ipl-logo

James Madison's Views On Social Responsibility

646 Words3 Pages

Social responsibility is the belief that people in society have a duty, or obligation, to make decisions that will help the society in a positive way, or make it excel. We can be socially responsible by giving to the community through things such as volunteering to do work or donating. Social responsibility is actively participating in the community on moral and ethical standards. When people are socially irresponsible, they are acting against the rest of society. Socially irresponsible groups are thinking about their own needs and desires instead of the needs and desires of the community. Socially irresponsible people and groups are typically a drain on society whereas the socially responsible are typically trying to better the community as a whole. …show more content…

He explains how you factions are groups of people who oppose government to act in their self-interest, and that removing the cause of them is impractical, but it is possible to control the effects. Madison discusses how, in a pure democracy, majority factions form and control the government even though it may not be in everyone’s best interest. He warns us of these dangers before explaining a solution. He says that the best type of government to guard against factions is a representative government. A representative government is beneficial because it allows the people to elect the few who will govern in the best interest of the people. He also explains that while this won’t stop factions from forming, it will create more factions that are small which removes the concern of majority factions taking

Show More
Related

  • Studied Criticisms Of James Madison's Federalist 10

    343 Words  | 2 Pages

    James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

    Read More

  • Analyzing James Madison's 'Federalist Paper Number 10'

    208 Words  | 1 Pages

    There are also many other reasons a faction may exist, as long as there is a common idea among a group of people there will be a faction. He believes in order to limit factions you must do it in one of two ways; by removing the cause or controlling the effect. Madison explains the only way to remove the cause is to take away liberties or have everyone think the same way, both of which are more dangerous than the faction themselves. Because removing the cause won’t work the only

    Read More

  • Federalist 10 Dbq

    243 Words  | 1 Pages

    Perhaps the most famous Federalist paper, Federalist 10, starts off by saying that one of the biggest arguments that favors the Constitution is that it creates a government suited to minimize the harm caused by factions. Faction, in this case, is defined as a group of people whether a minority or majority based on class, race, and profession that all share a common interest. It was inevitable that factions would occur and perhaps the defining characteristic was the unequal distribution of property. This would ultimately lead the poor without property to become the majority in a “tyranny of the masses.” Madison believed that there were two solutions in preventing majority factions, 1) Remover the causes, and 2) Control the effects.

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Federalist No. 10 James Madison

    944 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the Federalist no. 10 James Madison argues that the iniquity of the government by the people is its exposure to the issue caused by factions. Madison defines factions as any group of people that share the same views and opinions. These factions often assemble together causing violence and damage to secure personal economic investments and enforce their political views. Madison’s main concern with factions is that one might reduce the rights of another or effect the good of the whole in order to protect their own self-interest. When given the freedom to do so, these personal interest are usually at the price of another group.

    Read More

  • Review Of The Federalist Fallacy: Popular Authority Under Elite Rule

    1934 Words  | 8 Pages

    Madison rhapsodizes at length about the dangers of factionalism under majority rule; he claims that “popular government [...] enables [the majority] to sacrifice to its ruling passion or interest, both the public good and the rights of other citizens”, thus insinuating that popular rule in a system where “the causes of factionalism cannot be prevented” will ultimately devastate both the working class’s public good and the elite class’s private right (10). This fear mongering over majority rule acts as a ringing endorsement of the alternative: minority, or elite, political dominance. To ease the minds of his readers, Madison then declares that the working class of the new republic will be too spread out and otherwise divided to oppose the just government established by the upper class–or, in his words, lower classes will be “rendered, by their number and local situation, unable to concert and carry into effect schemes of oppression” against the elite (10). In this way, Madison promotes upper class rule as a means to protect American liberty, believing that the people at large were unfit to establish this protection themselves–and that they had neither the intelligence nor the unity to carry out their corrupt schemes under properly conducted elite

    Read More

  • Ratification Dbq Essay

    1265 Words  | 6 Pages

    Essentially, meaning that factions would naturally develop as men have differing opinions regarding such things as religion, politics, and attachment to different political leaders. However, Madison states that the most common source of factions was the unequal distribution of property. It is through this issue that Madison first raises the best way at limiting faction, starting with the flaws of a “pure democracy” (Johnson,

