In 1913-1914, miners in Southern Colorado, aggravated by low pay, bad working conditions, and an abusive system, voted to stop working and strike. The Colorado Coal Strikers of 1913-1914 endured harsh living conditions, disease, and oppression in order to better their lives. To resume work, the Rockefellers, who owned the mines, hired gunmen to compel miners to stop the strike, accept poor lifestyles, and get back to work. One of the major events of this strike was the The Ludlow Massacre, where miners and their families were massacred in a garish show of power. The Ludlow Massacre was the Rockefellers’ doing. The Rockefellers cheated workers of money, causing strikes and eventually strikebreaking. They also used their power to strongarm the …show more content…
The discontent workers of the Colorado mines decided to stop working to go strike. One of the camps formed by these workers was the Ludlow tent camp. This camp was brutally attacked by the National Guard in the coming months. Women, children, and striking miners alike were massacred, all because the Rockefellers refused to shed some wealth. According to “A History of the Colorado Coalfield War” by the Colorado Historical society, the strikes began after the Rockefellers refused to “increase wages... [pay] for ‘dead work’...[have] a miner check the scales...[and have] the right to trade in any store...”(History 1). The miners struck because of poor pay, getting cheated, and being forced to spend money in company owned markets. If the Rockefellers had been willing to lose some money, the miners would not have gone on strike. If the miners did not strike, then the violence used to get them back to work would not have occurred, and the Ludlow Massacre would cease to have ever existed. The miners requests were entirely rejected, without any compromise, so they were forced to work under the same poor pay and conditions as before. The Rockefellers’ greed caused them to cheat miners of their money, and because the miners sought to get what they earned, they were persecuted. The Ludlow Massacre was the Rockefellers fault because if they had been less stingy towards employees, strikes would …show more content…
After hiring a private agency to terrorize strikers, the Rockefellers realized this was not effective enough. Taking advantage of their influence over others, the Rockefellers sought the help of the media and government to resolve issues. The involvement of the National Guard may seem like the Colorado Governor’s doing, but it was not without pressure from the Rockefellers’ assets. Howard Zinn, in his work Declarations of Independence quotes John Rockefeller, Jr. in that “...another mighty power has been rounded up on behalf of the operators by the getting together of fourteen of the editors of the most important newspapers in the state” (Zinn 1). John Rockefeller, Jr. acknowledges that the Governor’s power was attained not by what he believed was right, but by the power his media had over politicians. If the Governor had refused, he would have likely been crucified by the media. Via utilizing this power, the Rockefellers had just what they needed to take down the strikes: Government influence and gunpower. The powerful family manipulated others into conformity with their will, and did as they pleased with the them as a result. The National Guard that carried out the Ludlow Massacre was funded, supported, and backed by the Rockefellers. This also means that the Rockefellers were accountable for the horrific
Henry Frick was most to blame for the labor dispute at Homestead turning into a violent battle because he lowered working conditions, locked disagreeing workers out of the factory, and hired the Pinkertons. Frick lowered the pay and lengthened the work hours for the workers, causing the workers to go on strike. Lowering the workers ' conditions shows that Frick clearly did not care about the workers, causing unhappy workers who wanted to change some things about their work. Frick also locked the workers out of the factory. His quick and uncaring ways showed that whoever was working for Frick did not matter to him since he could easily replace them with workers who would not complain.
Among the many issues they wanted resolved, some were like many other workers’ union goals. They were fighting
They needed to provide and survive. Unions were their best chance and their alleged methods may have been extreme, however, they contrived their point. Taking an in depth look, historians now viewed the Molly Maguires and the union as labor heroes, fighting for workers rights against insurmountable odds. The terrible working conditions in the mines and the secretive activism of the Irish mining community made violence, in their eyes and the eyes of the working class, inevitable and justifiable. They also concluded that the violence that occurred was to some degree rationalized and seriously misrepresented by the
The Gilded Age boasted a lot of great things for the United States. It created so much in such a short amount of time, but that time also brought bad things. Monopolies, factory accidents, horrible working conditions, and an ever-growing gap between the rich and the poor. These problems were handled very poorly due. This was due to nobody really caring about the poor and not eliminating trusts.
