Over the course of the semester we have discussed the absence of great literature coming from the Civil War period. During, the discussion at the beginning of the course I agreed with the sentiment that there was very little in long-lasting literature produced in the war period. I thought that this was likely, because the war was too difficult to talk about in a comprehensive way for those that experienced it firsthand. In the time since we have seen great documentation of the Civil War by historians, authors, and filmmakers. For example, the movie Lincoln was nominated for twelve Academy Awards. Nonetheless, most of the notable books and films have been created by taking a taking a conglomeration of war-era writings and translating them into …show more content…
Does the dramatizing of Hollywood destroy the historical relevance of film? I would argue no. I think a movie like Lincoln that is mostly accurate, but had a few instances of dramatization is a good example of why it is important to still value imperfect historical depictions. Numerous people went to see the movie Lincoln and the picture received critical acclaim. The movie was informative and helped causal viewers gain a greater sense of appreciation for the sixteenth President and those who fought for the 13th Amendment despite not being one-hundred percent accurate. Ultimately, the film has a greater societal impact than a truthful undramatized documentary that receives little viewership. The advantages of film is the potential to reach a large audience and inform the public about history that might have been lost if not for a great dramatization. The most popular civil war film (and maybe film in general) of all time is Gone with the Wind. The movie is not rooted deeply in facts, nor provides an accurate and detailed historical narration. In this sense film is limited by its desperate need to reach a wide audience. If anything Gone with the Wind (film) might tell us more about the era the movie was released, then the era it depicts. Therefore, the desire to reach a large audience is both the appeal and drawback of
In 1961 Robert Penn Warren work a book titled The Legacy of the Civil War. This book of his was published by Bison Books. Warren’s Legacy of the Civil War consisted of exactly 109 pages, plus some extra blank pages for notes. This book may seem a bit short for a history subject, but it is packed with lots of information to offer to a researcher or a history enthusiast.
Another historical significance about this book is to educate young people about the importance of what the men on both sides of the war were fighting for. As citizens of America the contents of the book are important to know. The people who fought for what is right should never be forgotten and truly did this country a great service as stated in the in the book Killing Lincoln, “But the war is not so easily forgotten by others. Unbeknownst to all those men who risked their lives to fight those great battles—men who deservedly savor the
Innately people can be selfish, so in times when not only their own livelihood is in danger, but the lives of thousands is when a spotlight illuminates from the writer’s pen of Shelby Foote. The Civil War was not fought by superheroes, but by soldiers and he makes this clear. Foote shows us that being heroic can only be in instances and gives cases where soldiers were unheroic to paint the entire picture for readers to make their own conclusions. Dramatic irony is drawn from his toolbox to further drive home this point. Shakespearean moments that Foote could not even dream of are included for both the pleasure in telling the story and telling more about the war itself, even more specifically the Seven Days Battles.
While he writes about the events after they happened, his experience and detail involved in the book make up that. This book provides a greater understanding of the civil war from a side that is not usually written about. Overall, understanding of the civil war is expanded after reading this book. So it stands not just as a good source for information but also a primary source because of the author’s perspective. The confederate side of the story is silenced often because they lost.
The United States Civil War is possible one of the most meaningful, bloodstained and controversial war fought in American history. Northern Americans against Southern Americans fought against one another for a variety of motives. These motives aroused from a wide range of ideologies that stirred around the states. In James M. McPherson’s What they fought for: 1861-1865, he analyzes the Union and Confederate soldier’s morale and ideological components through the letters they wrote to love ones while at war. While, John WhiteClay Chambers and G. Kurt Piehler depict Civil War soldiers through their letters detailing the agonizing battles of war in Major Problems in American Military History.
