The Keystone Pipeline System has been a major source of crude oil import for the U.S. in recent years. According to The New York Times, the Keystone alone supplies about a half million barrels of oil per day, which is almost a quarter of the total amount that Canada sends; Canada is the largest exporter of crude oil to the United States, supplying over 2 million barrels every day (Kraus; Keystone 293). The Keystone XL is one of the extension projects to boost the output of the existing system by building a pipeline that stretches over a thousand mile from “Alberta, Canada to Steel City, Nebraska, [and it is estimated to supply] 830,000 barrels a day” by converging with delivery points at Cushing, Oklahoma and Texas, then finally reaching …show more content…
oil industry by increasing supply and lowering the price, creating new jobs, developing pipeline infrastructure, etc., but most importantly, it will enhance U.S. energy security. Of course, there are many other pipeline systems around the country, including America’s own resources, which can take care of a considerable amount of its oil needs. The question is why only this Canadian pipeline construction would receive so much attention and criticisms, while the others didn’t, since building Keystone pipeline or extension pipeline is apparently not a new proposal. The answer could be that certain environmental externalities associated with the project needed to be addressed more carefully than other pipelines. However, there are several reasons why Keystone XL pipeline should be built, which essentially outweighs its projected environmental risks and spillovers to the nature and …show more content…
has been the argument that the pipeline will be built relatively close to some of the environmentally sensitive areas in the United States. In its environmental analysis, the State Department states that the pipeline will cross the Ogallala Aquifer which is the major source of groundwater that supplies over three quarters of the Nebraska community water needs and about a quarter of the water used in agriculture for the whole country. It also reports that over “200 public water supply wells are within [one] mile of the … centerline” (Environmental 300). Although the risk of spills and possible contamination of the water is hard to quantify, they can occur. The National Resources Defense Council claimed the Keystone XL operations will more likely involve accidents because oil sands have greater potential to cause corrosions to pipelines compared to other crudes. However, the U.S. Department of State argues that the crude oils that are going to be delivered by the Keystone XL pipeline is essentially the same in make up as the ones being supplied to America’s Gulf Coast refineries right now. It also mentions about then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s argument that either way, the U.S. will depend on “dirty oil from the Gulf or dirty oil from Canada ….” until the discovery of cleaner technologies becomes possible (Keystone 295). Furthermore, it is important to note that
The U.S. uses 25% to 30% of the oil produced in the world, yet has less than 3% of known oil reserves,” (Doc C Paragraph 3).This is important because if becoming self-sufficient is impossible than is drilling even worth
Canada should not allow The Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline to go through as it poses to many environmental and ecological risks. Pristine areas across central and northern BC, including the Great Bear Rainforest, are under threat if the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline is put into service. In the end, the concerns over the BC pipeline outweigh the possible benefits the pipeline may result in. The Canadian oil and gas company Enbridge, proposed the Northern Gateway project as a solution to transport 525,000 barrels of crude oil per day.
