ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

1588 Words7 Pages

Introduction Sometimes it doesn’t matter how bad someone may be, they just have to be better than their competition. In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, the central conflict lies with Julius Caesar. People like Cassius viewed Julius as an up and coming tyrant so he wanted him dead. He convinced Brutus and few other to people help him kill Caesar. Antony, one of Caesar's closest friends then enacts revenge on the Conspirators. All of these characters had very unique qualities. Cassius was very manipulative and persuasive. Caesar was drunk on his own power and showed no fear. Antony showed loyalty, but it was blind loyalty. Brutus was the best choice for a leader because he was very smart, and showed great generosity.He also showed that he had great rhetorical skills. Brutus used these skills in order to persuade the audience to his cause. …show more content…

He mixes them in with some rhetorical question in his speech. For instance he states, “Who is/ here so base that would be a bondman? If any, speak, for him have/ I offended. Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman? If any,/ speak, for him have I offended. Who is here so vile that will not/ love his country? If any, speak, for him have I offended(lll.ii.25-29). At the start of each question he uses anaphora, which means to, “Repeat the same words at the beginning of a series of sentences or clauses”(Romm, 42). And at the end of each phrase he uses Epistrophe, which is “when many clauses have the same ending”. Both of these Devices allowed Brutus to connect to Pathos. Which is when they are able to engage the audience or reader emotionally in order to persuade the audience. By using pathos he was able to make the audience feel proud for being Roman. He made it clear that choosing Caesar would take away the freedoms of being Roman. Using the anaphora and epistrophe put a strong emphasis on Brutus’ main

Show More
Related

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

    792 Words  | 4 Pages

    Brutus begins his speech in Act III, scene ii, at Caesar's funeral, with an upset crowd questioning his motives for killing Caesar. The crowd’s initial reaction to Brutus is that he is honorable and venerated, but still needs to explain why Caesar was assassinated. Brutus tells the crowd that he did not kill Caesar because he didn’t care for him, but he killed Caesar because he loved Rome more. In addition, that if Caesar were still alive and king, all of the people would die slaves, and claims that he killed Caesar for the good of Rome. Brutus is able to persuade the crowd that he had honorable intentions for killing Caesar through the use of rhetoric-ethos, logos, and pathos.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

    602 Words  | 3 Pages

    Antony uses rhetorical questions to refute Brutus. How Antony does this is Antony uses his speech in which he spoke at Julius’s funeral to convince the people of Rome that Brutus is not good. Antony asked the people of Rome”What cause withholds you, then, to mourn for him?”(Act 3 sc.2). Antony uses this rhetorical question to make the crowd see Caesar’s death as a celebration not as Brutus would like to see it which is as a sad

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    502 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, both Brutus and Antony use ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the crowd to believe whether Caesar's death was the right or wrong thing to do. Throughout the play it is shown that Antony was the best persuader. He is a good persuader because he uses retained knowledge of Caesar to use in his speeches to make it seem he is a good guy and he is the right one to follow in leadership. Brutus uses ethos when persuading the people that Caesars death will benefit the city of Rome, by stating that everyone should know him for being an honorable man, "Believe me on my honor and keep my honor in mind …"

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar

    978 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar- Rhetorical Analysis In the novel, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, after Brutus brutally executes Caesar in Act 3 Scene 2, Antony is allowed to give a speech to the people of Rome whom have seen witnessed this fatal tragedy in Scene 3. Antony uses anaphora, connotative diction and details throughout his speech to persuade the Romans to change their perspective of Caesar and Brutus. The way Antony speaks about both Caesar & Brutus are a dispute of what he is actually trying to announce to the Romans. At the end of his speech, Antony hopes to reach the Romans emotionally (pathos) by enraging them against Brutus’s false statements against Caesar.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    779 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar was written about four hundred years ago. This story demonstrates the corruption of Roman government in 44 BC. Rhetoric and theatrics are the main tools that current politicians, and ancient politicians use to gain popularity, commandeer power, and make crucial relationships. Important Roman political figures such as Brutus, Cassius, Antony, and Caesar along with present-day politicians use these rhetorical methods to accomplish their goals. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare demonstrates how rhetoric and theatrics largely affect politics and political relationships.

