On November 8, 2016, any United States citizen born between 1995 and 1998 will be able to vote for the first time in the upcoming Presidential election. I am currently nineteen years old—old enough to vote, but not necessarily compelled enough to care. According to society, my disinterest in politics is “characteristic” of my generation, the Millennials. Lately, I’ve questioned what it is about my generation and our perception of politics that makes many young people my age claim they “just don’t care.” Recently, as a copywriter in Boston University’s AdLab, I was assigned to create advertising for the League of Women Voters of Massachusetts. The non-partisan political organization works to educate citizens about politics and encourage voters …show more content…
People pick sides on issues, and many don’t hesitate to vocalize their opinions. But when it comes to physically implementing change, many supporters fall by the wayside, especially if a large community of people with the same views doesn’t already exist. People fear standing alone, and so it seems easier to be silent than suffer the backlash that comes with having an opinion. In the case of the League of Women Voters, the issue may not stem from the organization’s efforts, but rather, from its name. Formed in the early 20th century, the organization was named when women were first given the right to vote. The name has nothing to do with supporting modern issues that affect women, which is why it should be changed. A woman’s ability to vote is no longer an issue, but women’s equal rights are. If the League of Women Voters has no plans of emphasizing the importance of women’s issues in politics, it should remove the word “women” from its …show more content…
No one without a racist agenda refers to the black community as “colored people” anymore. As issues change with time, so should the organizations’ titles that are geared towards solving them. The title “ The League of Women Voters” depicts an organization different from the one that actually exists. In advertising, we refer to this as “branding” and the League of Women Voters is simply not living up to the “brand name” as an organization. Change the name or change the mission. Don’t look like you’re fighting for the political voice of women when in reality, you’re just a passive
Implementing and Sustaining Social Movements The League of Women Voters was founded in February 1920, which gave women the right to vote. Shortly after its founding it began expanding to areas civil and human rights and world peace (League of Women Voters, n.d.). Throughout the years the league continued to expand, supporting equal rights for all; in education, housing, and employment. They also focused on issues such as clean-air, alternative transportation, and waste-oil recycling (Loeb, 2010).
In the Progressive Era, ‘women reformers did not have faith in the traditional biased government. The women reform group adopted new political techniques. There techniques included marching, and demonstrating as unbiased pressure groups’. (Goldfield, ed., The American Journey: A History of the United State, pgs.
As the elected president of NAWSA, Catt started to establish an international woman suffrage organization in February 1902 known as International Woman Suffrage Alliance (IWSA). Several foreign countries of woman suffrage societies were represented such as Australia, Denmark, Germany, Great Britain, Norway, Sweden, and the United States influencing the cause around the world. In 1915, Catt set a meeting with presidents of the state suffrage associations and arranged a strategical approach of the organization’s purpose. The central intentions to attain the federal suffrage amendment must be done by pursuing the four planned goals part of the “Winning Plan.” First goal to the strategy was to receive resolutions from each state legislature to
In the years of this new century, the country has not had such a great chance to fix problems that we all face, except for now, as a result of the financial gift you have given. Through your generosity, I know that you will be able to give a helping hand to the people that will be affected by these reforms so that they may have a better quality of life. This winter of 1913 in the United States had made me think of all the people that need help and to have equal rights. Having equal rights and fixing the broken cracks of society is a very important responsibility to help those less fortunate than us, isn’t it Aunt Bessie? With the million dollars you have given to me, I will help others who do not have as good of an opportunity by distributing
Throughout the 20th century many avenues of society were forever changed thanks to advocacy groups. Inequalities have been corrected, policies and laws have been changed, and the sexism intertwined throughout culture, social structures and in everyday life is no longer seen as acceptable. Many groups especially women’s advocacy groups in Canada, have achieved this positive change. The “Quiet Revolution” was the advocacy for women’s rights which took place in Quebec from the mid 1950s to the late 1960s (Gosselin, 2006). Although they did not identify as feminists, women’s groups in Quebec demanded and advocated for equal rights and the inclusion of women in the political sphere giving women a voice within government “to oppose the sexism of
(Dubois, 189) For instance, African American women also began their suffrage by forming the National Association of Colored Women in 1903. " …with links to the Democratic Party and the labor movement, A Women's Henry George Society, and a female wing of William Randolph Hearst's Independence League." (Dubois 189) This quote presents several of representatives that women had done to the whole
Formed in 1866 to prevent from larger conflicts. we deserve to be distinguished for all we help men accomplish. organized to advocate and defend the debate of women voting for laws of those we give life. all men are given a chance to make thoughts and opinions heard.
