Louis Pojman Argument
The late, Louis Pojman, was a great American philosopher, who was known for his many writings such as A Defense of the Death Penalty. The death penalty has always been a very touchy subject for most people. People have their views of what they consider right or wrong. Philosopher Pojman was pro-death penalty, so naturally he had some who agreed with him and some that did not. As I read the “Best Bet” argument my opinion of murderers is that they deserve to be killed for their horrid actions. Pojman uses emotion to prove his argument very well. Pojman made many wise analogies throughout his writings. He put things into a perspective everyone could understand. I can see that he makes a very strong case by using the Bible to back up his views. …show more content…
He believes “that to bet against capital punishment is to bet against the innocent and for the murderer” (Pojman 144). Pojman thinks that if the murderers are given a long prison sentence than the murderers win. I agree because, when the murder kills they lose their right to live. Pojman writes that, “…human beings… have dignity, one who with malice aforethought kills a human being forfeits his right to life and deserves to die [sic]” (Pojman 140). The United States should have the death penalty because it would keep murderers from killing again. Pojman uses the analogy if someone committed murder, they would be struck and killed instantly by lightning because by taking another life they forfeited theirs. I find that the following two points from Pojman provides a valid argument as of why we should have the death penalty. He states if we choose a policy of having the death penalty and “… we’re right, we have saved the lives of the innocent. If we are wrong, unfortunately, we’ve sacrificed the lives of some murderers.” (Pojman 144). We should choose the death penalty because I see it as taking a precaution to stop someone from taking any more innocent lives. Executing the murderers is the only way justice can be given to the person who was murdered and their families. If people knew that they would be killed themselves for murdering someone they would not do it because they would not want to
Joshua Marquis Death Penalty Analysis
588 Words | 3 PagesJoshua Marquis is neither a scholar, a jurist, or a crusader for the wrongly accused. Instead he has spent most of his time as a prosecutor. His essay is written from a personal point of view where he supports the death penalty; however, his essay is unlike the average supporter. Joshua Marquis believes capital punishment should be decided based on the following: each case on its own, within its own context, using the specific facts of the case, considering the community where the crime occurred and the background of the defendants. With that being said, Marquis believes that for certain cases the death penalty is appropriate.
Essay On The Cost Of Death Penalty
571 Words | 3 Pages(3). A philosophical belief about the capital punishment to observe the financial impracticality of the system because leaders should begin an investigation to determine the cost of the death penalty system. They could make a more informed choice about whether to keep it for sentences for life without
Stephen Nathanson Capital Punishment
281 Words | 2 PagesCapital Punishment Punishment is the imposition of a penalty as retribution for a crime, and the retribution deserves those who do the crime. The main idea of this chapter is whether the killer deserves to die or not, and we ought to kill them or not. Stephen Nathanson argues against the punishment that leads to execution. He said that the actual and moral beliefs based on the death penalty are wrong and must be repealed. Many people said that the death penalty is the best way to deter murder and thus save lives.
Death Penalty Fails To Equal Retribution By Anna Quindlen
304 Words | 2 PagesEditor Anna Quindlen wrote many articles and essays conveying her opinion toward the death penalty. Such as, “Death Penalty Fails to Equal Retribution” and “Public & Private; The High Cost of Death”. Although Anna Quindlen makes many valuable accusations regarding her reasoning to being opposed to the death penalty, she undermines the real purpose of the penalty itself. The Death penalty, is indeed necessary. Many of the accusations Anna proclaims permit to the emotions of the victims families that have been robbed of their loved one by the said killer.
Hamilton Spectator The Death Penalty Analysis
130 Words | 1 PagesIn the article, “The Death Penalty: An Opinion Essay,” written by Hamilton Spectator, states that is the first issue that he mentions is that the justice system is never 100% right all the time. While other situations can be changed by a judge a death penalty is unchangeable. Various times of similar crimes are conferred and diverse sentences are given out. As well as depending on the criminals race the consequences valid on the judge 's opinion.
Abolish The Death Penalty In Texas
760 Words | 4 PagesThese arguments can be supported and solidified by the cases of Andre Thomas and Anthony Graves. Those who wish to abolish the death penalty may begin by arguing that
Flaws In Anthony Porter's Justice System
415 Words | 2 PagesMy position on death penalty is that criminals who have committed deadly multiple homicides should be executed if there is enough evidence against them, making sure that no innocent people are punished. Yes, the the article had strengthen my position that innocent people should not be punished. Death penalty should be given only if the defendant murdered two or more people and it should not be a sentencing option when only eyewitness evidence
Robert Blecker Death Penalty Research Paper
143 Words | 1 PagesIn the debate two candidate for death penalty were Robert Blecker and Kent Scheidegger. They argument by saying that Everyone wants a neighborhood that 's safe and communities that are strong. And in order to do that, we have to focus on the root causes of crime and punish the criminals proportional to their crime that is the Hammurabi code “An Eye for an eye”. Robert Blecker said, let the punishment fit the crime and The closest we come to serious punishment left in this society is the death penalty. He said he would reserve the death penalty for essentially terrorists, mass murderers, murderers of vulnerable victims, especially children, rapist murderers, contract killers, and torture killers.