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    833 Words  | 4 Pages

    In William Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar, Mark Antony uses rhetorical devices such as paralipsis, rhetorical questions, and verbal irony in his speech to the plebeians in order to plot them against the conspirators. During his speech to the plebians, Antony uses paralipsis in order to kindle curiosity and interest in the audience. Antony mentions to the plebians that he had Caesar’s will with him but tells them, “Have patience, gentle friends, I must not read it; It is not meet you know how much Caesar loved you” (3.2.152-153). By drawing attention to Caesar’s will, something Antony desperately wants to show the plebeians, but then dismissing the idea of reading it, Antony uses a type of verbal irony called paralipsis. Antony is aware that the contents

    Read More

  • Use Of Pathos In Julius Caesar

    671 Words  | 3 Pages

    Now the difference between the use of rhetorical questions in these speeches is that Antony's was used effectively, he worded it in such a way that stirred feelings as well as made them think. Brutus, on the other hand, only appealed to logic and talking to the citizens in such a way that almost offended them. Brutus says “Who is here so Vile that will not love his country?”. This is a rhetorical question that is weak because it is offending people in a way of making them feel bad if they don't love Rome with a burning passion. This isn't effective because the only thing this could do is make the romans feel as if they are being attacked.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Appeals In Brutus

    755 Words  | 4 Pages

    Brutus uses Pathos most out of all of the three Rhetorical appeals. He tries to use the crowds and the reader’s emotions to win their heart. As Brutus talks to the crowded they are very angry,so Brutus starts off by trying to cool them down. ”Be patient till the

    Read More

  • Ethos And Logos In Julius Caesar

    807 Words  | 4 Pages

    This appeals to the Plebeians emotion making them feel as if Brutus’ recognition of Caesar justifies his death. Last, Brutus uses logos to make the Plebeians question if they would “rather Caesar/ were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were/ dead, to live all freemen? (III.ii.22-24). This makes the Plebeians believe Brutus’ compassion towards the people made him kill Caesar. It justifies that Brutus only killed Caesar for the greater good of Rome.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Julius Caesar's Death Speeches

    620 Words  | 3 Pages

    Analysis Of Julius Caesar Funeral Death Speeches Julius Caesar was like a god to his people because he was the leader in Rome, and he influenced numerous individuals. People were shocked when Caesar was murdered by Bursitis because they lost their hero. During Caesar’s funeral, as described in Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar , there are two speeches given by Brutus and Anthony. Some of the rhetorical terms that are used in the death speeches are antithesis, metaphor, chiasmus, and alliteration which will be explained in the body of this essay.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Appeal In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    108 Words  | 1 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Antony uses the rhetorical appeal logos to persuade the Roman people to turn against the conspirators. At the beginning of Antony’s speech, he started off by giving examples of Caesar being a generous leader, so when the ‘poor cried’ out for help, Caesar cried along with them (91). Antony uses the rhetorical appeal logos when he said that Caesar ‘cried’ with the poor. He made an argument that Caesar caried about the Roman people and more deeply, since the conspirator said that they killed Caesar because he is ambitious, but Caesar caried about his countrymen which showed that the conspirators are not honorable.

    Read More

  • Why Is Brutus A Hero

    1071 Words  | 5 Pages

    Julius Caesar, is a play based on the true events that occurred in Roman history. The play follows the fictional lives of Caesar and his people leading up to, and after his assassination. Several characters can be labeled as both villainous and heroic at different points in the play due to their actions, however, this does not apply to the character of Marcus Junius Brutus, who remains a hero through the entire play. Brutus is a hero for several reasons, The first reason Brutus is considered to be a hero is because he continuously stands up for what he believes in. Secondly, it is clear that Brutus is a hero because he kills himself as a sacrifice to the roman public.

    Read More

  • Essay On Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar

    704 Words  | 3 Pages

    William Shakespeare, in his tragedy Julius Caesar, uses the rhetorical devices of a rhetorical question, repetition of the word ambitious, and direct reference in Antony 's speech to instigate the plebeians and persuade them to rebel against the conspirators. Antony pulls on the pathos, ethos, and logos of the audience to get them to exile the conspirators. Shakespeare uses a rhetorical question in Antony’s speech to get the plebeians to notice the wrongdoings of the conspirators and excite them to rebel. Antony discusses the money that Caesar left to the countrymen, and with sarcasm he states, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (3.2.99).

    Read More

  • Brutus Is A Tragic Hero In Julius Caesar

    756 Words  | 4 Pages

    He dies, and his death is a result of his own tragic flaws, which is his ignorance or willingness to trust people. Brutus is convinced that the death of Caesar will only benefit Rome, as he believes Caesar is not a good leader, is is starting to become a tyrant. Throughout the play, Brutus believes that him and Cassius on the same page, when really Cassius only wants Caesar dead out of spite and jealousy. Brutus is foolish to believe that the other men in Rome's government will simply step aside after Caesar is assassinated, when really these men are greedy and eager to take Caesar's power. Brutus was not only seen as a threat to these men, but he has also proved to be easily manipulated.

    Read More

  • Comparing Brutus And Cassius In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    525 Words  | 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar by Shakespeare is an elaborate play that dramatizes the events of Julius Caesar's assassination and the battle to control Rome that followed his death. It also shows how two characters that are both very important in the death of Julius Caesar, have very different morals and personalities. One of the most important parts in the play is the contrast of Brutus and Cassius. In Rome, Brutus is recognized as a noble minded man while Cassius has never been given any type of recognition.

    Read More

More about Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Open Document