Initial federal permits, and partnership with affected tribes, were treated as a “check the box” exercise. Nowhere was there a careful analysis of how much the Missouri River crossing threatened water quality and tribal treaty rights. Nowhere was there a thoughtful public discussion of whether a new major oil pipeline should be placed in a river providing drinking water to 17 million people. And one had to pore over hundreds of pages of technical data to learn that the original route of the pipeline crossed the river just north of Bismarck, N.D. — a capital city that is nearly 90 percent white — and was moved to Standing Rock only when regulators expressed concern over the risk of a spill to the city’s water
The North Dakota Access Pipeline is a topic of controversy because it is economically beneficial for the oil and energy industry, but environmentalists claim that the construction and presence of this access pipe is damaging to the surrounding environment
Because of the price for gasoline has gone down, but if the U.S does not build the Keystone pipeline, the economic stability that it would provide will happen and thus will cause gas prices to rise. The Keystone alone will not pump in all the oil that would be need to support the U.S. However the Pipeline will add 9.4 million barrels of oil per day. When taken in for account the number of cars, planes, trucks; and other oil powered machinery that are in use in the U.S today, it would not equal up to what the U.S needs. 19.11 million barrels of oil used per day in the Americas
The environmental argument is coming from a clash over the fact they are basically stripping the canadian boreal forest, the path of the pipeline extends across major aquifers, and pipelines tend to leak and destroy surrounding environments. In addition ccording to The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions State, “epartment’s draft SEIS found that oil from the Canadian oil sands is 17 percent more carbon-intensive than the average oil consumed in the United States... It is estimated that the U.S. greenhouse gas footprint would increase by 3 million to 21 million metric tons per year, or around 0.04 percent to 0.3 percent of the 2010 levels, if Keystone is built. Fortunately on November 6, 2015, President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the Keystone Pipeline XL after 7 years of dispute. As mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, Obama stated “the project would not have lowered gas prices, improved energy security or made a meaningful long-term contribution to the economy
It’s important for the United States to produce and export oil because if we don’t, the Middle East and Russia will capitalize on the product and they will become stronger and richer countries. One of the ways that the United States can be an economically strong country is to reopen the Keystone pipeline and also allow states to have the power to generate their own oil. The opposition believes that pipelines have posed a huge risk to wildlife and the surrounding environment. The Key Stone pipeline has too many hurdles to go through; therefore, wildlife activists are against this project.
less damage in the pipeline can cause the environment to be clean and to allow the people not to be worried and to think that the pipe can transport the crude oil
During a Native Indian Education Association or NIEA Conference Dr. Daniel Wildcat states, “When the Pipeline breaks, it will be a disaster to Standing Rock Sioux tribe and to the people of the United States down the river.” The pipeline will break no matter how much try to prevent it, Dr. Wildcat said, “There a microorganism in the crude oil that eat steel so it's matter of when will it break.” Also was supported
With the increased scale of fracking in Texas, one might wonder if the oil boom is affecting our water supply. The value of water in Texas is deeply cherished considering Texas’s dry climate and long-standing droughts. One may even wonder if Texas is valuing its water as much as it is its oil. As research furthers, we can begin to weigh the positive and negative effects of oil fracking. By providing overwhelming data on oil fracking
“Benefits of Governmental Compromise Regarding the Dakota Access Pipeline” Nations all have unique governments and differences necessary for demonstrating successful leadership. Every country needs different assistance from their leadership, such as Rio requiring infrastructure or Somalia lacking political power. Some governments concern themselves with their politicians’ well-being more so than the people they lead, which creates a relevant problem in America. The United States Government can easily forget about Native American Reservations, or even ignore the people living on them. Recently, the United States Army Corps of Engineers has worked on the Dakota Access Pipeline project, which would cross over Native American ancestral lands,
Controversy Surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline To build or not to build, this choice will impact the relationship between the US and Canada and determine the level of dependence the US will have on countries that are not so friendly. “TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day” (Parfomak, Pirog, Luther and Vann 4). The construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline would strengthen the United States economy, provide energy security and have minimal environmental impact. “The Keystone XL project would create $1.1 trillion in private capital investment at no
TAPS transports 17% of the United State’s domestic petroleum. If the pipeline were to stop, “A loss of that production would increase prices by at least 10 to 16 percent” (Balan). This is very important, as the majority of the American population is in constant need of these resources. A shift this dramatic in the economy would lead to outrage and possible changes in economic inflation. All in all, the Trans Alaska pipeline has provided for a great number of people and has not failed to let them down.
Researchers have “requested data from Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, and Texas, all states heavily involved in the recent surge of oil and gas drilling, about complaints related to hydraulic fracking for oil and gas” for their research on fracking (Dechert). The research collected was shocking, over 2,000 complaints in Texas alone and several cases on well water contamination within the states mentioned in Decherd’s article. People need to be alerted about how real fracking is and the damages it is doing. These complaints and cases should be a wakeup call to the world and say that we should put it to a
While that may be the case fracking companies are recycling fracking fluid and using it in future