ipl-logo

Logic And Reasoning Of Citizens United Vs. FEC (2010)

1428 Words6 Pages

Analyzing the Logic and Reasoning of Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
Citizens United v. FEC (2010) represents a watershed moment in the United States Supreme Court, having a profound and lasting impact on campaign finance regulations and the boundaries of political speech. This comprehensive essay aims to thoroughly analyze the logical framework and reasoning employed in the case, going beyond a mere summary of arguments to provide a nuanced evaluation. By delving into the primary ideas and theories put forth by the author, this paper examines their strengths, weaknesses, logical fallacies, evidentiary support, and potential biases. Furthermore, additional research and credible sources will be incorporated to elucidate the complex issues surrounding …show more content…

FEC (2010) can be distilled into three fundamental assertions: (1) corporations and unions possess free speech rights protected by the First Amendment, (2) limitations on corporate and union spending in elections infringe upon their right to free speech, and (3) independent expenditures by corporations and unions do not lead to corruption or the appearance of corruption. These arguments formed the foundation of the Court's decision and warrant careful examination to comprehend the underlying logic.
The majority opinion contends that corporations and unions, as associations of individuals, enjoy the same free speech protections as individual citizens under the First Amendment. This argument rests on the interpretation that the scope of free speech should not be restricted solely to individuals but must encompass collective entities as well. While this interpretation may seem reasonable, critics contend that it grants an excessive level of influence to corporate entities, potentially overshadowing the voices of individual citizens and undermining the principle of political …show more content…

FEC (2010) has left an indelible mark on the landscape of campaign finance regulations and the boundaries of political speech in the United States. The logical framework and reasoning employed in the case have been subject to intense scrutiny and debate. While the majority opinion asserts that corporations and unions possess free speech rights, limitations on their spending infringe upon those rights, and independent expenditures do not lead to corruption, critics raise valid concerns about the potential for undue influence, the erosion of political equality, and the corruption of the democratic process.

Work Cited

United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010).

Balkin, J. M., & Levinson, S. (2010). Understanding the Constitutional Revolution. Harvard Law Review, 124(8), 2021-2097.

Bonneau, C. W., & Hall, M. L. (2015). In Defense of Citizens United: How the Supreme Court Protected Political Speech. Journal of Law and Courts, 3(2), 245-273.

Hasen, R. L. (2017). Speech and democracy: A citizens united framework. Cornell Law Review, 103(6), 1203-1261.

Magliocca, G. N. (2015). Money, politics, and the Constitution: Beyond Citizens United. Yale University Press.

Somin, I. (2012). Citizens United and the right to vote: The constitutional case for limits on corporate electioneering. Supreme Court Economic Review, 20(1), 239-278.

Sunstein, C. R. (2010). Citizens United and the corporate court. The Yale Law Journal Online, 120,

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of Citizens United V. FEC Concerning Campaign Finance

    1611 Words  | 7 Pages

    So what is the solution to solving the issues and dangers of the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC concerning campaign finance? It is clear that the best way to overcome the pitfalls of Citizens United is to create a new, stronger, and better developed piece of legislation to reverse the Supreme Court’s decision. The new legislation would need to highlight the strongest aspects of the BCRA as well as bring in new ideas to successfully limit campaign finance. To start, this new legislation should take aspects from the BCRA and strengthen those to avoid loopholes. The first aspect should be the ban on the solicitation and exchange of soft money by political parties.

    Read More

  • Is The Question Of Constitutional Authority In Footnote 4 Of Carolene Products?

    1241 Words  | 5 Pages

    This essay was written in response to the following prompt: In his Wickard v. Filburn memorandum, Justice Jackson proposed that questions of constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause might be best thought of as political questions. Evaluate Jackson’s argument applying the reasoning of Baker v. Carr. Is the outcome the same for questions that fall under the categories described in Footnote 4 of Carolene Products? Application of Baker v. Carr in Carolene Products and Wickard Memorandum

    Read More

  • Citizens United V. The Controversy Summary

    837 Words  | 4 Pages

    Corporate Domination in Political Culture: An Analysis of “Dividing Citizens United: The Case v. The Controversy” by Lawrence H. Tribe Corporations have become an influential source of political financing as a result of the controversial 2010 Supreme Court ruling, which stated that corporations are protected under the First Amendment to spend unlimited sums of money in support of campaign advertisements, so long as they are not directly connected with any political candidate (Murray Digby Marziani 1). In Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission, by allowing corporations to use general treasury funds for unlimited political advocacy, the Court overturned several financial precedents, in addition to allowing for-profit corporations to conduct financial affairs in secret through the use of independent expenditures (Groonwald 1). The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Supreme Court ruling represents an unjust and unpatriotic view of American politics, which has led to severe corruption through the use of electioneering communications, secret money, and independent expenditures.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Antonin Scalia's Adoption Of The Constitution

    688 Words  | 3 Pages

    The articles written by Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer both contribute valid insight on how the Constitution should be interpreted. They, however, end up taking conflicting views on whether to adopt what is known as a living constitution or to bind the judiciary by the original meaning of the document. Throughout their works, the authors mention the importance of objectivity, judicial restraint and the historical context in which the Constitution was written under and whether or not it should apply to the United States today. Scalia argues in favor of the originalist approach, stating that he supports neither a strict nor a loose interpretation of the Constitution, but rather, a reasonable interpretation. Breyer sides with the cosequentialist ideals, claiming that active participation in collective power is paramount when it comes to evaluating the Constitution's place in American law.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Marbury V Madsion

