainty of the self, with no bearing on actuality.
More about J. L. Mackie The Subjectivity Of Values
Mackie's Arguments Against Ethical Objectivism
398 Words | 2 PagesThe Importance Of Objectivism In Ayn Rand's Anthem
1162 Words | 5 PagesMackie's Evil And Omnipotence
933 Words | 4 PagesJames Rachel's Argument Of Morality Is Not Relative
1070 Words | 5 PagesAnalysis Of Mackie's Argument From Queerness
1508 Words | 7 PagesFundamentals Of Ethics By Russ Shafer-Landeau: Chapter Analysis
1376 Words | 6 PagesArguments Against Cultural Relativism
1020 Words | 5 PagesVirtue Ethics: An Aristotelian Approach
2124 Words | 9 PagesDeontology Vs Utilitarianism Essay
431 Words | 2 PagesThesis Statement: Origin Of Morality: Religion And Philosophy
1634 Words | 7 PagesCultural Relativism In Social Media
2321 Words | 10 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Kant's Categorical Imperative
1222 Words | 5 PagesEthical Relativism Strengths And Weaknesses Essay
2607 Words | 11 PagesMoral Relativism
708 Words | 3 PagesHegel's Theory Of Morality
1742 Words | 7 Pages