Maitin-Shepards’ essay is a better scholarly source than Istvans’ because he has more credibility, it is located in a text book, and the content is more cultured. Maitin-Shepard has more of a stable/logical background in the topic of morality and artificial intelligence while Istvan has more of an opinionated background. Maitin-Shepards essay is located in a textbook which makes it more credible because the school would not give us a book about false information, unless it were clearly stated as false information. Istvans essay is on a website, which is the Huffington post so it makes it seem more credible than it truly is because Huffington post is a popular name. Maitin-Shepards content is more believable because it is more factual than Istvans because Istvan is mostly writing about his opinion. Maitin-Shepards essay is a better scholarly writing than Istvans essay because it is easier to believe what Maitin-Shepard is saying because he has more of an educational background. According to Rectenwald and Carl (2015), “Jeremy Maitin-Shepard was born and raised in the Boston area, where he attended the Commonwealth School, an independent liberal arts high school. He studied computer science at Carnegie Mellon University, graduating with a Bachelor of Science degree in 2008. He is currently a doctoral student in the …show more content…
Maitin-Shepards essay is published in “Scholarly Writing, Real World Topics”. Why would they put his essay in a textbook and give it to students if it were false information? Istvans essay is published online on Huffington post. Anyone can write stuff online. People might say he has a more scholarly essay than Maitin-Shepards because his is on Huffington post. However, all they have to do is find a popular subject and write about it. In order to be in a textbook they test the information you’re writing about and then publish
Introduction We Are Marshall is a Sports/drama film composed in 2006 by Joseph Mcginty Nichol. Based in 1970’s the exploration significant issues of grief and guilt and no team or players in that era of time strengthens one's understanding of the film as these issues are associated with universal themes such as facing reality and rebirth which applies to anyone regardless of time period,ethnicity or religion. We are Marshall tells the story of the aftermath of the calamitous plane crash on November 14 th 1970 in West Virginia which killed 75 members of the Marshall University ‘Thundering Herd’ college football team and covers the rebirth of the varsity team and the small community of Huntington. Paragraph 1 When experiencing times of grief
Is college still important and relevant? The question is answered and confirmed when Liz Addison, author of “Two Years Are Better than Four”, wrote a counter argument in order to disprove the opposing views of Rick Perlstein, the author of, “What’s the Matter with College”. The topic that is being brought to light is the subject of whether or not college still matters. Perlstein that college is no longer what it used to be. It was after reading Perlstein’s article that Addison masterfully wrote her counter argument which successfully contradicted the opinionated, inaccurate views of Rick Perlstein.
“I think a stalwart peasant in sheep-skin coat, born on the soil, whose forefathers have been farmers for ten generations, with a stout wife and half a dozen children, is good quality”-Clifford Sifton. Sir Clifford Sifton born on March 10th,1861 is one of the most accomplished Politian’s of his time, most notable for his assertive promotion of immigration to settle 20th century Canada’s west. Sifton moved to Manitoba in 1875 and Graduated from Victoria College in 1880, and was called to be a member of the Manitoba Bar in 1882. He was elected in 1891 as attorney general under Thomas Greenway.
Graff thinks that a lot of kids would much rather read a magazine or book about their favorite sports player, car, or fashion designer rather than read Shakespeare or other writer you read about in school (270). Students like to learn about what they like to do, and even if they don’t like to write about what they read Graff explains “ Even if they don’t , the magazine reading will make them more literate and reflective than they would otherwise” (270). Writing is writing as long as the student likes to write, they will get better at it no matter what they write about. Graff would much rather have, “the student anytime who writes a sharply argued, sociologically acute analysis of an issue of Source over the student who writes a lifeless explication of Hamlet or Socrates’s Apology” (270). A student who writes well doesn’t have to be writing about great works throughout history, they just need to know how to write well even if it comes from a
He discusses it you can find commonalities between intellectual disciplines is a period in your support. The author concludes by opinion when people use the same paper for different classes feel mistaken, but they do their homework by themselves, they are smart, lazy people
In the year 2006, the Stolen Valor Act made it illegal to make medals of Honor. The case brought forth to us describes issues brought about by this act. In United States v. Fields, Abel Fields attended a meeting where he proclaimed that he had military experience, and that he earned a Purple Heart. He had made false statements, and in turn was convicted, and had to pay a $1,000 fine. Fields felt that his First Amendment rights had been violated.
