Madison Carreiro
Mrs. Doklan
AP Language and Composition
27 March 2023
The Need for Longer Lunches at Emmaus High School
Students rush to lunch on a daily basis to get the first spot in the lunch line, find a table as fast as possible, and shovel their food into their mouths at an unhealthy rate, all due to the limited and unhealthy time constraint put on students in this school for eating lunch. Whether packing or buying lunch, every student in this school at one point or another faced the mad dash to the cafeteria, practically sprinting to their seat, before eating lunch in record time, and being rushed out by the urging of the cafeteria aids five minutes before the allotted lunch time had ended. However, this was not always the case.
…show more content…
A shortened lunch schedule can leave students “...‘standing in line 10 to 15 minutes to get [their] lunch and then [they] have six or seven minutes to eat’”, which is “...‘more stressful’”(Brissette qtd. in Pappano). This stress caused to students by something as simple as consuming lunch leads to dire mental health ramifications for the rest of the day if not weeks, months, or years after. An act as simple as getting and eating food in a school cafeteria leads to high levels of stress in a situation where stress and pressure should be the last thing on students’ minds. Lunch is a time for students to get a break and recharge during the school day, but has instead been turned into a race to get lunch and eat at a record speed each and every day. With this heightened stress students face from getting lunch in a short period of time, comes the overall diminished mental state of students at Emmaus High School. Students need enough time to get and eat their lunch without becoming stressed, displaying a need for longer lunch periods. Shortened lunch periods can not only cause great stress, but result in students consuming less food as a result of this stress. When an adult experienced the shortened lunch period that has now become so popular, they …show more content…
For students to have an adequate time to recharge, they “...need a longer mental break in the middle of the school day”(Crews). With the shortened break, which is closely related to shorter lunch periods, students are not given adequate time to mentally recharge and prepare for the rest of the school day, leading to exhaustion by the end of the day. Without this break, students’ mental facilities are drained by the end of the day, which leads to poorer performance in school that day or the days after. This mental exhaustion compounded with the stress already provided by the shortened lunch break, students face mental drain in multiple ways. Students are not only stressed from their lunch break, but also exhausted from the school day in general. For many students, lunch comes as one of the only breaks in their schedule, other than Hornet Homeroom, and shortening this break drains students mentally and physically. Students need an adequate break during the school day to be mentally prepared for the rest of the day. School lunches should be lengthened to accommodate the need of students for an adequate break. Students themselves feel that shortened lunches do not provide enough time to socialize. Students themselves “...are asking for…more
Students learn how to interact with other kids their age, be respectful, make new friends, and overall mature to become the best they can be, while also being prepared for life after school. In order for these students to not only learn the school subjects that are stepping stones for the rest of their academics, careers, and future jobs. Students need other time in school to work on these other important skills, lunch is this exact time. In order to maximize students conversing and making connections, all students should see each other as equals and companions. A problem with the school lunch system currently is that “Students who qualify for free school meals often receive different meals or are forced to stand in different lines, which can lead to stigma and abuse from their peers” (Besser and Bussell).
If students start packing their own lunch and not eating the cafeteria lunch then the school will be wasting food and possibly even money because the students don't want to eat it. Parents on the other hand might wonder why their child is coming home always hungry and it would be because the child doesn't like the new lunch menu at school. Then the school will have angry parents at their office desk yelling and complaining about the menu being changed because their child is going all day starving due to them not liking the food. Some of the students might blame it on the cafeteria workers when its not their fault at all, which could lead to the lunch lady's to quit their job or start complaining to. Everyone has a different opinion but this one is mine School lunches should defiantly stay the same no matter what anyone says.
A recent study found that children who regularly ateschool lunches were 29 percent more likely to beobese than their peers who brought lunch fromhome. Health science has advanced greatly since theinception of the National School Lunch Program in1946. When a 2008 Institute of Medicine committeecomprising 14 child-nutrition experts examined dataon the content of school lunches in the UnitedStates, its findings were stark. The updated standards aligned school meals withthe 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans byincreasing quantities of fruits, vegetables, andwhole grains; establishing calorie ranges; andlimiting trans fats and sodium. Children consume almost half of their total caloriesat school, and the National School Lunch Programprovides
Students Should Have Open Campus Lunch Periods Pinterest states, “Lunch hour is the best hour of the day.” Some students may not enjoy school lunches. Going off campus can open up more choices. Eating a good lunch can help students pay attention in school. I believe that students should have open campus lunches.