Beccaria's Argument Against The Death Penalty
147 Words | 1 PagesAlthough the death penalty is still a very controversial topic today, Beccaria is correct in his assertion that it is not necessary. The death penalty fails to provide a means of reforming an individual, and does not leave a lasting impression on others. Though the
Igor Primoratz's Argument For The Death Penalty
756 Words | 4 PagesIgor Primoratz sets forth an argument that to ensure justice in the legal system the utilization of capital punishment is necessary. According to Primoratz there is no punishment of any equivalence to that of murder, whereas for less severe crimes fines and prison time is reasonable. Primoratz argument consists of three defences to common feedback to the action of capital punishment. The one that was most appealing to me being whether it violates the right to life. To this he responds that when the took the life of another human they lost this right; as these right are only given to those who respect the rights of others.
Pojman's Argument Against The Death Penalty
162 Words | 1 PagesPojman’s argument against the objections to capital punishment is not completely valid. If we understand the human being, we can also understand that humans are spiteful people and many people are filled with the hopes of revenge. Therefore, the thirst of revenge could potentially be a contributing factor as to why people are for the death penalty. Even if Pojman doesn’t believe in revenge, it should not be a valid reason for him to ignore its potential in justice and decision making during trials. This world is already filled with bitterness towards one another and we, as a society, cannot stop it because we all have different morals.
Pros And Cons Of The Daubert Standard
1404 Words | 6 PagesMany people would argue about the essentiality of the death penalty in deterring crimes and others would
Cesare Beccaria's Argument Against Capital Punishment
695 Words | 3 PagesHe claims “… ‘cost studies’…” essentially reveal most murders take a life without parole which costs the government inmate finances whereas the penalty gives the offender no room for an appeal. Capital punishment puts an end to a life that deserves ending due to the choices made of ending an innocent person. In my opinion, looking at both sides as to why and why not the death penalty should be instated or abolished, I agree that it should be a constitutional law reinforced in every state, with each state continuing to define capital punishment as it chooses. Although it violates some of the constitutions laws in different ways, it saves the government
Should The Death Penalty Be Illegal Essay
1267 Words | 6 PagesThe Death Penalty, loss of life due to previous crimes and actions, is believed by some to be extremely costly, inhumane, and cruel unlike some others whom believe it is just, right, and provides closure. The Death Penalty is not a quick and easy process. Most who get sentenced to deaths row wait years for their ultimate punishment of death. Some believe that it is not right to punish and kill a human for actions they have done because, they believe that the inmate should have another chance. Then others believe that it is right to punish someone for their actions especially if their actions involve killing another or multiple humans.
Persuasive Essay On Death Penalty
750 Words | 3 PagesDeath Penalty According to the 2010 Gallup Poll, 64% of the United State of America are supporting the death penalty, I as an American am part of that 36% that is against it. I do not believe that we as human being should determine whether another person should live or die. A second reason that I am against the death penalty is for the reason that the accused person could be innocent and normally the accused person only has one court presentation and is only judged by the judge not a jury of their peer, and is sent to death row where they pay for a crime that they haven’t done. My final reason that i do not believe that the death penalty should count as a punishment for the American people is because, a person that has done a massive massacre shouldn’t just be able to leave the world just like that without paying and suffering for what they have done, Or should the death punishment continue as it is for it has a great benefit to us as citizens of the United States.
More about Louis Pojman Argument
Joshua Marquis Death Penalty Analysis
588 Words | 3 PagesEssay On The Cost Of Death Penalty
571 Words | 3 PagesStephen Nathanson Capital Punishment
281 Words | 2 PagesDeath Penalty Fails To Equal Retribution By Anna Quindlen
304 Words | 2 PagesHamilton Spectator The Death Penalty Analysis
130 Words | 1 PagesAbolish The Death Penalty In Texas
760 Words | 4 PagesFlaws In Anthony Porter's Justice System
415 Words | 2 PagesRobert Blecker Death Penalty Research Paper
143 Words | 1 PagesBeccaria's Argument Against The Death Penalty
147 Words | 1 PagesIgor Primoratz's Argument For The Death Penalty
756 Words | 4 PagesPojman's Argument Against The Death Penalty
162 Words | 1 PagesPros And Cons Of The Daubert Standard
1404 Words | 6 PagesCesare Beccaria's Argument Against Capital Punishment
695 Words | 3 PagesShould The Death Penalty Be Illegal Essay
1267 Words | 6 PagesPersuasive Essay On Death Penalty
750 Words | 3 Pages