Latin America had long been an obscure entity in the sphere of International Relations. However in the recent decades, particularly from the beginning of the twenty first century, we see many Latin American states asserting themselves in the international sphere in general and challenging the hegemony of United States in particular. Thus Latin America’s international relations promises to be an interesting study of a very promising region. The paper will underline three major reasons for the new developments in Latin American foreign policy. First is the economic rise of Latin American states. Second is the democratization of Latin American states, starting from 1980s. Third is the quest for autonomy that was quite widespread …show more content…
The process of democratization was in full swing in most Latin American countries. The economic rise of Latin American countries, once at the peripheries of world economic system, also made the world to take notice of this region. Vocal challenges to U.S hegemony in the domestic affairs and the region at large, also simultaneously emerged. Subsequently, successful regional co operational initiatives were also realized. All this has led to rise of the profile of Latin America in the world stage and also has given a unique identity to it in the international sphere, of late. Let us identify some major reasons behind …show more content…
They could be either radical left as in the case of ALBA member states – Venezuela, Bolivia and Peru or liberal left as in Brazil and Argentina. Many of these governments have fought poverty and inequality and addressed these issues attaining favorable results.
This has been possible only through democratization, which paved way for socialist parties that aimed at addressing the abject poverty and appalling inequality that was (and still is) conspicuous throughout Latin America. Thus the democratic governments rejected both the two main economic models followed in Latin America in its non democratic era : import substitution of bureaucratic authoritarian regimes as well as rabid marketization and neoliberalism of U.S supported regimes. Thus the newly democratic states elected parties that were of a pragmatic socialist bent, which struck a right balance between liberalization and welfare, thus lifting millions out of poverty, which is most exemplified in the case of Brazil and Mexicio. In case of radical left too, nationalization has helped distribute national wealth among the population, rather than be exploited by U.S based multinationals, as done by Venezuela under Hugo
The majority of countries set up relief programs and most underwent some sort of political upheaval, pushing them to the right. Many of the countries in Europe and Latin America that were democracies saw them overthrown by some form of dictatorship or authoritarian rule, most famously in Germany in 1933. The Dominion of Newfoundland gave up democracy voluntarily.
Actors and Processes; Comparison between Canada and Colombia Introduction The idea of globalization presumes integration and similar development for the whole world which in reality is a mirage. This is owing to very many differences among the over two hundred countries across the globe. These countries are sharply contrasting in almost all the spheres of life ranging from, their political systems, size of their economies, the demographics, social practices, cultural practices to governance structures. However, amidst these many differences there are certain common threads that cuts across all the countries in the world for instance however unique and different but each country has a political system that determines how the country is governed.
Braford E. Burns began writing The Poverty of Progress as a historical essay arguing against the “modernization” of nineteenth century Latin America. Burns argues that modernization was preformed against the will of the majority and benefited a small group of Creole Elite, while causing an exponential drop in the quality of life for folk majority. Burns supports his research through a series of dichotomies. Within the first twenty years of the nineteenth century the majority of Latin America gained independence from Spain.
Multiple sources declare many different factors to have served as causes to the Nicaraguan revolution. For instance, the website Inventory of Conflict and Environment (ICE), Nicaraguan Civil War discusses that the poverty and environmental issues of Nicaragua during the Somoza dictatorship were the primary causes as well as results of the Nicaraguan Revolution. Other sources present other factors as causes, such as funding from the Cuban Revolution, the leftist Panamanian government, and the Venezuelan government (Uppsala Conflict), who greatly opposed the Somozas thus forming together the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN) (Appendix A) or Marxism as the cause, considering it “supports every gain and step forward taken by the exploited
In 1929 The League of United Latin American Citizen or LULAC was founded in Corpus Christi, TX. It is the most respected and oldest surviving civil rights organization for Hispanics in the United States. The League of United Latin American Citizen was established to empower its members to develop opportunities they needed due to the rise of the Texas middle class. During the time LULAC was created Hispanics were being denied human and civil rights, even thought they had made plenty of contributions to Americas society. Its founders were concerned with discrimination against Mexican Americas, with a main concentration on public education.