Was John D. Rockefeller a robber baron? I’d say so. Through ruthless business tactics and exploitation of workers, he made a fortune in his lifetime. In this paper, I’m going to be talking about said business tactics and exploitation. If you believe Rockefeller was just a good business man who donated to the poor, I hope your view will be changed by the end.
To illustrate, in 1890, John Sherman passed a bill known as the “Sherman Antitrust Act,” which attempted to counter the growing number of trusts and monopolies in the country (Doc. 4). Although the Antitrust Act failed to stop any trusts, the act did help pave the way for legislation in the early 1900’s that would help workers and workers’ rights. In conclusion,
*Pullman Strike * The Pullman Strike was widespread by the United States railroad workers, approximately a quarter-million worker were on strike at the peak and it impacted the expedition the railroad system across the states. The strike between the American Railway Union and George Pullman changed the course of future strikes when President Grover Cleveland ordered federal troops to break up the strikers; its influenced how the federal government and the court system would handle labor issues. The labor issues during the Pullman Strike were not limited that of rights of the workers, the role of management in the workers private life, and the roles of government resolving labor conflicts. Pullman planned communities for his workers how he determined
The Boston Massacre was an accident in the beginning, but it continued to go on until it reached an extent where it could be an accident no longer. The real question is when did this accident start, and when did it get too far? Some say it should have never happened. others say it was the start of the revolution. Captain Thomas Preston was a British officer stationed in Massachusetts staying in a home with other soldiers under the Quartering Act.
The organized labor of 1875-1900 was unsuccessful in proving the position of workers because of the future strikes, and the intrinsical feeling of preponderation of employers over employees and the lack of regime support. In 1877, railroad work across the country took part in a cyclopean strike that resulted in mass violence and very few reforms. An editorial, from the Incipient York Time verbalized: "the strike is ostensibly hopeless, and must be regarded as nothing more than a rash and splenetic demonstration of resentment by men too incognizant or too temerarious to understand their own interest" (Document B). In 1892, workers at the Homestead steel plant near Pittsburg ambulated out on strike and mass chaos the lives of at least two Pinkerton detectives and one civilian, among many other laborers death (Document G).
The Knights of Labor, founded by Terence Powderly and Uriah Stephens in 1869, helped create a union contract with Carnegie’s Braddock Mill. While the Knights of Labor were trying to have broad social reform around the country, they created a lockout in the Braddock Mill. Workers like Kratcha did not care as much about the union’s goals, instead they wanted the mills to be open so that they could earn money (25). Large business owners, like Carnegie, tried, and usually succeed, at breaking strikes and unions in their mills. In Homestead and Braddock, Kratcha experienced the effects of strikes, and they were not positive.
In the late 1800’s, J.P Morgan, John Rockefeller, and Andrew Carnegie had a negative impact on society because they were Robber Barons. They treated their workers very poorly in a way that should not have happened. J.P Morgan forced his workers to labor under harsh conditions for long hours and low pay. This is coming from a guy who has made millions of dollars and who has started a 60 million dollar business. Knowing how much money he has and how very little he pays his workers shows how ruthless he is as a business owner.
Robber Barons were people who built a fortune by stealing money from the American people, and creating monopolies. The men of the 1800’s were Robber Barons. These men drove out their competition, treated their workers terribly, and created monopolies. Some Robber Barons at the time include, John D. Rockefeller, and Cornelius Vanderbilt. 7 percent of American people owned 90 percent of America’s wealth in total.
Rockefeller has made an impact on the industrial revolution by changing and monopolizing the oil industry to bigger and better ideas. His funding to major organizations and schools, and motivation towards younger generations to push forward with his
The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops
Profits for the farmers were getting smaller and smaller due to the increase in prices for the goods to be sold. These farmers believed in many different things- they believed in rules and regulations for the road (which included the fact that the government should control the railroad), lower tariffs, and that money should be based off of silver standard. For the industrial workers, their working conditions were not ideal. Each worker did not get paid nearly enough to support them and their families, even though they worked ten plus hour days, six days a week. Workers were not paid for sick days or injury.