The 38 witnesses who did not do anything while Kitty Genovese was murdered is an ionic event in the history of helping research. The authors of this article (Manning , Levine, & Collins, 2007) use archived evidence to show that there was no proof that witnesses saw the crime or remained inactive, and also reports were taken from the witnesses that state one of the witnesses scared Moseley off, but later he returned and killed Kitty. Other witnesses stated that they tried calling the police station but couldn’t get in contact with them. This is why the authors do not agree that this event should be relivent with helping research. The article also gives a reasoning of why the witnesses stayed “inactive” during the cime which is known as the
Research will describe the gruesome crimes he committed as well as identify the deceased and traumatized victims. And finally, research will describe how the identification of this killer assisted many other forensic cases. Joseph James DeAngelo
Primarily, apart from the previously discussed issues regarding the evidence and technology used, the issues consisted of the fact that there was no body ever found, making it difficult to examine the exact circumstances of the crime and whether the crime occurred entirely, relying on a few bloodstains and unclear CCTV footage (as seen in Figure 3). In relation to this issue, another problem was the previously aforementioned heavy reliance on the eyewitness testimony of Joanne Lees. While crucial to the investigation, eyewitness testimonies may be subject to inconsistencies, memory lapses and potential bias, all of which were concerns during the trial. Finally, the high-profile nature of the case garnered widespread media attention. The extensive media coverage had the potential to influence public opinions which in turn may have impacted the trial
Imagine being interrogated about a mundane and orthodox day, one month ago, that you have little recollection of; this was the case with Adnan. Unable to provide sufficient evidence, and with the aid of Jay’s claim to being a witness of the murder, Adnan was arrested shortly
There were also a few persons of interest, who may have committed the crime either alone or with an accomplice. There were many things that that were discovered during the investigation, that will eventually lead to the cause of Anna’s death, although it is still unknown. Our findings from the gel electrophoresis, blood spattering, and persons of interest, all led us closer to finding the culprit of the whole mysterious death situation. For the DNA
In contrast, Eramo immediately took action in Jackie’s case and arranged meetings with the victim and the Charlottesville Police Department to make the rapist accountable for their actions. In result, Jackie did not want to cooperate with law enforcement in describing the rape or give any names of the men involved – which concluded to no official police report. ISSUE Eramo had to prove that the defendant’s, the Rolling Stone and Erdely’s information in the article was actual malice. COURT’S
Paragraph #3 In the book “In Search of Sacco and Vanzetti”, Susan Tejanda uses hundreds of sources trying to prove or disprove the innocence of both Sacco and Vanzetti in a robbery that involves murder at the Slater and Morrill shoe factory. Tejanda explains in great detail what happened in the court case involving Sacco and Vanzetti. Tejanda explains all of the evidence and stories that were used in court to pin this crime to Sacco and Vanzetti. She greatly explains both sides' arguments in the case with many different sources.
As with any criminal case, there are always a number of issues pertaining the stages of the crime and also the media and the general public’s opinion of the case. Many of the issues and explicit actions of certain individuals that had happened during the Corryn Rayney case had affected the interpretation of the case in someway for both government workers and the general public. By analysing the issues of the case, it allows a much more detailed view on the case and how most of the issues are linked in one way or another. One of the issues regarding this case was where a police officer had been found attempting to pressure forensic pathologists to alter their case reports to align with their best interests.
Scientific experts have been considered to provide impartial scientific evidence in contrast to most other types of evidence. But as illustrated by several examples like the misidentification of Brandon Mayfield in the Madrid Bomber case, it has been demonstrated that the forensic experts can be influenced by contextual bias. (Kassin, Dror & Kukucka, 2013) In Goodwin’s case there are several sources of error that due to a confirmation bias. The examiners were pre-armed with contextual information, they were aware that the target fingerprint belonged to an individual on the MI5 watch list, leading them to be suspicious of their target.
Those in charge of the proceedings discussed in Escaping Salem preferred relying on physical evidence in order to make their decision, such as markings from the devil (96). Although there were a plethora of accusations and suspicions, the court tended to ignore these, refusing to “send a suspect to the gallows based on circumstantial evidence” (118). This massive restraint
Then, the first-hand accounts of some of the 38 witnesses are added to show how they did hear and see everything, but still did not call the police. Finally, the author tells the readers that is only took the police two minutes to respond once they were called. The author does succeed in informing the audience of the events that took
Levine argued, that the `bystander effect` is a gerneral principle and it can not be applied on every real-life emergency.(Byford,p.235) To find out what the reasons where, in the murder case of James Bulger, why the bystanders didn 't step in he did a discourse analysis, in which he analyzed the testemonies of the trial. He tried to understand the witnesses responses. by putting them in the social and historical context. (Byford,p.235) James Bulger was just three years old when he was abducted and killed by two ten year old boys, Jon Venables and Robert Thompson.
The article provides a detailed account of the new evidence that was used to convict Feit, including DNA evidence that linked him to the crime and the testimony of a fellow priest who claimed that Feit had confessed to the murder. The article also delves into the larger issues surrounding the case, such as the Catholic Church's handling of sexual abuse allegations and the way in which the case was handled by the legal system. Colloff explains how the Catholic Church had covered up Feit's past history of violence against women, and how the legal system had failed to bring him to justice for decades. Throughout the article, Colloff also provides a glimpse into the life of Irene Garza and the impact her death had on her family and community. It is a tragic story of how a young woman's life was taken, and how her killer was able to evade justice for
Kitty Genovese Essay On March 13, 1964, Kitty Genovese was stabbed by Winston Moseley multiple times and died a little later. However, the crazy part of this murder is that 37 people saw or heard Kitty being murdered, yet they did nothing to attempt to save her. Police questioned the bystanders of their abnormal behavior, but they couldn’t respond. “37 Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police” and “The Kitty Genovese Murder: What Really Happened?” are two articles that discuss this bizarre incident.
People living in urban environments are less likely to help then those in rural environments (Last Name, Year). In the case of Kitty Genovese this was quite apparent as she was never offered direct help from bystanders overhearing or perhaps witnessing the event (Paciello, M., 2013). Urban people have a mutual understanding that they cannot help everyone all of the time. Along with that, urban environments provide immense distractions and haste that come with a constant motion of people coming and going which also provides greater diversity. People find it much more difficult to connect with others and empathizing is given at a lesser grade because of how unfamiliar and unrelated people are to one another on a daily basis.
Furthermore, there can be several factors at play when a wrongful conviction occurs and each case is unique. Three of the more common and detrimental factors that will be explored in this essay are eyewitness error, the use of jailhouse informants and professional and institutional misconduct. Firstly, eyewitness testimony can be a major contributor to a conviction and is an important factor in wrongful conviction (Campbell & Denov, 2016, p. 227). Witness recall and, frankly, the human emory are not as reliable as previously thought. In fact there has been much research showing the problems with eyewitness testimony such as suggestive police interviewing, unconscious transference, and malleability of confidence (Campbell & Denov, 2016, p.227).