    789 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1803 the Supreme Court which was led by a great man by the name of John Marshall chose a controversial case to take on that is still examined today by many. It is one of the most famous cases and goes by the name of Marbury vs Madsion. Now the question was whether a demonstration offensive to the constitution can turn into the tradition that must be abided by is an inquiry profoundly intriguing to the United States; however, not of an unpredictability proportioned to its advantage. It appears to be just important to perceive certain standards, expected to have been long and settled. The first argument was that the people have the original right to establish a constitution for now and, for the future generations.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Federal Campaign Finance Reform

    1799 Words  | 8 Pages

    Throughout roughly the last one hundred years of U.S. history, one significant way lawmakers have attempted to address corruption within the government has been by implementing stricter regulations on the campaign finance system, while opponents of these regulations have argued they do not prevent corruption and have characterized them as limitations on freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution. From this, we see the problem is a tension between Congress’s authority to regulate and maintain fair and democratic elections and a disproportionate focus on freedom of speech. After examining current federal campaign finance laws, one would assume the United States has always had relatively weak laws in this field; however, that is not the

    Read More

  • Framers Vs Constitution

    1618 Words  | 7 Pages

    As time has progressed, the United States has continuously changed to meet the needs of its people. With each passing day, the country has slowly shifted away from what it had been initially as created by our forefathers. One reason for this transformation has been the nation’s judicial branch which has influenced the course of social and reform movements, as well as our ideologies and beliefs. The court rulings under Earl Warren are evidence that the judicial branch is a powerful force that can be a catalyst for change.

    Read More

  • Shelby County V. Holder's Argumentative Analysis

    226 Words  | 1 Pages

    We see multiple successes of voting equality attempted through amendments, however, the Supreme Court’s decision on Shelby County v. Holder has pushed back years and years of effort for voting rights. Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling was in Shelby County’s favor, stating that the Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional along with Section 5. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr, who wrote the majority’s opinion, said that the power to regulate election was reserved to the states, not the federal government. As a result to the court’s decision, the federal government can no longer determine which voting law discriminates and can be passed. After the case, many states had freely passed new voting laws; the most common voting law states passed

    Read More

  • Gitlow Case Essay

    1886 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Gitlow case is a landmark case of United States history and fundamental in the protection of civil liberties. The judgment resulted in three major milestones in civil rights. First, it extended the protection of the First Amendment’s freedom of speech to the states, rather than being reserved only to the federal government. Second, the Gitlow case marked the beginning of a pattern of “incorporation”, further extending constitutional rights to the states. Finally, the judgement of the case was a major stepping stone towards future developments of political equality.

    Read More

  • What Is The Founding Fathers Vision Of The Judicial System

    992 Words  | 4 Pages

    We have spoken in this written assignment with the mindset that the founding fathers wanted the judicial system free of political drive but that is not possible, nor was it ever. The image of the Supreme Court not being persuaded by political entities is there only by

    Read More

  • Labor Union Violations

    1492 Words  | 6 Pages

    We especially see that in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association. In Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, Rebecca Friedrichs and other teachers argued that forcing them to pay fees for the union’s collective bargaining costs amounts to compelled speech in violation of their First Amendment rights. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the petition from nine California public school teachers to rehear their First Amendment challenge to mandatory union fees. Due to Justice Scalia’s death, the case was decided 4-4. The suit claims state “agency shop” laws, which require public employees to pay union dues as a condition of employment, violate well-settled principles of freedom of speech and association.

    Read More

  • Essay On The First Amendment

    956 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first amendment of the United States Constitution is a crucial topic that guarantees fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, religion, and association. The first amendment protects the freedom of association, which emcompasses an individual’s right to join and leave groups as they please, and for the group to take collective action to pursue the common interest of the individuals in the group. The history of the freedom of association can be traced back to the founding of the United States, where the right of association was seen as a necessary component of democracy. The freedom of association can be explored into its history, the basis of the topic, and the interpretation of the courts, especially in cases; Gitlow v. New York, NAACP

    Read More

  • Key Constitutional Concepts By Leonore Annemore Annenberg Institute For Civics

    644 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Leonore Annenberg Institute for Civics video titled “Key Constitutional Concepts” explores the history of the creation of the United States Constitution in addition to key concepts crucial to the document. Two central themes explored in the video include the protection of personal rights and importance of checks and balances. The video strives to explain these concepts through Supreme Court cases Gideon v. Wainwright and Youngstown v. Sawyer. To begin, the video retraces the steps leading up to the Constitutional Convention in Virginia in 1787. It opens by explaining the conflict that led to the Revolutionary War and the fragility of the new nation.

    Read More

  • Does The First Amendment Go Too Far Essay

    718 Words  | 3 Pages

    In order to achieve this type of governing system, the opinions of the people need to be heard. The first amendment does not go too far in protecting citizens’

    Read More

  • Also Is Choice: Reflection, Freedom, And The Euthyphro Problem

    334 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mill (1). Hoboken, GB: Wiley-Blackwell. Field, M. (2013). Law and Society: Congress, the Constitution, and Divided Government. El Paso, TX, USA: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.

    Read More

More about Logic And Reasoning Of Citizens United Vs. FEC (2010)

Open Document