Throughout the course of the founding of America, the founding fathers had many disagreements. Luckily, with due time, many of these arguments were settled. For Americans today, it should be clear to see that Madison was wrong in his prediction of what a faction would be. However, Madison had a very good reason as to why he thought the government should prevent these from occurring. This short essay will help explain both sides of the story. First, let’s start with Madison. James Madison believed in having a very strong national government. Having a strong federal government allowed them to control almost every aspect of the nation. Any kind of threat to the national government was viewed as a very big problem. Because the government was just …show more content…
The founding fathers were still trying to figure out all the little details of setting the government up. To Madison, a faction was any group of people, united in beliefs, that would take away basic rights of others. Before starting, I’m sure Madison already had a full list of people and ideas that he thought may turn into a faction and threaten his government.
Now let’s take a look at what factions are like today. In my opinion, factions are very common. Factions, like many things, come in all different types. Some factions are super devoted to what they believe in, but others are very small, just hoping that what they have to say gets heard. Because our nation is so large, our government must also be large in order to control its citizens as much as possible. Individual states still have laws they can make on their own, but in general, a strong national government is important for the nation to survive and thrive.
…show more content…
The NRA constantly fights for more gun rights. They believe strongly in their ideas because of the second amendment. Another example is the Black Lives Matter group. Many members of this group believe strongly that the black society as a whole is mistreated by police and by people in general. They believe that they do not receive equal treatment, pay, or opportunities. This is an example of a faction that has gained a lot of popularity in recent times. The Black Lives Matter movement has gained a lot of media and news attention and seems to be progressing in what they hope to
James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.
Federalist Paper No. 10, which was written by James Madison, addresses the question of how to guard against factions. He defined “factions” as a group of citizens who are united and have a common interest that is dangerous to either the rights of other citizens, or the permanent and cumulative interests of the community. Madison argued that a strong, large republic would be a better guard against these dangers than a smaller republic. Both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by these factions. The most powerful faction will control the government and make decisions based not on the common good, but only to benefit them self.
But there essay were not really read then they are a widely read today. They were established to gain votes for a new constitution but it was also to inform the people of what would happen. Discuss Essay 10 In essay #10 Madison felt that there is no possible way to equally connect the states. He felt that everyone will follow their own crowd and want to do like people they feel are different.
The federalist papers was a series of newspaper essays that have become a classic of American political. James wants to redefine the term “Republic”. Power to govern must come from the govern’s citizens. James Madison starts the most popular federalist papers by saying that one of the strongest arguments is the fact that it establishes a government to be able to control the violence and damage caused by fractions which is a group of people who gather together to protect their political opinions and views. Factions will always be a issue to deal with because the citizens will always have different opinions, some own more land than others, and some are more wealthy than others.
Madison in #10 argues about factions and how not to worry about the government. The Constitution would limit possibly factions and destroy the country. On the other hand, Jefferson believed in a weak government and a strong federal state. Anti-Federalists
James Madison states that there are two methods of removing the causes of factions that exist. The first method is by “destroying the liberty” of individuals (Federalist #10). The second method to removing the causes of factions that Madison describes is by bestowing in every citizen identical “opinions, passions and interests” (Federalist #10), or essentially making every individual equal. James Madison explains that if these two methods of removing factions are used, then the basis of the American system, which emphasizes freedom and liberty, is breached.
After reading The Federalist Papers #10, 48, and 51 I believe that James Madison saw human nature as being selfish and self-centered, "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition" (319). Madison continues on to explicate on his previous thought, "It may be a reflection of human nature that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government" (319). The devices that he talks about are the checks and balances that Madison declares that the government needs. The government needs the checks and balances because Madison believes that trusting one man to govern everything just feeds the selfishness inside the chosen man, "If men were angels, no government would be necessary" (319).
James Madison’s writing of Federalist No. 10 examines the issues regarding the original Articles of Confederation, weighing and balancing the options of creating an effective government from a Federalist perspective. Madison’s attempt is to give the majority the power such as in a true democracy, though this raises the issue such that the majority may be in the wrong. In this, people of the minorities such as Madison himself being a wealthy citizen would need to “watch out” for the majority that they just gave the power to. Madison discussed how a republic system may be a solution to such a problem. He feels as if a republic would solve many of these solutions, yet cause more at the same time.
As stated in The Federalist No. 10, James Madison explains the arguments occurring between those who possess property of land and those who are not. The unfair distribution of property brings a conflict between classes, explaining a common cause of factions. In fact, the antagonism between the “creditors” and “debtors”, defined by James Madison, was impacted strongly by their opinions. Additionally, their opinion on certain topics such as religion and the Government are naturally influenced by their diversity. Therefore, different perceptions based on their “different degree of activity” plummet high into the category of creating their own distinguished groups of what they favor known as factions.
The Federalist No. 10” is a persuasive argument written by James Madison in an attempt to ratify the Constitution. He wrote a series of documents called the Federalist Papers under a pseudonym to convince others to approve of the Constitution. He says that factions are not good for America, neither is a pure democracy. Madison provides extensive arguments and remedies for the problems he is addressing. James Madison is attempting to ratify the Constitution by analyzing the way to deal with factions, comparing a republic to a democracy, and by comparing a small government to a large government.
Destroying liberty would be the first, “liberty is to faction, what air is to fire”-#10. However Madison understood that this was impossible to perform because liberty is what the people had recently fought for during the Revolution and the fact that it is essential to political life. The second would be the economic diversity. This is what complicates the people from sharing similar/same opinions. A man’s ability to do a certain job is what gets him income to, how much he works to build his assets is what separates people between classes, and he believed that inequality of property is a right that should be protected.
Madison spoke of things like paper money, even property division and abolishing debts. His voice was for the government we can recognize today that is designed to be an “extensive republic” for the
Madison’s essay reflects the fear many had of a tyrannical government and the desire to ensure that the country didn’t revert back to that which it had just escaped from. He notes the necessity to prevent any one faction or group from gaining too much power and oppressing those in the minority. The separation of powers was set in place to ensure that this could not happen. Even if one group decides they want something, the other two have the equal authority to prevent it should it not represent the country as a whole.
The Federalist #10 paper was the first contribution that James Madison did to the Federalist essays. His warnings and concerns were that the when a number of people rules whether it is by majority or minority, it can become dangerous to the republic. These people will ruled by their own interest not to all the citizens of the country. He described it as "faction". A faction is an organized group within a bigger one.
Madison expressed that it is impossible to destroy liberty because one cannot make everyone have the same ideologies, so it’s impossible to extinguish factions. Madison expressed that he preferred a small republic over a large republic. With a large republic a representative would have been picked by a big number of citizen in a large republic than in a small republic. In a small republic it would make it more challenging for ineligible candidates to gain a position in