Despite the many years after the Civil War ended in 1865, the war’s significance was still great enough to have caused such controversy with the public over its meaning. In David W. Blight’s Race and Reunion, the meaning of the war changes throughout the period of Reconstruction not due to the misconception of it solely, but due to what we wanted to interpret from the war (or rather, what we remembered from the war that eventually changed over time). Blight argues, “I am primarily concerned with the ways that contending memories clashed or intermingled in public memory, and not in developing professional historiography of the Civil War” (Blight, Prologue). With this being said, the meaning of the Civil War changed through what people felt and
The Civil War was a big part of history having over 620,000 deaths. In this essay I am going to be talking of 3 of the battles of the civil war and the movie Glory along with 6 of the main characters and the 3 that impacted me the most. The civil war had 50 major battles but for this essay I'm going to be talking about 3 of them. In this case it'll be Gettysburg, Vicksburg, and Antietam.
Prior to the civil war american s had illusions of innocence and isolation from the forces of history. After studying literature from the period known as realism, we know that these writers used their words to portray realistically america’s various social issues and struggles such as states rights, slavery, and death. These writers portrayed social issues and the struggles of ordinary people. No longer did the literature contain the supernatural of the romantic period. On the contrary, works such as “Follow the Drinking Gourd”, “War is Kind” and “ Letter to Son” changed america’s idea of innocence and isolation from the horrors of history because the civil war was the only war where every death was American.
Accessed 10 Jan. 2018. Hollar, Sherman. Biographies of the Civil War and Reconstruction: Abraham Lincoln, Robert E. Lee, Ulysses S. Grant, and More. Chicago, Britannica Educational Pub., 2013. Holzer, Harold.
He teaches the reader about a couple of the most important battles and generals of the civil war. Instead of being a plain research book about the civil war, he gives us accounts of true yet hilarious events during the civil war, such as a soldier rushing into battle with half of his hair shaved because he couldn’t finish his haircut. Or even about the time opposing soldiers did not fight and instead met at a river to trade goods like newspaper, tobacco, and card in makeshift boats. Steve Sheinkin explains the Civil war in simple, perhaps oversimplified tales and fact. This, however, does not take away the depth of the book, fully going into slavery and the impact of cotton, he does his part in explaining the Civil War.
The Abolitionists Growing up as a Christian I never could understand how people claimed to be saved or god’s servant but yet can discriminate against skin color. I was taught God is of love regardless of skin color, size or how the person looks. Such as Caucasians with African Americans and even so how could they attend church but yet have slave servants in their home? As shown in the documentary most of the film was a conflict about slavery and the few whites that was against it. Such as “Angelina Grimké” a Caucasians female Christian who despised slavery and watch her parents live with it with no moral or self-respected.
Not many believed that The Civil War would be more deadly than all the world wars put together. After The First Battle of Bull Run, in the summer of 1861, things became serious and the U.S was about to experience the deadliest war in U.S history. “This Republic of Suffering” goes deep into the effect of the Civil War on the soldiers and their families. The author Drew Gilpin Faust wanted to show the world a side of the war that Americans have never seen in details. Faust showed the death of the soldiers, and the effect that the war had in their families, appealing to the emotions of the readers.
Tony Howritz seeks to find out why the Civil War still captivates Americans today. From a young age Horwitz is educated about the Civil War from his 101
In the film 12 Years a Slave the editor, Joe Walker, makes use of a couple of techniques and styles that adds to the film in its own way. Long shots – Joe kept the long shots as long as he thought was necessary to add to the subject matter and the feeling he wanted to bind with the story. At the end of the film there’s this extremely long shot where Solomon is practically staring at the camera for about a minute and a half. The timing of that shot is so perfect because it’s not too short so you don’t have enough time to think about what just happened or too much time to overthink the situation. Closer to the end of the shot he lets the sound fade slowly and rapidly gives you a wakeup call when the next shot starts off where Solomon and the rest of the slaves are busy working in the field.
“It’s nothing but a sentimental piece of tripe,” said one of his company’s story editors. His close friend called it “a story of a bitch and a bastard, no one’s going to be interested in that.” The first scenes of the film were shot without casting the lead role, more than half the cast didn’t want to play their respected characters, three directors, several screenwriters, fifty speaking roles, two thousand four hundred extras, several off screen dramas between cast and crew, on the brink of the second World War, and yet despite it all, producer David O. Selznick of Selznick International Pictures pulled it off. He successfully produced the highest grossing film of all time, “Gone With the Wind.” Based on Margaret Mitchell’s critically