It is irrefutable that the Texas Revolution had long term effects that changed American foreign and domestic policy. The actions of one man however, was the cause of the prelude to what will become a pivotal moment in U.S. history. Samuel “Sam” Houston from Tennessee was a military leader and politician who served in the American military and the U.S. House of Representatives before moving to Texas. Although not present during the founding of the Texan colonies, Sam Houston took a stand for Texas through his military leadership, securing independence from Mexico, and setting the stage for annexation by the United States of America.
Before the arrival of Sam Houston, Stephen Austin, an American, set out to colonize land owned by the Spanish
…show more content…
A small detachment of Texan soldiers managed to take control of San Antonio and the fortified mission: the Alamo. A week before the Convention of …show more content…
This sparked a debate in the U.S. concerning the admission of another slave state in the American Union. In 1845 President James Polk encouraged a congressional resolution which barely passed in 1845, making Texas the 28th state (The Texas Question). Outraged by this event, Mexico attacked U.S. troops in the disputed territory of Rio Grande starting the Mexican American War. After the war and an American victory, Sam Houston continued to serve Texas as a Senator in the U.S. Senate and as Governor. The addition of the 28th state was part of the ideology of Manifest Destiny; Sam Houston’s resistance to Mexico and acceptance of the United States was a highlight of the movement. It brought the United States closer to its goal of stretching from the Atlantic to the
Sam Houston became determined to make a treacherous month long retreat to regain strength and replenish the Texas army’s power. Remembering how badly they lost at the alamo,Sam Houston and his men marched into San Jacinto on April 21,1836,they won a quick battle. They captured Santa Anna and won there long lost independence from
They wanted a revolution. Sam Houston took a stand by leading Texans to independence from Mexico. His actions resulted in reinforcing the need reject tyranny, increased American influence in North America and the spread of Anglicanism. Stephen Austin brought over American influence into Texas.
Briefly, in the evolution of the Texas political system, Texas’s history has been through many situations that shaped the political structure in Texas to become to what it is today. Many changes were responsible for the impact in the history of Texas such as the Texas revolution, the Alamo war with Mexico, military reconstruction act in 1867, etc. Before the war with Mexico, one of the most important impact in Texas history was the Republic of Texas Constitution in 1836. Texas and Mexico have an escalating tension and is responsible for the new change in the Texas state constitution. For the cause of the Republic of Texas Constitution in 1836, Texas begins by declaring its independence in 1836, established the Republic of Texas, and decided to adopt the new constitution.
Fight For Rights Why did Texans fight in the Civil War? This war lasted almost 4 years between the Union and the Confederacy. Many Texans thought they should take part in the war and they had a lot of reasons. Texans fought in the Civil War because they wanted to preserve slavery, support state’s rights, and because of their love for Texas. Slavery was a big part of Texas’ economy.
When Texas seceded from the United States on March 2, 1861, Texas’s own governor, Sam Houston, withheld from pledging allegiance to the Confederacy. This was the man that had defeated Santa Anna to get Texas independence from Mexico. He was also the man to start the movement to get Texas annexed into the United States. So, why did Texans fight in the Civil War? Texans fought in the Civil War to protect their families, to protect state’s rights, and to protect slavery.
“In exchange for his freedom, Santa Anna signed a treaty recognizing Texas’ independence” (Battle of San Jacinto, 2015). General Houston and his army were heavly inspired for victory following the massacres at the Alamo and Goliad. Santa Anna lost the Battle of San Jacinto due his previous viciousness, arrogance, and misuse of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) assets effectively. Had Santa Anna not made these mistakes, the Battle of San Jacinto would have turned out differently and Texas may have not won its independence from Mexico (Wright, n.d.). Introduction
As stated before, the US was justified in going to war with Mexico because of three reasons, Americans were killed, Texas was already annexed, and Manifest Destiny allows it. The United states had many superb reasons for going to war with Mexico. This essay is significant because it helps explain the United States’ choice to go to war with
The annexation of Texas occurred in the early 1800’s. American colonists were expanding into the Northern sector of the Rio Grande, which developed the need for Texas to become a part of the United States. In the South, the people supported the drive toward the annexation of Texas, but the Northerners opposed this idea. Texas was another slave state and the nature of their society did not appear appealing to the North.
Jesús Velasco-Márquez, a modern-day Mexican professor of studies wrote an article in 2006 about the Mexican-American War. He said, “US historians refer to this event as ‘The Mexican-American War’, while in Mexico, we prefer to use the term ‘The U.S. Invasion... From Mexico’s point of view, the annexation of Texas to the United States was inadmissible for both legal and security reasons. ’’’ (Velasco-Márquez, 12). During the time of the independence of Texas, Mexico was ruled by the dictator General Antonio López de Santa Anna.
The cry of war was heard between two nations that continually fought for land. Different boundaries are being claimed between America and Mexico for the fight of Texas, but the result is the increasing number of the dead. The United states chose to start the annexation of Texas. Mexico was angry with this unfair request. American troops were sent to southern Texas to only result in meeting the same set of foes.
Twenty-one days later, Santa Anna signed the peace treaty, meaning Texas had won its independence. Sam then became known for all his hard work and labor. He was “the man” for all of his doings with Texas. The people looked up to Sam and elected him as president of Texas right after his victory. The struggled was yet to go away, he still faced many problems like going into debt and Mexico wanting revenge again.
Houston was a very important person for Texas. He made decisions for the better of the Texas people and state. If Houston didn 't make certain decisions for Texas than the future of the state would 've happened completely differently. Sam Houston may have made many important decisions for Texas, but the most important decision he made was when he opposed secession from the United States.
Americans were already settling into Texas and so why shouldn 't Texas just be apart of the US. (Doc. D) In essence, the United States of America fought because of their endangered counterparts in
“Texas will again lift its head and stand among the nations’. Says Sam Houston when the fight for Texas independence began (Texas revolution). At the battle of Gonzales on October 1835, Sam Houston played a major role in fighting for independence, he lead the soldiers of Texas through the battles of gaining independence. He is a politician and a soldier, he was born at timber ridge plantation. On March 11th he joined in at the battle of Gonzales.
The words seemed so unlike Houston.” Crisp believed that this speech he heard in its entirety in 1992 to be nothing like the man he grew up learning about in history as a child. He quotes Eugene C. Barker when questioning if the Revolution is the product of racial and political inheritances of the two sides, yet goes on to say this is not what he believes despite what others think. “It seemed to me that conflict between the two groups was not as much an immediate cause as it was an eventual consequence of Texas’s separation from Mexico.” (p. 41)