War is a conflict that has been seen by every human civilization to some extent, and is sure to be seen by those in the future. These hostile situations can be caused by a variety of situations, including land, resources, philosophy, and religion. Though the exact cause and result of each war is different, there are ways to gauge the effectiveness and permissibility of the actions of governments and armed forces during war. This is the premise of Just War Theory. Just War is philosophy of rating a war as ethically just or not, which has three basic requirements along with a scale for comparison. A just war can can only begin to be considered soif the war itself was a last resort, waged by an actual authority, and was against a tangible wrongdoing. …show more content…
The discrimination fellow Americans faced in order to justify the war against the British inherently outweighs the need for war against Britain in the first place. History is written by the winners, and this case is no exception. So many loyalist people felt threatened during the revolution in America that when the British began to retreat their powers, many loyalists left with them, with up to tens of thousands emigrating from the Americas.3 Many African Americans, Dutch, and Germans also left in the exodus because they were more sure of their fates and status in the loyalist countries of Canada, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and England. Those that chose to stay experienced much worse a fate, especially in the South. Gangs violently attacked loyalist families after the revolution, and fighting still continued between loyalists and patriots in some places. Many of the bigger and more violent battles that occurred in the Southern colonies occurred after the Battle of Yorktown, and they are a subject history classes rarely consider, though it is a part that needs to be addressed. This hatred and discrimination furthers the immorality of the American Revolutionary
But is it enough? I also appreciate that through the years the just war theory has been expanded to include new parameters for methods and reasoning among other points (p. 143-4). But is it enough? 2) A major dilemma in war is the
The United States of America were formed from thirteen British Colonies. The Revolutionary War in 1776 was America’s declaration of independence but they were not completely recognized by all foreign powers. After America beat Great Britain there was tension and conflict between the two countries. This eventually resulted in war. Although there was no clear winner America did gain recognition from Great Britain and this war is often referred to as America’s second independence war.
“Somehow, even fifty years later, I keep thinking that there might have been another way, beside war, to achieve the same end” (Collier and Collier 211). In My Brother Sam is Dead, Collier and Collier describe how unfortunate it would have been to experience the anguish of the Revolutionary War. Not only did the war cause major conflict, it also tore families apart, caused a clash of generations, and demonstrated an example of principle versus reality. In My Brother Sam is Dead, although both sides of war are shown, authors Collier and Collier essentially argue that war is pointless.
The American Revolution ended on October 17, 1781, when General Cornwallis surrendered to General Washington after the Battle of Yorktown, (history.com, 2009). The American victory impacted the many groups of people who were involved in the war effort, including Loyalists, Native Americans, and African Americans. Two important documents that followed the end of the Revolutionary War, the Treaty of Paris, and the Northwest Ordinance, had a great impact on these groups as well. While the surrender at Yorktown largely stopped fighting between the British and the Americans, in the South, bands of loyalists fought gangs of Patriots, (npr.org, 2015). Much blood was shed, and many lives were lost, as the Loyalists, or Tories, still supported
The Americans stood their ground against the British loyalists, granted religious freedoms to citizens, and took a stand against the abusement of the government. The Americans were still at war with Britain for independence, but there were still loyalists among them. The Americans wanted the British loyalists out because they didn’t want them corrupting their freedom. “- Send them to the island of Britain; there let them drink the cup of slavery and eat the bread of bitterness all the days of their existence-”(Doc B). They took their stand against Britain by leaving, and did not allow any of them to remain in their independent society.
Britain's inability to establish authority over her colonies after the 7 Years War led the colonist to feel they were independent from British rule. When British government tried to reinstate British laws over the colonies, many citizens felt that it wasn’t fair. Many small events sparked multiple major causes that led America to want separate from Great Britain. Among those causes were protection of religious freedom, the taxes that resulted because of the French and Indian War, and Salutary Neglect. These causes led the Americans to victory after they entered the war because they understood the consequences if they didn’t win.
When talking about war, there are many books with few answers to what war truly is. Barbara Ehrenreich brings forth not only the possibilities towards understanding war but also the passion people from history have had towards it. One key issue she brings to light is humanities love for war, so much so that people would use excuses like holy wars to justify their need to fight in a war. She declares that war is as muddled as the issue of diseases and where diseases came from around 200 years ago. More so than that she even goes further on to state that these rituals that date back to prehistoric times are the cause of human nature during times of war rather than human instinct.
Several years ago, in speaking before an American Legion convention, the late Dr. Charles W. Mayo reiterated it with all the prestige of his professional authority and eminence as a famous physician and surgeon. It was therefore in his opinion absurd to imagine that it would ever be possible to abolish war. War, he said, is part of our human inheritance, and hence lies beyond our control. This point of view has a particularly strong appeal to the conservative type of mind. It is easy for conservative thinkers to believe that all institutions in human society are the outgrowth of the fundamental and unchangeable characteristics of human
Seeing how most of the descendants were from Britain, it makes sense these loyalists obeyed Britain and were afraid to veer off on a different path. The last factor ends with the French and Indian War. The Americans and the British teamed up together to fight the French. The land was too valuable, and if the French won, they would have lost valuable imports. After winning the French and Indian war, the two countries felt a sense of unitement.
What is the criteria for a Just War? The definition of Just War according to Dictionary.com would be, “A military action that is justified as being permissible for legal or moral reasons.” What justifies war permissible would be next thing to look at. Before going
Revolutionary War Essay By: Devin O’Neill I believe that the colonists should be held responsible for firing the first shot of the revolutionary war. I settled my opinion on this, because the colonists were the angriest prior to the battle between the two groups. The British had been dominating, and left the colonists to suffer. It gives the Colonists a reason to fire first.
War is complex and many people feel as though they have a strong grip on what it truly means and how everyone should feel about it. But, those people are just looking at it from one perspective, civilian, administrative, or a soldier. These three distinct points of view can change much of the way the nature of war is perceived and interpreted. The most common view from the administrative position is that war is a means to an end. It can accomplish what words cannot and has a definite winner and loser.
Andres Saeltzer Ms. Mclean English 9 Block E 27 March 2023 Lingering Effects of War “Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime.” — Ernest Hemingway, 1946 This quote is a very strong and meaningful quote. This quote really emphasizes that war is extremely unnecessary. No matter what, during war, there will always be death and violence that will negatively affect others.
Throughout Chapter five of her book Shadows of War, Carolyn Nordstrom shares her views on war in terms of social, physical and mental goals and punishes of such violence. To begin, one of the first goals of war as defined by Nordstrom is a direct result of a threat of loss of control. She explains that it is common for one military to feel the need to destroy another when their control over a certain (land area owned or controlled by someone) is under threat (56). An interesting point that Nordstrom makes is relating to/about (community of people/all good people in the world)'s do not tell the difference between the existence of different violences. As stated by Nordstrom, most people will naturally tell/show the difference between different wars; however, very few tell/show the difference between the experience of violence throughout such wars (57).
There are three parts of Just War theory, named different in English but common in Latin. “Just ad Bellum” part describes the conditions under which the use of military force is justified, “Jus in Bello” gives guidance how to conduct a war in an ethical manner and “Jus post Bellum” directs how to act in a transition to