The passage of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, although riddled with ironies, was crucial in legitimizing the legal feminist strategy. The main paradox of Title VII was the amendment that include the word “sex” into the bill’s language, was offered by Rep. Howard Smith, an anti-civil rights democrat from Virginia (Freeman, “How ‘Sex’ Got into Title VII”). Therefore, the language of Title VII made it unlawful for employers to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, and nation origin. Rep. Smith’s plan to kill the bill by attaching the “sex” discrimination language backfired in a major way.
(Dubois, 189) For instance, African American women also began their suffrage by forming the National Association of Colored Women in 1903. " …with links to the Democratic Party and the labor movement, A Women 's Henry George Society, and a female wing of William Randolph Hearst 's Independence League." (Dubois 189) This quote presents several of representatives that women had done to the whole society.
Equality has been a problem in many nations for centuries. Since the start of time, it has been believed that men are far more superior to women and that the rights of women should be limited. In many countries today, it is the social norm for women to have limited rights including the right to voice their opinions. All around the world women have had no say in who runs their country, or in decisions that affect them. The United States had this same problem until women stood up and fought for their right to vote.
Women’s suffrage Have you ever thought about women 's rights and equality? It’s not as pretty or memorable as you think it is. But just like Shirley Chisholm said “at present, our country need’s womens idealism and determination, perhaps more in politics than anywhere else.” Which is true but back then it certainly wasn’t. Let me take you way back to when women and men were not equal, and when men had more power over women.
It is clear that American voters tend to avoid local elections and off-year elections. Run-off elections are also likely to register lower voter turnout as compared to first-round elections. The larger the gap between first round elections and run-off elections, the higher the decline in voter turnout. Moreover, there are lower percentages of young people voting as compared to the older population. This is an important point to note since it highlights that young people do not have information guiding them on the importance of voting.
Susan B. Anthony, a woman who was arrested for illegally voting in the president election of 1872, in her “On Women's Right to Vote” speech, argues that women deserve to be treated as citizens of America and be able to vote and have all the rights that white males in America have. She begins by introducing her purpose, then provides evidence of how women are citizens of America, not just males by using the preamble of the Constitution, then goes on about the how this problem has became a big problem and occurs in every home in the nation, and finally states that women deserve rights because the discrimination against them is not valid because the laws and constitutions give rights to every CITIZEN in America. Anthony purpose is to make the woman of America realize that the treatment and limitations that hold them back are not correct because they are citizens and they deserve to be treated like one. She adopts a expressive and confident tone to encourage and light the hearts of American woman. To make her speech effective, she incorporates ethos in her speech to support her claims and reasons.
Women are more likely to fight against the men or against other women because they want to identify with what the other deny them (Melucci, 1996). In other words, women and girls are more likely to continue to fight and pursue jobs of power in order to be identified as powerful, accomplished, strong women, which is what they are denied by other people. However, in order for that to happen we need to be recognized by others in order to confirm and determine who we are. Along with identity, collective identity is another tactic used in the film. Seen in the documentary there is a collective interest of feminists to prevent the objectification of women.
Thank you, Millicent Fawcett, for giving me the opportunity to speak on behalf of the National Union of Women 's Suffrage Societies which Millicent leads with grace and dignity. Some of you may know me and some of you may not, but I am Clementine Forest one of 3000 women suffragists who has marched here today, the largest march ever occurred, for the cause of women 's suffrage. I am here to represent and express the importance of women receiving the right to vote. Unfortunately, the London weather wasn 't on our side with the presence of heavy rain throughout our march from Hyde Park to Exter Hall, but this reinforces that nothing will stop women from protesting their right to vote. As you know we have been gathered together as one, today on February 9th, 1907, the day in which Parliament is open once again for the coming year.