Percy L. Julian was one of the greatest scientific minds that ever lived. He made many medical advances in history that help us today. Even though he was denied high school education, he was still able to learn at an astonishing rate. He helped contribute to many different and huge medical advances and without those the world would be a very different place. Thanks to him we can live knowing that we will be able to live to be healthy and old into our later years.
One common afternoon in the year of 2081, when everyone was equal, Hazel and George Bergeron were in their lovely living room watching television. Suddenly, a news reporter with a severe speech impediment came on. After trying many times to say, “Good morning ladies and gentlemen,” he handed it off to a ballerina who read, “Harrison Bergeron, age 14, has just escaped from jail, where he was held on suspicion of plotting to overthrow the government. He is a genius and an athlete, is under-handicapped, and should be regarded as extremely dangerous.” However, in this short story “Harrison Bergeron”, Kurt Vonnegut uses irony, shift and mood, and allusion to illustrated haw society would be if everyone was under the law of equality.
Laws are the key to having a well-mannered society. They are created with the intention of bringing good to the civilization. However, even actions with good intentions can end with devastating results. This is what occurs in Kurt Vonnegut Jr.’s “Harrison Bergeron”. “Harrison Bergeron” is about a dystopian- like future that has had citizens stripped of their individuality due to an Amendment.
He feels struggled. He had to work harder and received a failing grade on the first paper. However, he said “I was both devastated and determined, my not belonging was verified but I was not ready to be shut down.” He decided to search the school’s library to look up the publishing’s of his Professor. He would write his paper, research the Professors writing style, and then revise his own writing.
The Other Wes Moore: One Name, Two Fates is a New York Times Bestseller by none other than, Wes Moore. This novel features an intriguing tale of two boys who grew up under the same circumstances, under the same names, and with the same chances; and yet one manages to become a Rhodes Scholar, decorated combat veteran, White House Fellow, and business leader while the other grew up heisting and selling drugs until he received a life sentence for felony murder after shooting a police officer. The more successful Wes Moore, Wes Moore, began to visit the less successful Wes Moore, the other Wes Moore, during his prison sentence in order to write the book. Furthermore, the book turned out to be great.
In the novel Michael Vey, Richard Paul Evans conveys the idea of friendship and fidelity in the midst of the book through the unyielding bonds created and withheld. Within the story, Michael Vey, and his omnipotent team do not cease to vanquish their seditionist, Admiral Hatch and his army with despicable plans to utterly change the people of the world... and not for the better. Michael and his friends perpetually remain faithful to one another, even when they could easily turn their backs and return to a "normal" life. Though many times the "Electroclan" (what they called themselves) had multiple rendezvous with death, the team wouldn 't give up, and fought to save not only themselves but each other. "Suicide or not, I have to try to save
Crispin’s knowledge Intro: Crispin the Cross of Lead, is a historical fiction novel by Avi. It takes place in medieval England and follows a 13-year-old boy named Crispin trying to escape being punished for a crime he did not do. During his journey, Crispin meets many new people and goes to many new places. Crispin is a dynamic character whose knowledge greatly increases as he embarks on his journey.
Christianity was, to the slaves of America, (something with a double meaning). In the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass an American Slave, Frederick Douglass, the author, argues about how Christianity can mean one thing to a free white man and something completely different to a black slave. The slave owners follow the ‘Christianity of the Land’ while the slaves follow the ‘Christianity of Christ.’ Frederick begins to build his credibility to a, white, northern, audience by including documents from trustworthy writers and by getting into personal experiences through his writing. Throughout the narrative, he is articulate in how he writes, and it shows the reader that he is well educated.
In the poem of “Touchscreen,” by Marshall Davis Jones, he is explaining how our feelings towards technology are crucial and where we do not want to live in a world without internet or media. He describes how he lives in a society where everyone has limited interaction with each other and that he witnesses doing it also. He explains his frustration how we spend so much time establishing profiles so other people can recognize you. In the beginning of the poem, it introduces you to his world where it is all digital and in the end, it shows you that the speaker is angry about technology and how he wishes that they would design it more advanced enough to make them all humans again.