In the twentieth century, America focused on responding to problems that emerged during the transformation from a rural agriculture society into an urban industrial one. A theme that sparked all Progressive reform was to use government for social welfare, rather than letting issues cure on their own. During this era, each state served as laboratories for democracy. By using government as an agent, reformers attacked child labor, corporate corruption, poverty, etc. Reformers attacked child labor, corporate corruption, over working etc.
It should be noted however that while many South American liberals were hypocritical, José Vasconcelos was Mexican and the Mexican Revolution was a conservative revolution and many of the Mexican elite unlike their further southern counterparts claimed to be conservative. This more points to the complicated politics of Latin America at the time of independence where lofty ideals often took a backseat to hard economics and power. For example during the neocolonial era, many of these governments came to power as liberals but their policies hurt the poor agrarian farmers much more than during the colonial era or the postcolonial era when conservatives mainly held power. This elite hypocrisy can be traced to wanting to maintain control of the economics and the desire to become more civilized, or create a more civilized nation. To do this, Latin American elites turned to Europe, to adopt European ideology.
A quote which describes this best is one by Uruguayan journalist Eduardo Galeano “Latin America is the region of open veins. Everything, from the discovery until our times, has always been transmuted into European— or later United States— capital, and as such has accumulated in distant centers of power. Everything: the soil, its fruits and its mineral-rich depths, the people and their capacity to work and to consume, natural resources and human resources” (Galeano,
Neoliberalism and its implementation has had a major economic and cultural impact on countries in South America of which Chile being the most prominent example. From the beginning, neoliberalism was a project that was to restore the class power where the economic elites are in control. The theoretical utopianism of the neoliberal argument was primarily used as a method to justify the actions of General Augusto Pinochet’s militant rule where basic human rights were continuously violated. The basis of neoliberalism was deregulation and privatization of various sectors in a free market economy, however the consequences of these policies caused for many years of human rights violations under the rule of General Pinochet. The memories and the historical
The Catholic Church and Latin America The Catholic Church was a great power ruling many civilizations in Europe during the period between 1492 and 1830. Therefore, the role of the Catholic Church was of utmost importance to the colonization and development of Latin America as it was a great force in Spain and Portugal. Despite the peaceful teachings of the Church, greed and a hunger for power led them to make decisions harming Latin America and Christianity, rather than thriving it. In this paper, I will show that the Catholic Church is significantly responsible for the colonization and development of Latin America through, the Christianizing mission, the Treaty of Tordesillas, and the Spanish Inquisition.
Mexico and Cuba underwent major revolutions led by rebels who opposed their current presidents. The revolutionaries in both countries were mainly concerned with the industrialization and modernization that was occurring within their countries. The uprisings resulted in the countries shared beliefs against foreign imperialism, against elites having so much control on their counties and push for land reforms. In the long run Mexico faired better after their revolution than Cuba. Cuba still experiences hostile tensions with the U.S. today and still practices rationing.
Many of the more unrealistic parts of the essay can be seen as less of the ideological musings of one man and his hope for a united future and more the reflection of a colonial and racially charged violent past, disunity of Latin America and failure of Simon Bolivar's dreams, and the corrupt rule of the
President Maduro has followed in Chavez’s footsteps and continued to run the country under a socialist party. There are many forms of socialism and not all of them hold the same goals but essentially socialism is an economic and political system. The common factors that all forms of socialism share is the concept of social ownership, otherwise referred to as common ownership. Venezuela operates under democratic socialism this means that the factors of production are equally owned by everyone in the society instead of any one individual or by the government. Since all capital is owned by the government the questions of what to produce, how to produce and for whom to produce are decided politically and then implemented by the government.
After Spain and Portugal defeated Napoleon in 1815, they made arduous efforts to reclaim their former colonies in Latin America. There was increased concern in the
(1959) argued that, the study of international relations in the newly founded Soviet Union and later in communist China was stultified by officially imposed Marxist ideology, in the West the field flourished as the result of a number of factors: a growing demand to find less-dangerous and more-effective means of conducting relations between peoples, societies, governments, and economies; a surge of writing and research inspired by the belief that systematic observation and inquiry could dispel ignorance and serve human betterment; and the popularization of political affairs, including foreign affairs. Edward H. (1939) argued that, the international relations among other roles also it promotes the improvement of global economic governance and cooperation among emerging markets. The countries raise the voice and representativeness of developing countries in global economic