Considering that breakfast is one of most important meals of the day, this can affect a pupil mentally and they won’t. A way the school can help overcome this issue is by holding fundraising events to raise money for pupils that cannot afford school uniform, trips etc. Schools could also begin to provide free school meals for children of low income families so that their child can still have lunch at school without the added expensive cost. This means that they will be able to learn as normal and pay attention without being hungry and distracted during classes. To tackle the problem of a lack of breakfast due to costs, the school can hold breakfast clubs just before school starts in the morning, so that pupils can attend and have breakfast at
School could get out earlier if there wasn 't an extra period saved for lunch. Schools could even get an extra period to put in the day for an extra class or just more time to add onto the classes that are already going on in school. Kids would also be healthier if they did not eat the lunch from school because you never know how much fat, grease, and unhealthy ingredients are in school lunches. Even though school lunches make a lot of students not feel good, it could be a good idea to have lunch so they get energy and are not hungry throughout the day.
Another issue that deeply affects students is the lack of time to eat. All three thousand students are fed at once, but the lunch period only lasts for thirty minutes. By the time students are actually able to sit down with their food, most of the period has already flown by. As one teacher points out: “The line for kids to get their food is very long... They get 10 minutes probably to eat their meals” (Kozol 717).
Though new school lunch organizations provide a healthier, more proficient learning environment, they also promote realms of controversy over student meals. However, these conflicts are futile in comparison to constant concerns over global health issues, including obesity, anorexia, and even
Has everyone known that many elementary school students feel anxiety and stress whenever they take quizzes and exams every school year? Do students who consume large amounts of unhealthy foods receive lower standardized-test scores? In recent years, “standardized test scores have been the dominant metric for measuring what public-school students know and are able to do” (Anderson 1). According to an article in The Atlantic, “Do Healthy Lunches Improve Test Scores?,” Melinda D. Anderson discusses the main issues of elementary students’ current health and academic progress. Throughout the well-written article, Anderson successfully utilizes language to argue about the benefits of elementary students’ healthy lunches, establishes her credibility,
Some people may argue that school lunches are not healthy enough and need to be changed to foods that are more nutritious.
In conclusion schools should not change the lunches because they don't have the power to tell students can or can't eat, they don't have the time and money, and finally because they are not allowed to put a limit on how much a student can eat due to the “No Kid Hungry
“Healthy school lunch means students are getting the nourishment they need to power their minds and bodies to learn. ”-Unknown. This quote is relevant because students need good, healthy food to be able to focus in class. When the students have eaten a good healthy food they won’t be worrying about when they’re going to get their next meal. The food needs to actually look edible for kids to even think about eating it.
Snacking has proven to increase energy rates, which would help students’ and schools if used right. Snacking would keep students minds focused on their work and what is going on in the classroom. Although some time may be lost during the extended breaks, it would be made up. There is no point for students to sit through a class on an empty stomach and not be paying attention. This would all be solved by students being able to eat in class because it helps the mind focus and stay on task.
Studies show that overweight students tend to have more problems with learning and paying attention (Miura). Many parents also fear that children would have the chance to skip school of get into drugs and alcohol while they are loose for their lunch break. People of the communities have also expressed their fears of increased traffic and increased risk of traffic collisions (?9 Primary Pros and Cons of Open Campus Lunch?). Not only can open lunches cause health problems, but they can lead to other dangers such as a car crash or
Stress has become a major issue for high school students. Many students have seven classes, participate in sports, have after school activities, homework, and need to get an adequate amount of sleep each night. Some parents and outside influencers don’t see the benefits of having a longer lunch period for high school students. Students complain about how long school is now but they don 't have enough time outside of school to complete everything they are expected to. While it is understandable that some parents wouldn’t want longer lunches because it could result in safety issues and students having to remain in school 30 minutes longer than the traditional time, longer lunches would give students a chance to complete homework, get help from teachers, and eat a nutritious meal.