    Read More

  • 'The Federalist No. 10' By James Madison

    173 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the article “The Federalist No. 10” James Madison a faction is a group of citizens made up of people with the same interests and who don’t seem to care about the rights of other citizens. A lot of people weren’t agreeing when it was said that the United States would be too big to govern as a democracy causing there to be a large amount of factions. James Madison was aware there were a variety of factions, he showed that the democratic side using the majority rule would take down the factions resulting in making them come together to work as one, the republican side would allow the factions the necessary space for them to work together and get elected in the office. The minority groups would be protected because it would indicate the factions

    Read More

  • Give One Example Of Where Your Tax Dollars Go To Contribute To A Social Welfare Program

    979 Words  | 4 Pages

    This carries on from the belief that Americans have long valued hard work and self-sufficiency. However, social responsibility is also valued. The idea of social responsibility meant people are responsible for each other and therefore society should care for all. This is shown through Americans supporting the values of helping those in need, contributing to charity, being socially caring, and participating as a citizen. These ideas affect ideas about social policy in how we see social responsibility through helping the lower class financially but we still have to pay for our own health insurance.

    Read More

  • The Federalist No. 10 Argument

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    Madison is analyzing the way to deal with the growing faction problem. He begins his essay by defining factions for the reader. “By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of

    Read More

  • Factions And Federalist Essay No. 10

    562 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the case of taxation, the more powerful of the two parties would have the opportunity to impose higher taxes on the minority, thus, saving themselves money. Madison firmly believed that the constitution had the ability to solve the problems created by factions. Madison envisioned a large republic that would make it difficult for corrupt candidates to get elected. Madison expressed this by stating, In the next place, as each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens in the large than in the small republic, it will be more difficult for unworthy candidates to practice with success the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried; and the suffrages of the people being more free, will be more likely to centre in men who possess the most attractive merit and the most diffusive and established characters.

    Read More

  • Madison's Views On Faction Summary

    501 Words  | 3 Pages

    1.) What does Madison mean by the term “Faction”? What is a modern term we would use today? Madison uses the term faction to refer to groups of individuals arguing not for the rights or good of the community as a whole, but rather that which would benefit those who hold similar positions or interests. Different factions represent different ideas, leading to conflict and debate.

    Read More

  • How Did James Madison Influence The Role Of Government

    518 Words  | 3 Pages

    Madison described factions as a number of citizens “united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community. ”[1] In a society of majority rule minority factions are not seen as constitutionally dangerous, due to them lacking the means the legally acquire power. However, if a faction is deemed the majority then the very essence of freedom and government are threatened. Madison argued that factions are a product of prejudice and self- interests that stem from the nature of man.

    Read More

  • James Madison's 'Main Ideas In Federalist 10'

    1861 Words  | 8 Pages

    James Madison’s main ideas in Federalist 10 were about factions and how to remove the causes but also control the effects. He described a faction as “By a faction, I understand a number if citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community (“The Federalist #10).” Madison was correct in his statements about removing the causes and controlling the effects of factions. During the time Federalist 10 was written the Federalists were using the papers to help convince the states to ratify the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Comparing Federalist 10 And The Communist Manifesto

    830 Words  | 4 Pages

    Madison proposes that factions themselves are the staple chaos of the ideal government as the only way to eliminate factions is “by destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence” or “by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” He shows these solutions to be flawed as he thereafter notes that they are impractical and immoral. Marx, alternatively, has the staple chaos as the revolution of the proletariat to overthrow the bourgeoisie. He avoids acknowledging the problems and suffering that are associated with revolution and goes to great length to not label this as an “evil.” He paints revolution to be ideal and noble for the sake of his argument to convince the proletariat to

    Read More

  • Volkswagen Code Of Ethics Analysis

    1155 Words  | 5 Pages

    Davis (as cited by Khalidah, Zulkufly, & Lau, 2014) defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as “… the firm’s consideration of, and response to, issues beyond the narrow economic, technical, and legal requirements of the firm. It is the firm’s obligation to evaluate in its decision-making processes the effects of its decisions on the external social system in a manner that will accomplish social benefits along with the traditional economic gains, which the firm seeks. It means that social responsibility begins where the law ends. A firm is not being socially responsible if it merely complies with the minimum requirements of the law, because this is what any good citizen would do.” A firm will not survive without the support of both the stakeholders and shareholders, thus the CSR proposes the indication which stats that a firm can never exist In a vacuum (Khalidah et.

    Read More

More about James Madison's Views On Social Responsibility

Open Document